Skip to main content

Use of Inverted Triangular Weight Vectors in Decomposition-Based Many-Objective Algorithms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Simulated Evolution and Learning (SEAL 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10593))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A number of decomposition-based algorithms have been proposed for many-objective problems using a set of uniformly distributed weight vectors in the literature. In those algorithms, a many-objective problem is decomposed into single-objective problems. Each single-objective problem is optimized in a cooperative manner with other single-objective problems. Their performance strongly depends on the Pareto front shape of a test problem. This is because weight vectors are generated using a triangular simplex lattice structure. It is easy for decomposition-based algorithms to obtain uniformly distributed solutions on triangular Pareto fronts. However, it is not easy for them to handle non-triangular Pareto fronts such as inverted-triangular and disconnected Pareto fronts. In our former study, we examined the performance of MOEA/D when the triangular simplex lattice structure was replaced with the inverted triangular structure for generating weight vectors. The use of those weight vectors deteriorated the performance of MOEA/D for almost all test problems including those with inverted triangular Pareto fronts. In this paper, we examine the use of the inverted triangular simplex lattice structure in two variants of MOEA/D (MOEA/D-DE and MOEA/D-STM) and other four decomposition-based algorithms (NSGA-III, θ-DEA, MOEA/DD, and Global WASF-GA). Their performance is reported for many-objective problems with triangular and inverted triangular Pareto fronts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Deb, K.: Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Wiley, Chichester (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6, 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., Thiele, L.: SPEA2: improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm. TIK-Report 103, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), Department of Electrical Engineering, ETH, Zurich (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beume, N., Naujoks, B., Emmerich, M.: SMS-EMOA: multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181, 1653–1669 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bader, J., Zitzler, E.: HypE: an algorithm for fast hypervolume-based many-objective optimization. Evol. Comput. 19, 45–76 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, Q., Li, H.: MOEA/D: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 11, 712–731 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, H., Zhang, Q.: Multiobjective optimization problems with complicated Pareto sets, MOEA/D and NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 13, 284–302 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, K., Zhang, Q., Kwong, S., Li, M., Wang, R.: Stable matching-based selection in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18, 909–923 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deb, K., Jain, H.: An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based non-dominated sorting approach, part I: solving problems with box constraints. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18, 577–601 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jain, H., Deb, K.: An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point based non-dominated sorting approach, part II: handling constraints and extending to an adaptive approach. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18, 602–622 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yuan, Y., Xu, H., Wang, B., Yao, X.: A new dominance relation based evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 20, 16–37 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, K., Deb, K., Zhang, Q., Kwong, S.: An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm based on dominance and decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 19, 694–716 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saborido, R., Ruiz, A.B., Luque, M.: Global WASF-GA: an evolutionary algorithm in multiobjective optimization to approximate the whole Pareto optimal front. Evol. Comput. 25, 309–349 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ishibuchi, H., Setoguchi, Y., Masuda, H., Nojima, Y.: Performance of decomposition-based many-objective algorithms strongly depends on Pareto front shapes. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 21, 169–190 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ishibuchi, H., Imada, R., Doi, K., Nojima, Y.: Use of inverted triangular weight vectors in decomposition-based multiobjective algorithms. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Deb, K., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Zitzler, E.: Scalable multi-objective optimization test problems. In: Proceedings of 2013 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 825–830 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Price, K., Storn, R.M., Lampinen, J.A.: Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization. Springer Natural Computing Series, Heidelberg (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. MOEA/DD Code. http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~likw/publications.html. Accessed 15 July 2016

  19. Yuan’s Many-Objective EA Codes. https://github.com/yyxhdy/ManyEAs. Accessed 15 July 2016

  20. jMetal Website. http://jmetal.sourceforge.net/. Accessed 19 May 2017

  21. Ishibuchi, H., Imada, R., Setoguchi, Y., Nojima, Y.: Reference point specification in hypervolume calculation for fair comparison and efficient search. In: Proceedings of 2017 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 585–592 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuke Nojima .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Doi, K., Imada, R., Nojima, Y., Ishibuchi, H. (2017). Use of Inverted Triangular Weight Vectors in Decomposition-Based Many-Objective Algorithms. In: Shi, Y., et al. Simulated Evolution and Learning. SEAL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10593. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68759-9_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68759-9_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68758-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68759-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics