Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

OTM Confederated International Conferences "On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems"

OTM 2017: On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2017 Workshops pp 66–75Cite as

A User-Centered Perspective on Interoperability: Capturing Stakeholder Interaction for Mediating Design

  • Conference paper

  • 1114 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10697))

Abstract

When recognizing the need of involving stakeholders for mapping role-specific requirements to system behavior, semantic interoperability is becoming a crucial issue in development. Elicitation, analysis, and specification need to go beyond a purely functional perspective on system development and integrate interactions relevant for stakeholders. We discuss a behavior perspective to mutually adjust role-specific elements, and in this way design organization-relevant support systems. Since interacting role element specifications can be automatically executed, designs can be evaluated interactively, and digital support systems can be developed incrementally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Leonhard, G., Kospoth, C.-A.G.: Exponential technology versus linear humanity: designing a sustainable future. In: Osburg, T., Lohrmann, C. (eds.) Sustainability in a Digital World, pp. 77–83. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54603-2_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Jia, Y.J., Chen, Q.A., Wang, S., et al.: ContexIoT: towards providing contextual integrity to appified IoT platforms. In: Juels, A. (ed.) Proceedings 2017 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium. Internet Society, Reston (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shelley, C.: Social agendas. In: Shelley, C. (ed.) Design and Society: Social Issues in Technological Design. SAPERE, vol. 36, pp. 105–124. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52515-0_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Dyba, T., Cruzes, D.S.: Process research in requirements elicitation. In: 3rd International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE), pp. 36–39. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenkranz, C., Vranesic, H., Holten, R.: Boundary interactions and motors of change in requirements elicitation: a dynamic perspective on knowledge sharing. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 15(6), 306–345 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Accenture: Trend reports (2017). https://www.accenture.com/de-de/insight-disruptive-technology-trends-2017?c=ad_gigermanyFY17_10002002&n=bac_0317, https://www.accenture.com/de-de/company-news-release-fjord-trends-2017?c=ad_gigermanyFY17_10002009&n=bac_0317. Accessed 23 Jul 2017

  7. Ames, M.G., Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., et al.: Making cultures. In: Jones, M., Palanque, P., Schmidt, A., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA 2014), pp. 1087–1092. ACM Press, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hess, J., Randall, D., Pipek, V., et al.: Involving users in the wild—participatory product development in and with online communities. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 71(5), 570–589 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller, T., Lu, B., Sterling, L., et al.: Requirements elicitation and specification using the agent paradigm: the case study of an aircraft turnaround simulator. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 40(10), 1007–1024 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2014.2339827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oppl, S.: Towards scaffolding collaborative articulation and alignment of mental models. Procedia Comput. Sci. 99, 125–145 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schneider, F., Bruegge, B., Berenbach, B.: The unified requirements modeling language: shifting the focus to early requirements elicitation. In: 3rd International Workshop on Comparing Requirements Modeling Approaches (CMA@RE), pp. 31–36. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Seyff, N., Todoran, I., Caluser, K., et al.: Using popular social network sites to support requirements elicitation, prioritization and negotiation. J. Internet Serv. Appl. 6(1), 75 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13174-015-0021-9

  13. Vitharana, P., Zahedi, F., Jain, H.K.: Enhancing analysts’ mental models for improving requirements elicitation: a two-stage theoretical framework and empirical results. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 17(12), 804–840 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fleischmann, A., Schmidt, W., Stary, C., et al.: Subject-Oriented Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32392-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Fleischmann, A., Stary, C.: Whom to talk to? A stakeholder perspective on business process development. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 11(2), 125–150 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0236-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fleischmann, A., Schmidt, W., Stary, C.: Subject-oriented BPM = socially executable BPM. In: IEEE 15th Conference on Business Informatics, pp. 399–407. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fleischmann, A., Schmidt, W., Stary, C.: S-BPM in the Wild: Practical Value Creation. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17542-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Neubauer, M., Stary, C.: S-BPM in the Production Industry: A Stakeholder Approach. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48466-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Eberle, P., Schwarzinger, C., Stary, C.: User modelling and cognitive user support: towards structured development. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 10(3), 275–293 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-010-0210-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stary, C., Stary, E.: Creating meaningful representations. J. Inf. Knowl. Manage. 12(04), 13 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1142/s021964921350041x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stary, C., Krenn, F., Lerchner, H., et al.: Towards stakeholder-centered design of open systems. In: de Greef, T., Marasek, K., Dittmar, A., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2015 (ECCE 2015). ACM Press, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Resnick, M., Bruckman, A., Martin, F.: Pianos not stereos: creating computational construction kits. Interactions 3(5), 40–50 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1145/234757.234762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Slavin, R., Lehker, J.-M., Niu, J., et al.: Managing security requirements patterns using feature diagram hierarchies. In: IEEE 22nd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 193–202. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Frank, M.: Engineering systems thinking: cognitive competencies of successful systems engineers. Procedia Comput. Sci. 8, 273–278 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.01.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Weichhart, G., Stary, C.: Traceable pedagogical design rationales for personalized learning technologies. Int. J. People Oriented Program. 3(2), 25–55 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4018/ijpop.2014070102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Weichhart, G., Stary, C., Vernadat, F.B.: Enterprise modeling for the interoperable and knowledge-based enterprise. Int. J. Prod. Res. 55, 1–23 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Raz, A.K., DeLaurentis, D.A.: A system-of-systems perspective on information fusion systems: architecture representation and evaluation. In: AIAA Infotech @ Aerospace, AIAA SciTech Forum (AIAA 2015-0644) (2015). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-0644

  28. Zacharewicz, G., Diallo, S., Ducq, Y., et al.: Model-based approaches for interoperability of next generation enterprise information systems: State of the art and future challenges. Inf. Syst. e-Bus. Manage. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-016-0317-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Weichhart, G., Stary, C.: A domain specific language for organisational interoperability. In: Ciuciu, I., et al. (eds.) OTM 2015. LNCS, vol. 9416, pp. 117–126. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26138-6_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Bezerianos, A., McEwan, G.: Presence disparity in mixed presence collaboration. In: Czerwinski, M., Lund, A., Tan, D. (eds.) Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Annual CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2008), pp. 3285–3290. ACM Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jamshidi, M. (ed.): System of Systems Engineering: Innovations for the Twenty-First Century. Wiley, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Curry, E.: System of systems information interoperability using a linked dataspace. In: 7th International Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SoSE), pp. 101–106. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Baldwin, W., Sauser, B.: Modeling the characteristics of system of systems. In: IEEE International Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SoSE 2009), pp. 1–6. IEEE, Piscataway (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stary, C., Wachholder, D.: System-of-systems support – a bigraph approach to interoperability and emergent behavior. Data Knowl. Eng. 105, 155–172 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2015.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kolb, J., Hübner, P., Reichert, M.: Automatically generating and updating user interface components in process-aware information systems. In: Meersman, R., et al. (eds.) OTM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7565, pp. 444–454. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33606-5_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Franke, J., Charoy, F., El Khoury, P.: Framework for coordination of activities in dynamic situations. Enterpr. Inf. Syst. 7(1), 33–60 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2012.690891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Panetto, H., Cecil, J.: Information systems for enterprise integration, interoperability and networking: theory and applications. Enterpr. Inf. Syst. 7(1), 1–6 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2012.684802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vernadat, F.B.: Technical, semantic and organizational issues of enterprise interoperability and networking. Annu. Rev. Control 34(1), 139–144 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2010.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Benaben, F., Mu, W., Boissel-Dallier, N., et al.: Supporting interoperability of collaborative networks through engineering of a service-based mediation information system (MISE 2.0). Enterp. Inf. Syst. 9(5–6), 556–582 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2014.928949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Louridas, P., Loucopoulos, P.: A generic model for reflective design. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 9(2), 199–237 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1145/350887.350895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., et al.: Reflective design. In: Bertelsen, O.W., Bouvin, N.O., Krogh, P.G., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing Between Sense and Sensibility (CC 2005), pp. 49–58. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bardzell, S., Bardzell, J., Forlizzi, J., et al.: Critical design and critical theory. In: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference on (DIS 2012), pp. 288–297. ACM Press, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S.: What is “critical” about critical design? In: Mackay, W.E., Brewster, S., Bødker, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2013), pp. 3297–3306. ACM Press, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Menendez-Blanco, M., Bjorn, P., de Angeli, A.: Fostering cooperative activism through critical design. In: Lee, C.P., Poltrock, S., Barkhuus, L., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW 2017), pp. 618–629. ACM Press, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hornidge, A.K.: Mid-range concepts–the lego bricks of meaning-making: an example from Khorezm, Uzbekistan. In: Mielke, K., Hornidge, A.K. (eds.) Area Studies at the Crossroads, pp. 213–230. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Resnick, M., Wilensky, U.: Diving into complexity: developing probabilistic decentralized thinking through role-playing activities. J. Learn. Sci. 7(2), 153–172 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0702_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Stary, C.: System-of-systems design thinking on behavior. Systems 5(1), 3 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems5010003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Fleischmann, A., Schmidt, W., Stary, C., et al.: Nondeterministic events in business processes. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P., et al. (eds.) Business Process Management Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 364–377. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36285-9_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria

    Christian Stary & Claudia Kaar

Authors
  1. Christian Stary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claudia Kaar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Stary .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Odisee University College, Brussels, Belgium

    Christophe Debruyne

  2. University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France

    Hervé Panetto

  3. University Linz, Linz, Austria

    Georg Weichhart

  4. Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Peter Bollen

  5. University Babes-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

    Ioana Ciuciu

  6. Universidad Simón Bolívar, Caracas, Venezuela

    Maria-Esther Vidal

  7. TU Graz, Graz, Austria

    Robert Meersman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stary, C., Kaar, C. (2018). A User-Centered Perspective on Interoperability: Capturing Stakeholder Interaction for Mediating Design. In: Debruyne, C., et al. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2017 Workshops. OTM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10697. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73805-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73805-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73804-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73805-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation