Skip to main content

Network Analysis of the Science of Science: A Case Study in SOFSEM Conference

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10706))

Abstract

A rising issue in the scientific community entails the identification of temporal patterns in the evolution of the scientific enterprise and the emergence of trends that influence scholarly impact. In this direction, this paper investigates the mechanism with which citation accumulation occurs over time and how this affects the overall impact of scientific output. Utilizing data regarding the SOFSEM Conference (International Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Computer Science), we study a corpus of 1006 publications with their associated authors and affiliations to uncover the effects of collaboration network on the conference output. We proceed to group publications into clusters based on the trajectories they follow in their citation acquisition. Representative patterns are identified to characterize dominant trends of the conference, while exploring phenomena of early and late recognition by the scientific community and their correlation with impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://link.springer.com/conference/sofsem.

  2. 2.

    The SOFSEM 2003 proceedings are not listed in DBLP and thus omitted from this study.

  3. 3.

    https://apps.webofknowledge.com/.

  4. 4.

    https://www.scopus.com/.

  5. 5.

    https://scholar.google.com.

  6. 6.

    http://academic.research.microsoft.com/.

  7. 7.

    http://github.com/flaviovdf/pyksc.

References

  1. Börner, K., Dall’Asta, L., Ke, W., Vespignani, A.: Studying the emerging global brain: analyzing and visualizing the impact of co-authorship teams. Complexity 10(4), 57–67 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bourbaki, N., Eggleston, H., Madan, S.: Topological Vector Spaces. Éléments de mathématique. Springer, Heidelberg (1987)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Chakraborty, T., Kumar, S., Goyal, P., Ganguly, N., Mukherjee, A.: Towards a stratified learning approach to predict future citation counts. In: Proceedings 14th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), pp. 351–360 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chakraborty, T., Kumar, S., Goyal, P., Ganguly, N., Mukherjee, A.: On the categorization of scientific citation profiles in computer science. Communi. ACM 58(9), 82–90 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clough, J.R., Evans, T.S.: Time and citation networks. In: Proceedings 16th Conference of the International Society of Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T.N., van Raan, A.F.: Is scientific literature subject to a ‘sell-by-date’? A general methodology to analyze the “durability” of scientific documents. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 61(2), 329–339 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Davletov, F., Aydin, A.S., Cakmak, A.: High impact academic paper prediction using temporal and topological features. In: Proceedings 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information & Knowledge Management (CIKM), pp. 491–498 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Publish or perish: Editorial. Nature 467, 252–252 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Egghe, L., Bornmann, L., Guns, R.: A proposal for a first-citation-speed-index. J. Informetrics 5(1), 181–186 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Garfield, E.: The application of citation indexing to journals management. Curr. Contents 33, 3–5 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gonçalves, G.D., Figueiredo, F., Almeida, J.M., Gonçalves, M.A.: Characterizing scholar popularity: a case study in the computer science research community. In: Proceedings IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), pp. 57–66 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harzing, A., Alakangas, S.: Google scholar, scopus and the web of science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics 106(2), 787–804 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ke, Q., Ferrara, E., Radicchi, F., Flammini, A.: Defining and identifying sleeping beauties in science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112(24), 7426–7431 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ley, M.: DBLP: some lessons learned. Proc. VLDB Endowment 2(2), 1493–1500 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mazloumian, A., Eom, Y., Helbing, D., Lozano, S., Fortunato, S.: How citation boosts promote scientific paradigm shifts and nobel prizes. PLoS ONE 6(5), 1–6 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Paparrizos, J., Gravano, L.: \(k\)-shape: efficient and accurate clustering of time series. In: Proceedings ACM International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), pp. 1855–1870 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Revesz, P.Z.: A method for predicting citations to the scientific publications of individual researchers. In: Proceedings 18th International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium (IDEAS), pp. 9–18 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rochat, Y.: Closeness centrality extended to unconnected graphs: the harmonic centrality index. In: ASNA, No. EPFL-CONF-200525 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sun, J., Min, C., Li, J.: A vector for measuring obsolescence of scientific articles. Scientometrics 107(2), 745–757 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wildgaard, L., Schneider, J.W., Larsen, B.: A review of the characteristics of \(108\) author-level bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics 101(1), 125–158 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wolcott, H.N., Fouch, M.J., Hsu, E.R., DiJoseph, L.G., Bernaciak, C.A., Corrigan, J.G., Williams, D.E.: Modeling time-dependent and-independent indicators to facilitate identification of breakthrough research papers. Scientometrics 107(2), 807–817 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang, J., Leskovec, J.: Patterns of temporal variation in online media. In: Proceedings 4th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), pp. 177–186 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonia Gogoglou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gogoglou, A., Tsikrika, T., Manolopoulos, Y. (2018). Network Analysis of the Science of Science: A Case Study in SOFSEM Conference. In: Tjoa, A., Bellatreche, L., Biffl, S., van Leeuwen, J., Wiedermann, J. (eds) SOFSEM 2018: Theory and Practice of Computer Science. SOFSEM 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10706. Edizioni della Normale, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73117-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73117-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Edizioni della Normale, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73116-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73117-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics