Skip to main content

Video Distribution Networks: Models and Performance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 481 Accesses

Part of the book series: Computer Communications and Networks ((CCN))

Abstract

The creation, distribution and delivery of video content is a sophisticated process with elements like video acquisition, preprocessing and encoding, content production and packaging as well as distribution to customers. IP networks are usually used for the transfer of video signals. The treatment of video content is also very complex, and we have a multidimensional process with elements like content acquisition, content exchange and content distribution. The focus of the chapter is on the presentation of models that can be used to characterize the main elements in a video distribution chain. These models are about video coding and compression, video streaming, video traffic models, energy consumption models, system performance, concepts of performance optimization and QoE- and energy-optimal streaming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. CISCO (2012) IP/MPLS networks: optimize video transport for broadcasters. CISCO

    Google Scholar 

  2. Monnier R, Popescu A, Ljung R (2016) CONVINcE: towards power-optimized video distribution networks. In: 19th International ICIN conference, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bing B (2010) 3D and HD broadband video networking. Artech House, USA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ohm JR. Sullivan GJ, TK Tan (2012) Comparison of the coding efficiency of video coding standards—including high efficiency video coding (HEVC). IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 22(12):1669–1684

    Google Scholar 

  5. VCODEX (2016) Historical timeline of video coding standards and formats. https://www.vcodex.com/historical-timeline-of-video-coding-standards-and-formats

  6. CISCO (2017) Cisco visual networking index: VNI Forecast 2021. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/index.html?dtid=osscdc000283

  7. Zambelli A (2009) IIS smooth streaming technical overview, Microsoft Corporation, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sodagar I (2011) The MPEG-DASH Standard for multimedia streaming over the internet. IEEE Multim (18):62–67

    Google Scholar 

  9. Storage B (2016) Bandwidth and storage. http://www.broadbandchoices.co.uk/guides/internet/watching-tv-online, 2016

  10. Rao A, Lim Y, Barakat K, Legout A, Towsley D, Dabbous W (2011) Network characteristics of video streaming traffic. ACM SIGCOMM

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gelman AD, Halfin S (1991) On buffer requirements for store-and-forward video on demand service circuits. IEEE GLOBECOM

    Google Scholar 

  12. Call for Evidence on Transcoding for Network Distributed Video Coding, Press release from MPEG 119—Torino. http://mpeg.chiariglione.org/

  13. Tanwir S, Perros H (2013) A survey of VBR video traffic models. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 15(4)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tanwir S, Perros H (2014) VBR video traffic models. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  15. Popescu A (2008) Traffic analysis and control in computer communications networks. Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cox DR (1984) Long-range dependence: a review. Iowa State University Press, Iowa, USA

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tanwir S, Perros H (2013) A survey of VBR video traffic models. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 15 (4)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alheraish AA (2004) Autoregressive video conference models. Int J Netw Manage 14(5):329–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Popescu A, e. a. (2016) CONVINcE D1.1.4 Theoretical models, report project CONVINcE, Celtic-Plus 2016. https://www.celticplus.eu/project-convince/

  20. COMBO (2014) Monitoring parameters relation to QoS/QoE and KPIs

    Google Scholar 

  21. Soldani D (2010) Bridging QoE and QoS for mobile broadband networks. ETSI document. http://www.etsi.org/WebSite/NewsandEvents/QoSQoEUserExperience.aspx

  22. Group, Q. O. (2006) Inter-Provider Quality of Service, Quality of Service Working Group

    Google Scholar 

  23. RFC, 4, (2006) IETF—Internet Engineering Task Force, BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs). http://www.rfc-editor.org

  24. Anjum B, Perros H (2015) Bandwidth allocation for video under quality of service constraints. ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-84821-746-1

    Google Scholar 

  25. Heindl A (2001) Decomposition of general tandem queueing networks with MMPP input. Perform Eval 44(4):5–23

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. ETSI-2011 (2011) Environment Engineering (EE) Energy Efficiency of Wireless Access Network Equipment, ETSI

    Google Scholar 

  27. Padhye J (1998) Modeling TCP throughput: a simple model and its empirical validation. In: ACM SIGCOMM 1998, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ravindra K, Ahuja TL (1993) Network flows: theory, algorithms and applications. Prentice-Hall, USA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Constantine B (2011, August) Framework for TCP throughput testing. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments (RFC) 6349, IETF

    Google Scholar 

  30. Qualinet White Paper on Definitions of Quality of Experience. European Network on Quality of Experience in Multimedia Systems and Services (COST Action IC 1003). In: Le Callet P, Möller S, Perkis A (eds) Lausanne, Version 1.2, Novi Sad, March 2013

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fiedler M, Popescu A, Yao Y (2016) QoE-aware sustainable throughput for energy-efficient video streaming. In: IEEE SustainCom conference, Atlanta, Georgia, October 2016

    Google Scholar 

  32. DASH Industry Forum. http://dashif.org/about/

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the European Celtic-Plus project CONVINcE and funded by Finland, France, Sweden and Turkey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian Popescu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Popescu, A., Yao, Y., Fiedler, M., Ducloux, X. (2018). Video Distribution Networks: Models and Performance. In: Popescu, A. (eds) Greening Video Distribution Networks. Computer Communications and Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71718-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71718-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71717-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71718-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics