Abstract
In the field of language technology, researchers are starting to pay more attention to various interactional aspects of language – a development prompted by a confluence of factors, and one which applies equally to the processing of written and spoken language. Notably, the so-called ‘phatic’ aspects of linguistic communication are coming into focus in this work, where linguistic interaction is increasingly recognized as being fundamentally situated. This development resonates well with the concerns of third wave HCI, which involves a shift in focus from stating the requirements on HCI design primarily in terms of “context-free” information flow, to a view where it is recognized that HCI – just like interaction among humans – is indissolubly embedded in complex, shifting contexts. These – together with the different backgrounds and intentions of interaction participants – shape the interaction in ways which are not readily understandable in terms of rational information exchange, but which are nevertheless central aspects of the interaction, and which therefore must be taken into account in HCI design, including its linguistic aspects, forming the focus of this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The relationship between LT and linguistics is a complex one (Reiter 2007; Jones 2007; Wintner 2009), but since the subject matter of both is human language and linguistic behavior, and since they share a common heritage, including a nontrivial set of ontological and methodological assumptions, they nevertheless tend to come up against the same problems.
- 2.
There is now also an emerging field of sign language technology, dealing with the problems of processing the various signed languages of the Deaf (the Ethnologue lists no less than 177 sign languages worldwide; Simons and Fennig 2017). This field is still very much in its infancy, and we will not be able to discuss it further here.
- 3.
To confuse matters further, LT – especially the written-language kind – is often treated as belonging to the field of artificial intelligence (AI), and in fact the three cases of communication breakdown mentioned at the beginning of this chapter have generally been reported as failures of AI. There is no doubt that these involve specifically LT, and also no doubt that LT is a thriving scientific discipline in its own right, with numerous conferences and journals.
- 4.
Addressed in Sect. 3.1.
- 5.
Addressed in Sect. 3.2.
- 6.
Some well-known examples are the continental Nordic (or Scandinavian) languages Danish, Norwegian and Swedish; Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian; Bulgarian and Macedonian; Hindi and Urdu; and others.
References
Anderson B (2006) Imagined communities, 2nd edn. Verso, London
Bamman D, Eisenstein J, Schnoebelen T (2014) Gender identity and lexical variation in social media. J Socioling 18(2):135–160
Bernstein B (1973) Class, codes and control. Volume 1: Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. Paladin, St Albans
Bickerton D (1990) Language & species. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Bødker S (2006) When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction: changing roles. ACM, Oslo, pp 1–8
Bødker S (2015) Third-wave HCI, 10 years later—participation and sharing. Interactions 22(5):24–31
Clavel C, Callejas Z (2016) Sentiment analysis: from opinion mining to human-agent interaction. IEEE Trans Affect Comput 7(1):74–93
Coupland J, Coupland N, Robinson JD (1992) “How are you?”: negotiating phatic communion. Lang Soc 21:207–230
Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London
Dourish P (2004) What we talk about when we talk about context. Pers Ubiquit Comput 8(1):19–30
Doyle G, Goldberg A, Srivastava S, Frank M (2017) Alignment at work: using language to distinguish the internalization and self-regulation components of cultural fit in organizations. In: Proceedings of ACL 2017. ACL, Vancouver, pp 603–612
Dunbar RIM (1996) Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Dunbar RIM (2004) Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Rev Gen Psychol 8(2):100–110
Eisenstein J (2015) Systematic patterning in phonologically-motivated orthographic variation. J Socioling 19(2):161–188
Hansegård NE (1968) Tvåspråkighet eller halvspråkighet. Bonniers, Stockholm
Hansegård NE (1990) Den norrbottensfinska språkfrågan: En återblick på halvspråkighetsdebatten Uppsala universitet, Centrum för multietnisk forskning, Uppsala
Harrison S, Sengers P, Tatar D (2007) The three paradigms of HCI, presentation at the Alt. Chi session at the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems San Jose, CA
Harrison S, Sengers P, Tatar D (2011) Making epistemological trouble: third-paradigm HCI as successor science. Interact Comput 23:385–392
Horton H (2016) Microsoft deletes ‘teen girl’ AI after it became a Hitler-loving sex robot within 24 hours. The Telegraph Published online 2016–03–24. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/03/24/microsofts-teen-girl-ai-turns-into-a-hitler-loving-sex-robot-wit/. Accessed on 10 Aug 2017
Hutchby I, Wooffitt R (1998) Conversation analysis. Polity Press, Cambridge
Jönsson A, Dahlbäck N (1988) Talking to a computer is not like talking to your best friend. Scandinavian conference on artificial intelligence (SCAI’88). IOS, Tromsø
Jakobson R (1960) Closing statement: linguistics and poetics. In: Sebeok TA (ed) Style in language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 350–377
Jakobson R, Fant G, Halle M (1951) Preliminaries to speech analysis. The disctinctive features and their correlates, Techical report. MIT, Cambridge, MA
Jokinen K, McTear M (2009) Spoken dialogue systems. Synth Lect Hum Lang Technol 2(1):1–151
Jones KS (2007) Last words: computational linguistics: what about the linguistics? Comput Linguist 33(3):437
Jones PE (2013) Bernstein’s ‘codes’ and the linguistics of ‘deficit’. Lang Educ 27(2):161–179
Jurgens D, Tsvetkov Y, Jurafsky D (2017) Incorporating dialectal variability for socially equitable language identification. In: Proceedings of ACL 2017. ACL, Vancouver, pp 51–57
King B, Abney S (2013) Labeling the languages of words in mixed-language documents using weakly supervised methods. In: Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2013. ACL, Atlanta, pp 1110–1119
LaFrance A (2017) An artificial intelligence developed its own non-human language. The Atlantic Published online 2017-06-15; https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/06/artificial-intelligence-develops-its-own-non-human-language/530436/. Accessed on 10 Aug 2017
Laver J (1975) Communicative functions of phatic communion. In: Kendon A, Har-ris RM, Key MR (eds) Organization of behavior in face-to-face interaction. Mouton, The Hague, pp 215–238
Linell P (1982) The written language bias in linguistics. University of Linköping, Department of Communication Studies, Linköping
Lui M, Lau JH, Baldwin T (2014) Automatic detection and language identification of multilingual documents. Trans Assoc Comput Linguist 2:27–40
Malinowski B (1923) The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In: Ogden CK, Richards IA (eds) The meaning of meaning. K. Paul, Trend, Trubner, London, pp 296–336
Martin-Jones M, Romaine S (1986) Semilingualism: a half-baked theory of communicative competence. Appl Ling 7(1):26–38
Miller V (2008) New media, networking and phatic culture. Convergence 14(4):387–400
Monk A (2003) Common ground in electronically mediated communication: Clark’s theory of language use. In: Carroll JM (ed) HCI models, theories, and frameworks: toward a multidisciplinary science. Morgan Kaufmann, San Fran-cisco, pp 265–289
Pang B, Lee L (2008) Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found Trends Inf Retr 2(1–2):1–135
Pavalanathan U, Eisenstein J (2015) Audience-modulated variation in online social media. Am Speech 90(2):187–213
Pavalanathan U, Fitzpatrick J, Kiesling S, Eisenstein J (2017) A multidimensional lexicon for interpersonal stancetaking. In: Proceedings of ACL 2017. ACL, Vancouver, pp 884–895
Qvarfordt P (2004) Eyes on multimodal interaction. PhD thesis, Linköping University, Department of Computer Science
Reiter E (2007) Last words: the shrinking horizons of computational linguistics. Comput Linguist 33(2):283
Rutten G (2016) Historicizing diaglossia. J Socioling 20(1):6–30
Sacks H (1992) Lectures on conversation. Vols. I & II, Jefferson G (ed). Basil Blackwell, Oxford
Senft G (2009) Phatic communion. In: Östman JO, Verschueren J (eds) Culture and language use. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 215–238
Shneiderman B, Maes P (1997) Direct manipulation vs. interface agents. Interactions 4(6):42–61
Sidnell J, Stivers T (eds) (2013) The handbook of conversation analysis. Wiley Blackwell, Chichester
Smith, D (2013) IBM’s Watson gets a ‘swear filter’ after learning the urban dictionary. International Business Times. Published online 2013-01-10; http://www.ibtimes.com/ibms-watson-gets-swear-filter-after-learning-urban-dictionary-1007734. Accessed on 10 Aug 2017
Solorio T, Liu Y (2008) Learning to predict code-switching points. In: Proceedings of EMNLP 2008. ACL, Honolulu, pp 973–981
Spolsky B (2004) Language policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. .
Stam JH (1976) Inquiries into the origin of languages. Harper & Row, New York
Stenström AB, Jörgensen AM (2008) A matter of politeness? A contrastive study of phatic talk in teenage conversation. Pragmatics 18(4):635–657
Tsytsarau M, Palpanas T (2012) Survey on mining subjective data on the web. Data Min Knowl Disc 24:478–514
Vetere F, Howard S, Gibbs MR (2005) Phatic technologies: sustaining sociability through ubiquitous computing. In: CHI’05 workshop – first international workshop on social implications of ubiquitous computing at the 23th international conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, Portland
Wang V, Tucker JV, Rihll TE (2011) On phatic technologies for creating and main-taining human relationships. Technol Soc 33:44–51
Wikipedia (2017) Tay (bot). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tay_(bot). Accessed on 10 Aug 2017
Wintner S (2009) Last words: what science underlies natural language engineering? Comput Linguist 35(4), doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/coli.2009.35.4.35409, http: //aclanthology.coli.uni-saarland.de/pdf/J/J09/J09-4012.pdf., 641
Yamaguchi H, Tanaka-Ishii K (2012) Text segmentation by language using minimum description length. In: Proceedings of ACL 2012. ACL, Jeju Island, pp 969–978
Žegarac V, Clark B (1999) Phatic interpretations and phatic communication. J Linguist 35(2):321–346
Simons GF, Fennig CD (2017) Ethnologue: languages of the world, 20th edn. SIL International, Dallas. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com
Acknowledgements
The work on this chapter has been made possible by financial support from several sources: the Swedish Research Council through its funding of the Towards a Knowledge-based Culturomics Research Program and Swe-Clarin, the Swedish node of the European CLARIN ERIC research infrastructure, as well as the University of Gothenburg through its funding of the Språkbanken research infrastructure.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Borin, L., Edlund, J. (2018). Language Technology and 3rd Wave HCI: Towards Phatic Communication and Situated Interaction. In: Filimowicz, M., Tzankova, V. (eds) New Directions in Third Wave Human-Computer Interaction: Volume 1 - Technologies. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73356-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73356-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73355-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73356-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)