Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Voting in E-Participation: A Set of Requirements to Support Accountability and Trust by Electoral Committees

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Electronic Voting (E-Vote-ID 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 10615))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Voting is an important part of electronic participation whenever it comes to finding a common opinion among the many participants. The impact of the voting result on the outcome of the e-participation process might differ a lot as voting can relate to approving, polling or co-decision making. The greater the impact of the electronic voting on the outcomes of the e-participation process, the more important become the regulations and technologies that stipulate the voting system and its procedures. People need to have trust in the voting system in order to accept the outcomes. Hence, it is important to use thoroughly trustworthy, auditable and secure voting systems in e-participation; especially whenever the voting within the e-participation process is likely to have a significant impact on the outcome. This paper analyses the verdict of the Austrian Constitutional Court in relation to the repeal of the Elections to the Austrian Federation of Students in 2009 where electronic voting was piloted as additional remote channel for casting a ballot. The court states its perspectives on elections and electronic voting which serve as sources for the derivation of legal requirements for electronic voting in this paper, namely requirements for accountability and trust by the electoral committee. Then, possible solutions for the requirements based on scholarly literature are described. The paper does not intend to explicitly provide e-voting solutions for elections, but instead proposes to serve as a basis for discussion of electronic voting in different e-participation scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In German: “Hochschülerinnen- und Hochschülerschaftswahlordnung 2005”. Available at: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokument.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Dokumentnummer=NOR30006701.

  2. 2.

    https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/defaultEn.aspx.

References

  1. Viborg Andersen, K., Zinner Henriksen, H., Secher, C., Medaglia, R.: Costs of e-participation: the management challenges. Transforming Gov. People Process Policy 1(1), 29–43 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arnstein, S.R.: A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Planners 35(4), 216–224 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schossböck, J., Rinnerbauer, B., Sachs, M., Wenda, G., Parycek, P.: Identification in e-participation: a multi-dimensional model. Int. J. Electron. Gov. 8(4), 335–355 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Krimmer, R.: e-Voting.at: Elektronische Demokratie am Beispiel der österreichischen Hochschülerschaftswahlen. Working Papers on Information Processing and Information Management 05/2002 of the Vienna University of Economics and Business (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Krimmer, R., Ehringfeld, A., Traxl, M.: The use of e-voting in the federation of students elections 2009. In: Krimmer, R., Grimm, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Electronic Voting 2010, pp. 33–44, Bonn (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Krimmer, R., Ehringfeld, A., Traxl, M.: Evaluierungsbericht. E-Voting bei den Hochschülerinnen- und Hochschülerschaftswahlen 2009. BMWF, Vienna (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lopez-Pintor, R.: Electoral Management Bodies as Institutions of Governance. Bureau for Development Policy, United Nations Development Programme (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. ACE Electoral Knowledge Network. Elections and Technology. http://aceproject.org/ace-en/topics/et/onePage. Accessed 21 Apr 2017

  9. Caarls, S.: E-voting Handbook: Key Steps in the Implementation of E-enabled Elections. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mozaffar, S., Schedler, A.: The comparative study of electoral governance – introduction. Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. 23(1), 5–27 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gillard, S.: Soft-skills and technical expertise of effective project managers. Issues Inf. Sci. Inf. Technol. 6, 723–729 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prosser, A., Kofler, R., Krimmer, R., Unger, M.K.: Implementation of quorum-based decisions in an election committee. In: Traunmüller, R. (ed.) EGOV 2004. LNCS, vol. 3183, pp. 122–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30078-6_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Rubin, A.D.: Security considerations for remote electronic voting. Commun. ACM 45(12), 39–44 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chiang, L.: Trust and security in the e-voting system. Electron. Gov. Int. J. 6(4), 343–360 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bishop, M., Wagner, D.: Risks of e-voting. Commun. ACM 50(11), 120 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pieters, W.: Acceptance of voting technology: between confidence and trust. In: Stølen, K., Winsborough, W.H., Martinelli, F., Massacci, F. (eds.) iTrust 2006. LNCS, vol. 3986, pp. 283–297. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi:10.1007/11755593_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Jorba, A.R., Roca, J.C.: Secure remote electronic voting system and cryptographic protocols and computer programs employed. U.S. Patent No. 7,260,552, 21 August 2007

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ikonomopoulos, S., Lambrinoudakis, C., Gritzalis, D., Kokolakis, S., Vassiliou, K.: Functional requirements for a secure electronic voting system. In: Ghonaimy, M.A., El-Hadidi, M.T., Aslan, H.K. (eds.) Security in the Information Society. IAICT, vol. 86, pp. 507–519. Springer, Boston, MA (2002). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-35586-3_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Ibrahim, S., Kamat, M., Salleh, M., Aziz, S.R.A.: Secure E-voting with blind signature. In: Proceedings of 4th National Conference on Telecommunication Technology. NCTT 2003, pp. 193–197. IEEE Publications (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Regenscheid, A., Beier, G.: Security Best Practices for the Electronic Transmission of Election Materials for UOCAVA Voters, NISTIR 7711, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) – U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, M.D. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Richter, P.: The virtual polling station: transferring the sociocultural effect of poll site elections to remote internet voting. In: Krimmer R., Grimm R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Electronic Voting 2010, pp. 79–86. Bonn (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gritzalis, D.A.: Principles and requirements for a secure e-voting system. Comput. Secur. 21(6), 539–556 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Küsters, R., Truderung, T., Vogt, A.: Accountability: definition and relationship to verifiability. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS 2010), pp. 526–535. ACM, Chicago (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gharadaghy, R., Volkamer, M.: Verifiability in electronic voting - explanations for non security experts. In: Krimmer R., Grimm R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Electronic Voting 2010, pp. 151–162. Bonn (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Karayumak, F., Olembo, M.M., Kauer, M., Volkamer, M.: Usability analysis of helios-an open source verifiable remote electronic voting system. EVT/WOTE 11, 5 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kremer, S., Ryan, M., Smyth, B.: Election verifiability in electronic voting protocols. In: Gritzalis, D.A., Preneel, B., Theoharidou, M. (eds.) Computer Security – ESORICS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6345, pp. 389–404. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15497-3_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Krimmer, R.: Verifiability: a new concept challenging or contributing to existing election paradigms? In: Proceedings of the 13th EMB Conference, pp. 102–107, Bucharest (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mitrou, L., Gritzalis, D., Katsikas, S.: Revisiting legal and regulatory requirements for secure e-voting. In: Ghonaimy, M.A., El-Hadidi, M.T., Aslan, H.K. (eds.) Security in the Information Society. IAICT, vol. 86, pp. 469–480. Springer, Boston, MA (2002). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-35586-3_37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Khaki, F.: Implementing End-to-End Verifiable Online Voting for Secure, Transparent and Tamper-Proof Elections. IDC Whitepaper 33 W (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Prosser, A., Krimmer, R., Kofler, R., Unger, M.K.: The role of the election commission in electronic voting. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. HICSS 2005, pp. 119–119. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Norden, L., Burstein, A., Hall, J.L., Chen, M.: Post-Election Audits: Restoring Trust in Elections, Report by Brennan Center for Justice at The New York University School of Law and The Samuelson Law, Technology and Public Policy Clinic at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law (Boalt Hall) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fisher, K., Carback, R., Sherman, A.T.: Punchscan: introduction and system definition of a high-integrity election system. In: Preproceedings of the 2006 IAVoSS Workshop on Trustworthy Elections, Robinson College (Cambridge, United Kingdom), International Association for Voting System Sciences (2006). [full citation unavailable]

    Google Scholar 

  33. Adida, B.H.: Web-based open-audit voting. In: van Oorschot, P.C. (ed.) Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Security Symposium, pp. 335–348. USENIX Association, Berkley (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chaum, D., Essex, A., Carback, R., Sherman, A., Clark, J., Popoveniuc, S., Vora, P.: Scantegrity: end-to-end voter-verifiable optical scan voting. IEEE Secur. Priv. 6(3), 40–46 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sherman, A.T., Carback, R., Chaum, D., Clark, J., Essex, A., Herrnson, P.S., Mayberry, T., Popovenuic, S., Rivest, R.L., Shen, E., Sinha, B., Vora, P.: Scantegrity mock election at Takoma Park. In: Krimmer R., Grimm R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Electronic Voting 2010, pp. 35–51. Kollen Druck+Verlag GmbH, Bonn (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Prandini, M., Ramilli, M.: A model for e-voting systems evaluation based on international standards: definition and experimental validation. Serv. J. 8(3), 42–72 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Internet Policy Institute: Report of the National Workshop on Internet Voting: Issues and Research Agenda, An Internet Policy Institute Publication (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rivest, R.L., Virza, M.: Software independence revisited. In: Hao, F., Ryan, P.Y.A. (eds.) Real-World Electronic Voting: Design, Analysis and Deployment. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2017). [full citation unavailable]

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rivest, R.L.: On the notion of ‘software independence’ in voting systems. Philos. Trans. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 366(1881), 3759–3767 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht): Use of voting computers in 2005 Bundestag election unconstitutional. Press Release No. 19/2009 of 03 March 2009. https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/EN/2009/bvg09-019.html. Accessed 27 Apr 2017

  41. Schmidt, A., Heinson, D., Langer, L., Opitz-Talidou, Z., Richter, P., Volkamer, M., Buchmann, J.: Developing a legal framework for remote electronic voting. In: Ryan, P.Y.A., Schoenmakers, B. (eds.) Vote-ID 2009. LNCS, vol. 5767, pp. 92–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04135-8_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Enguehard, C.: Transparency in electronic voting: the great challenge. In: IPSA International Political Science Association RC 10 on Electronic Democracy. Conference on “E-democracy - State of the art and future agenda”, Jan 2008, Stellenbosch, South Africa, édition électronique (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Winckler, M., Bernhaupt, R., Palanque, P., Lundin, D., Leach, K., Ryan, P., Alberdi, E., Strigini, L.: Assessing the usability of open verifiable e-voting systems: a trial with the system Prêt à Voter. In: Proceedings of ICE-GOV (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Herrnson, P.S., Niemi, R. G., Hanmer, M.J., Bederson, B.B., Conrad, F.G., Traugott, M.: The importance of usability testing of voting systems. In: Electronic Voting Technology Workshop, Vancouver B.C., Canada, 1 August 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ministerial Declaration on eGovernment. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/sites/digital-agenda/files/ministerial-declaration-on-egovernment-malmo.pdf. Accessed 7 May 2017

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work of Robert Krimmer was supported in parts by the Estonian Research Council project PUT1361 and the Tallinn Univerity of Technology project B42.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department for E-Governance in Administration, Danube University Krems, Krems an der Donau, Austria

    Peter Parycek, Michael Sachs & Shefali Virkar

  2. Ragnar Nurkse Department for Innovation and Governance, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia

    Robert Krimmer

Authors
  1. Peter Parycek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Sachs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shefali Virkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert Krimmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shefali Virkar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia

    Robert Krimmer

  2. Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany

    Melanie Volkamer

  3. German Research Institute for Public Administration, Speyer, Germany

    Nadja Braun Binder

  4. University of Münster, Münster, Germany

    Norbert Kersting

  5. Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain, Belgium

    Olivier Pereira

  6. IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Carsten Schürmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Parycek, P., Sachs, M., Virkar, S., Krimmer, R. (2017). Voting in E-Participation: A Set of Requirements to Support Accountability and Trust by Electoral Committees. In: Krimmer, R., Volkamer, M., Braun Binder, N., Kersting, N., Pereira, O., Schürmann, C. (eds) Electronic Voting. E-Vote-ID 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10615. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68687-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68687-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68686-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68687-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation