Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of methodological approaches and current work in the evaluation of user engagement (UE). Using a series of propositions about the nature of engagement, I review a selection of recent research that utilizes varied methodological approaches to study UE in various human-computer interaction settings. The propositions and the reviewed literature are used to propose a methodological framework to guide decision making and reflection regarding how UE will be evaluated in a given context. The chapter concludes with reflections on broader issues related to how researchers’ methodological stances influence the evaluation of UE. Overall, the chapter argues that UE should be measured using a thoughtful mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, considering the particulars of the use context, and balancing established and emerging subjective and objective metrics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
References
Absar R, O’Brien H, Webster ET (2014) Exploring social context in mobile information behavior. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Seattle, WA, 31 October – 5 November 2014
Agarwal R, Karahanna E (2000) Time flies when you're having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart 24(4):665–694
Andujar M, Morreale P, Jimenez Y, Jimenez L, Gilbert JE (2017) Evaluation of user’s affective engagement while interacting with educational technologies: a pilot study. In: Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 97–105
Anzalone SM, Boucenna S, Ivaldi S, Chetouani M (2015) Evaluating the engagement with social robots. Int J Soc Robot 7(4):465–478
Aristeidou M (2016) Citizen inquiry: engaging citizens in online communities of scientific inquiries. Dissertation, Institute of Educational Technology
Bagnara S, Pozzi S (2016) The third wave of human computer interaction: from interfaces to digital ecologies. DigitCult 1(1):59–65
Bødker S (2015) Third-wave HCI, 10 years later—participation and sharing. Interactions 22(5):24–31
de Guinea AO, Titah R, Léger PM, Micheneau T (2012) Neurophysiological correlates of information systems commonly used self-reported measures: a multitrait multimethod study. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), IEEE, Maui, HI, 4–7 January 2012, pp. 562–571
Flores FDN (2016) Engaging emerging adults in the design process of technology driven health interventions. Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin-Madison
Freund L, Kopak R, O’Brien H (2016) The effects of textual environment on reading comprehension: implications for searching as learning. J Inf Sci 42(1):79–93
Gosling SD, Rentfrow PJ, Swann WB (2003) A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. J Res Pers 37(6):504–528
Harrison S, Tatar D, Sengers P (2007) The three paradigms of HCI. In: Alt. Chi. session at SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, CA, 28 April – 3 May, 2007
Jacques RD (1996) The nature of engagement and its role in hypermedia evaluation and design. Dissertation, South Bank University, London
Jacques R, Preece J, Carey T (1995) Engagement as a design concept for multimedia. Can J Educ Commun 24(1):49–59
Jensen ML, Lee YH, Piercy CW, Dunbar NE, Elizondo J, Bessarabova E, Twyman NW, Burgoon JK, Valacich JS, Adame B, Miller C (2016) Exploring failure and engagement in a complex digital training game: a multi-method examination. AIS Trans Hum Comput Int 8(1):1–20
Lalmas M, O'Brien HL, Yom-Tov E (2014) Measuring user engagement. Syn Lect Inform Concept Retr Serv 6(4):1–132
Laurel B (1993) Computers as theatre. Addison-Wesley, Boston
Lebow M, O’Brien HL (2012) Is there a role for physiological methods in the evaluation of human-information interaction? https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0107446. Accessed 15 May 2017
Leiker AM, Miller M, Brewer L, Nelson M, Siow M, Lohse K (2016) The relationship between engagement and neurophysiological measures of attention in motion-controlled video games: a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Serious Games 4(1):e4. https://doi.org/10.2196/games.5460
Li C, Rusak Z, Horvath I, Kooijman A, Ji L (2016) Implementation and validation of engagement monitoring in an engagement enhancing rehabilitation system. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 99:726. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2591183
Lohse KR, Boyd LA, Hodges NJ (2016) Engaging environments enhance motor skill learning in a computer gaming task. J Motor Behav 48(2):172–182
Martey RM, Kenski K, Folkestad J, Feldman L, Gordis E, Shaw A, Stromer-Galley J, Clegg B, Zhang H, Kaufman N, Rabkin AN (2014) Measuring game engagement: multiple methods and construct complexity. Simulat Gaming 45(4–5):528–547
Mathur A, Lane ND, Kawsar F (2016) September. Engagement-aware computing: modelling user engagement from mobile contexts. In: Proceedings of the ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing, Heidelberg, Germany, 12–16 September 2016, pp. 622–633
McAuley E, Duncan T, Tammen VV (1989) Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. Res Q Exercise Sport 60(1):48–58
McCarthy J, Wright P (2004) Technology as experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Meza-Kubo V, Morán AL, Carrillo I, Galindo G, García-Canseco E (2016) Assessing the user experience of older adults using a neural network trained to recognize emotions from brain signals. J Biomed Inform 62:202–209
Nguyen C (2015) Understanding user engagement in the open collaboration model of crowdsourcing. Dissertation, University of Nebraska at Omaha
O’Brien HL (2008) Defining and measuring engagement in user experiences with technology. Ph.D. dissertation, Dalhousie University, Canada. http://ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/login?url=; https://search-proquestcomezproxy.library.ubc.ca/docview/304405933?accountid=14656. Accessed 3 Apr 2018
O’Brien HL (2011) Exploring user engagement in online news interactions. In: Proceedings of the association for information science and technology, New Orleans, LA, 9–12 October 2011
O’Brien HL (2016a) Theoretical perspectives on user engagement. In: O’Brien HL, Cairns P (eds) Why engagement matters: cross disciplinary perspectives on user engagement, springer international publishing. Springer, Cham, pp 1–26
O’Brien HL (2016b) Translating theory into methodological practice. In: O’Brien HL, Cairns P (eds) Why engagement matters: cross disciplinary perspectives on user engagement, springer international publishing. Springer, Cham, pp 27–52
O’Brien HL, Cairns P (2015) An empirical evaluation of the User Engagement Scale (UES) in online news environments. Inform Process Manag 51(4):413–427
O’Brien HL, Lebow M (2013) Mixed-methods approach to measuring user experience in online news interactions. J Assoc Inf Sci Tech 64(8):1543–1556
O’Brien HL, McKay-Peet L (2017) Asking good questions: questionnaire design and analysis in interactive information retrieval research. In: Proceedings of the conference on conference human information interaction and retrieval, Oslo, Norway, 7–12 March, pp. 27–36
O’Brien HL, Toms EG (2008) What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. J Assoc Inf Sci Tech 59(6):938–955
O’Brien HL, Toms EG (2010) The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. J Assoc Inf Sci Tech 61(1):50–69
O’Brien HL, Freund L, Kopak R (2016) Investigating the role of user engagement in digital reading environments. In: Proceedings of the ACM on conference on human information interaction and retrieval, Carrboro, NC, 13–17 March 2017, pp. 71–80
Ponciano L, Brasileiro F (2015) Finding volunteers’ engagement profiles in human computation for citizen science projects. arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.02134. Accessed 15 May 2017
Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18(6):643–662
Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54(6):1063–1070
Webster J, Ho H (1997) Audience engagement in multimedia presentations. ACM SIGMIS Database 28(2):63–77
Yardley L, Spring BJ, Riper H, Morrison LG, Crane DH, Curtis K, Merchant GC, Naughton F, Blandford A (2016) Understanding and promoting effective engagement with digital behavior change interventions. Am J Prev Med 51(5):833–842
Zhang J, Hamilton WL, Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil C, Jurafsky D, Leskovec J (2017) Community identity and user engagement in a multi-community landscape. In: Proceedings of the interactional conference on web and social media, Montreal, QC, 15–18 May 2017
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank the Social Science and Humanities Council of Canada (SSHRC), the UBC Hampton Research Fund, and the Networks of Centres of Excellent Graphics, Animation and New Media Project (NCE GRAND) for generous funding support over the past several years. I would also like to acknowledge the colleagues – including and especially graduate students at the School of Library, Archival and Information Studies – who have worked with me over the years on various research projects for their insights, efforts, dedication and enthusiasm.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Brien, H.L. (2018). A Holistic Approach to Measuring User Engagement. In: Filimowicz, M., Tzankova, V. (eds) New Directions in Third Wave Human-Computer Interaction: Volume 2 - Methodologies . Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73374-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73374-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73373-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73374-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)