Abstract
The approximate constructions using duo ‘more’ in Chinese present some interesting puzzles for compositional semantics. This paper attempts to unveil the lexical semantics of duo by investigating its distribution and interpretation in approximate constructions. It is claimed that: (i) the distribution of duo is governed by a monotonicity restriction, that is, its domain must be defined by some mereological part-whole relations; (ii) duo is an additive particle whose semantics involves the arithmetic operations of addition (+) and multiplication (×). This novel account provides a more motivated account of the seemingly complicated distributional patterns of duo approximate expressions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, C.: Numerical approximation using some. In: Csipak, E. and Zeijlstra, H. (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19, 54-70 (2016).
Bale, A., Barner, D.: The interpretation of functional heads: using comparatives to explore the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics 26, 217-252 (2009).
Champollion, L., Krifka, M.:Mereology. In: Dekker, P. and Aloni, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 369-388 (2016).
Cheng, L., Sybesma, R.: Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 509-542 (1999).
Lü, S.-X: Zaishuo ‘lai’ yiji ‘duo’ he ‘ban’ (“Further remarks on lai ‘about’ and duo ‘many/much’, ban ‘half’). Zhongguo Yuwen (Chinese Philology) (1957). Reprinted in Lü, S.-X: Hanyu Yufa Lunji (Papers on Chinese Grammar)(1984). The Commercial Press, Beijing, China. [In Chinese]
Lü, S.-X, et al. (eds.): Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci (“Eight Hundred Words in Mondern Chinese”) (Revised Edition). The Commercial Press, Beijing, China (1999). [In Chinese]
Luo, Q., Hsieh, M.-L., Shi, D.: Pre-classifier adjectival modification in Mandarin Chinese: a measurement-based analysis. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 26, 1-36 (2017).
Sassoon, G. W.: Measurement theory in linguistics. Synthese 174, 151-180 (2010).
Sauerland, U., Stateva, P.: Scalar vs. epistemic vagueness: evidence from approximators. In: Gibson, M. and Friedman, T. (eds.), Proceedings of Semantic and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 17. CLC publications, Ithaca, NY (2007).
Schwarzschild, R.: The role of dimensions in the syntax of noun phrases. Syntax 9, 67-110 (2006).
Solt, S.: Q-Adjectives and the semantics of quantity. Journal of Semantics 32, 221-273 (2015).
Welllwood, A.: On the semantics of comparison across categories. Linguistics and Philosophy 38, 67-101(2015).
Wellwood, A. et al: Measuring and comparing individuals and events. Journal of Semantics 29, 207-228 (2012).
Zhang, N.: Classifier Structures in Mandarin Chinese. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany (2013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Luo, Q. (2018). Approximate Constructions Using duo ‘more’ in Chinese. In: Wu, Y., Hong, JF., Su, Q. (eds) Chinese Lexical Semantics. CLSW 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10709. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73573-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73573-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73572-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73573-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)