Skip to main content

The Effect of Uncertainty and Quality Perception on the Usage of Forecasting Tools – A Game Based Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Games and Learning Alliance (GALA 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10653))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Forecasting tools are used in many areas of application to improve the decision making. But often, decision makers do not follow the forecast. This behavior is only desirable in situations when the forecast is faulty or does not consider all information. Otherwise, it bears suboptimal decisions. This paper investigates under which circumstances decision makers rely on or discard forecasts. In particular, the degree of uncertainty is in the focus. Results show that the more uncertain the decision situation is, the more a decision maker relies on the forecast if it contradicts his own estimation. The more the situation seems to be clear, the more he relies on his own estimation. Then, a faulty forecast can even confirm the decision maker to opt for a wrong decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aziz, R.A., Manap, J.A.: Forecasting practice and perception of forecasting in a Government-Funded Malaysian University. J. Acc. Bus. Manage. 2, 94–107 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berinato, S.: What went wrong at Cisco. CIO Mag. 8, 52–62 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deshpande, R., Zaltman, G.: Factors affecting the use of market research information: a path analysis. J. Mark. Res. 19, 14–31 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fildes, R., Hastings, R.: The organization and improvement of market forecasting. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 45(1), 1–16 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gaynor, L.M., Kelton, A.S.: The effects of analyst forecasts and earnings trends on perceptions of management forecast credibility. Acc. Finance 54(1), 189–210 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Glaum, M., Schnürer, K., Schmidt, P.: What determines managers’ perceptions of cash flow forecasting quality? Evidence from a multinational corporation. J. Int. Financ. Manage. Acc. 3, 298–346 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hogan, J.L., Risher, R.H., Morrison, B.J.: Social feedback and cooperative game behavior. Psychol. Rep. 34(3), 1075–1082 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, W.: The use of management forecasts to dampen analysts’ expectations by Chinese listed firms. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 45, 263–272 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Juanchich, M., Sirota, M.: How to improve people’s interpretation of probabilities of precipitation. J. Risk Res. 3, 388–404 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lo, A.W., Repin, D.V.: The psychophysiology of real-time financial risk processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14(3), 323–339 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lo, A.W., Repin, D.V., Steenbarger, B.N.: Fear and greed in financial markets: a clinical study of day-traders, No. w11243. National Bureau of Economic Research (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lucarelli, C., Brighetti, G., Uberti, P.: Misclassifications in financial risk tolerance. J. Risk Res. 4, 467–482 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maines, L., Hand, J.R.M.: Individuals’ perceptions and misperceptions of time series properties of quarterly earnings. Acc. Rev. 71, 317–336 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mentzer, J.T., Bienstock, C.C., Kahn, K.B.: Benchmarking sales forecasting management. Bus. Horiz. 42(3), 48–56 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moon, M.A., Mentzer, J.T., Smith, C.D.: Conducting a sales forecasting audit. Int. J. Forecast. 19(1), 5–25 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Morford, Z.H., Witts, B.N., Killingsworth, K.J., Alavosius, M.P.: Gamification: the intersection between behavior analysis and game design technologies. Behav. Analyst 37(1), 25–40 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Musthag, M., Raij, A., Ganesan, D., Kumar, S., Shiffman, S.: Exploring micro-incentive strategies for participant compensation in high-burden studies. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 435–444. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. O’Connor, R.E., Yarnal, B., Dow, K., Jocoy, C.L., Carbone, G.J.: Feeling at risk matters: water managers and the decision to use forecasts. Risk Anal. 25(5), 1265–1275 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Remus, W.: Graduate students as surrogates for managers in experiments on business decision making. J. Bus. Res. 14(1), 19–25 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rupar, K.: Significance of forecast precision: the importance of investors’ expectations. Contemp. Acc. Res. 2, 849–870 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sarens, G., D’Onza, G.: The perception of financial analysts on risk, risk management, and internal control disclosure: evidence from Belgium and Italy. Int. J. Discl. Gov. 2, 118–138 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Seaborn, K., Fels, D.I.: Gamification in theory and action: a survey. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 74, 14–31 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Simon, H.A.: Models of Man; Social and Rational. Wiley, New York (1957)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith, C.D., Mentzer, J.T.: User influence on the relationship between forecast accuracy, application and logistics performance. J. Bus. Logistics 1, 159–177 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stock, J.R., Lambert, D.M.: Strategic Logistics Management, vol. 4. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Boston (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stone, D.N.: The joint effects of DSS feedback and users’ expectations on decision processes and performance. J. Inform. Syst. 1, 23–41 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wheelwright, S.C., Clarke, D.G.: Corporate forecasting: promise and reality. Harvard Bus. Rev. 54(6), 40–64 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Siepermann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lackes, R., Siepermann, M., Vetter, G. (2017). The Effect of Uncertainty and Quality Perception on the Usage of Forecasting Tools – A Game Based Analysis. In: Dias, J., Santos, P., Veltkamp, R. (eds) Games and Learning Alliance. GALA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10653. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71940-5_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71940-5_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71939-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71940-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics