Skip to main content

On the Deployment of Factor Graph Elements to Operate Max-Sum in Dynamic Ambient Environments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10642))

Abstract

Using belief-propagation based algorithms like Max-Sum to solve distributed constraint optimization problems (DCOPs) requires deploying the factor graph elements on which the distributed solution operates. In some utility-based multi-agent settings, this deployment is straightforward. However, when the problem gains in complexity by adding other interaction constraints (like n-ary costs or dependencies), the question of deploying these shared factors arises. Here, we address this problem in the particular case of smart environment configuration (SECP), where several devices (e.g. smart light bulbs) have to coordinate as to reach an optimal configuration (e.g. find the most energy preserving configuration), under some n-ary constraints (e.g. physical models and user preferences). This factor graph deployment problem (FGDP) can be mapped to an optimization problem, then solvable in a centralized manner. But, when dealing with the dynamics of the environment (e.g. new sensed data which activates some rules, adding new devices, etc.) we cannot afford restarting the system or relying on a centralized solver. Thus, the system has to achieve on-line and local deployment adaptations. In this paper, we present some solutions and experiment them on a simulated smart home environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This discovery phase is not discussed in this paper.

  2. 2.

    Such discrepancies in terms of solution method implementation are the reason not to plot computation times.

References

  1. Adams, W.P., Forrester, R.J., Glover, F.W.: Comparisons and enhancement strategies for linearizing mixed 0–1 quadratic programs. Discrete Optim. 1(2), 99–120 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bichot, C.E., Siarry, P. (eds.): Graph Partitioning. Wiley, New York (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Boulle, M.: Compact mathematical formulation for graph partitioning. Optim. Eng. 5(3), 315–333 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bürger, M., Notarstefano, G., Bullo, F., Allgöwer, F.: A distributed simplex algorithm for degenerate linear programs and multi-agent assignments. Automatica 48(9), 2298–2304 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Fan, N., Pardalos, P.M.: Linear and quadratic programming approaches for the general graph partitioning problem. J. Global Optim. 48(1), 57–71 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Farinelli, A., Rogers, A., Jennings, N.R.: Agent-based decentralised coordination for sensor networks using the max-sum algorithm. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 28(3), 337–380 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Farinelli, A., Rogers, A., Petcu, A., Jennings, N.R.: Decentralised coordination of low-power embedded devices using the max-sum algorithm. In: International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2008), pp. 639–646 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fomeni, F.D., Letchford, A.N.: A dynamic programming heuristic for the quadratic Knapsack Problem. INFORMS J. Comput. 26(1), 173–182 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Martins, A.F.T., Figueiredo, M.A.T., Aguiar, P.M.Q., Smith, N.A., Xing, E.P.: AD3: alternating directions dual decomposition for map inference in graphical models. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 16, 495–545 (2015)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitchell, J.E.: Branch-and-cut algorithms for combinatorial optimization problems. Handbook of Applied Optimization, pp. 65–77. Oxford University Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rust, P., Picard, G., Ramparany, F.: Using message-passing DCOP algorithms to solve energy-efficient smart environment configuration problems. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). AAAI Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tarlow, D., Givoni, I.E., Zemel, R.S.: HOP-MAP: efficient message passing with high order potentials. In: Teh, Y.W., Titterington, D.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS-2010), vol. 9, pp. 812–819 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Rust .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rust, P., Picard, G., Ramparany, F. (2017). On the Deployment of Factor Graph Elements to Operate Max-Sum in Dynamic Ambient Environments. In: Sukthankar, G., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J. (eds) Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. AAMAS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10642. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71682-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71682-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71681-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71682-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics