Skip to main content

Combining Trust and Aggregate Computing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 10729))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recent trends such as the Internet of Things and pervasive computing demand for novel engineering approaches able to support the specification and scalable runtime execution of adaptive behaviour of large collections of interacting devices. Aggregate computing is one such approach, formally founded in the field calculus, which enables programming of device aggregates by a global stance, through a functional composition of self-organisation patterns that is turned automatically into repetitive local computations and gossip-like interactions. However, the logically decentralised and open nature of such algorithms and systems presumes a fundamental cooperation of the devices involved: an error in a device or a focused attack may significantly compromise the computation outcome and hence the algorithms built on top of it. We propose trust as a framework to detect, ponder or isolate voluntary/involuntary misbehaviours, with the goal of mitigating the influence on the overall computation. To better understand the fragility of aggregate systems in face of attacks and investigate possible countermeasures, in this paper we consider the paradigmatic case of the gradient algorithm, analysing the impact of offences and the mitigation afforded by the adoption of trust mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 107.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://bitbucket.org/scafiteam/scafi.

  2. 2.

    The semantics of the field calculus has been implemented in a slightly different but largely equivalent way with respect to the “standard” one, due to design choices as well as technicalities involved in the DSL embedding.

  3. 3.

    Actually, fields do not explicitly appear in the method signatures: there are no “first-class” fields in ScaFi; rather, that notion (which still can be used while reasoning about code) has been replaced with that of neighbour-dependent expression.

  4. 4.

    Note that the actual communication between devices is matter of the platform and is usually performed through export broadcasting (and not during program execution).

  5. 5.

    The amount of time that neighbour exports are retained depends on the platform configuration for a particular application.

  6. 6.

    The experimental setup is available at the following repository: https://bitbucket.org/metaphori/trusted-ac-experiments.

References

  1. Aldini, A.: Modeling and verification of trust and reputation systems. J. Secur. Commun. Netw. 8(16), 2933–2946 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beal, J., Pianini, D., Viroli, M.: Aggregate programming for the internet of things. IEEE Comput. 48(9), 22–30 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchegger, S., Boudec, J.Y.L.: A robust reputation system for peer-to-peer and mobile ad-hoc networks. In: 2nd Workshop on the Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, P2PEcon (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Casadei, R., Pianini, D., Viroli, M.: Simulating large-scale aggregate mass with alchemist and scala. In: 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), pp. 1495–1504. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Casadei, R., Viroli, M.: Towards aggregate programming in scala. In: 1st Workshop on Programming Models and Languages for Distributed Computing, p. 5. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cho, J.H., Swami, A., Chen, I.R.: A survey on trust management for mobile ad hoc networks. Commun. Surv. Tutor. 13(4), 562–583 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Damiani, F., Viroli, M., Beal, J.: A type-sound calculus of computational fields. Sci. Comput. Program. 117, 17–44 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ganeriwal, S., Balzano, L.K., Srivastava, M.B.: Reputation-based framework for high integrity sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. 4(3), 1–37 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Han, G., Jiang, J., Shu, L., Niu, J., Chao, H.C.: Management and applications of trust in wireless sensor networks: a survey. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 80(3), 602–617 (2014). Special Issue on Wireless Network Intrusion

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, J.: A formal-semantics-based calculus of trust. Internet Comput. 14(5), 38–46 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jøsang, A.: A logic for uncertain probabilities. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst. 9(3), 279–311 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Jøsang, A., Ismail, R.: The beta reputation system. In: 15th Bled Conference on Electronic Commerce (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li, J., Li, R., Kato, J.: Future trust management framework for mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 46(4), 108–114 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, Z., Shen, H.: Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation incentives strategies in mobile ad hoc networks. Trans. Mob. Comput. 11(8), 1287–1303 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marmol, F.G., Perez, G.M.: Security threats scenarios in trust and reputation models for distributed systems. Comput. Secur. 28(7), 545–556 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mousa, H., Mokhtar, S.B., Hasan, O., Younes, O., Hadhoud, M., Brunie, L.: Trust management and reputation systems in mobile participatory sensing applications: a survey. Comput. Netw. 90, 49–73 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Perrig, A., Szewczyk, R., Tygar, J., Wen, V., Culler, D.: SPINS: security protocols for sensor networks. Wirel. Netw. 8(5), 521–534 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Pianini, D., Montagna, S., Viroli, M.: Chemical-oriented simulation of computational systems with ALCHEMIST. J. Simul. 7(3), 202–215 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Priayoheswari, B., Kulothungan, K., Kannan, A.: Beta reputation and direct trust model for secure communication in wireless sensor networks. In: International Conference on Informatics and Analytics, ICIA 2016, pp. 1–5. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Trcek, D.: A formal apparatus for modeling trust in computing environments. Math. Comput. Model. 49(1–2), 226–233 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Viroli, M., Beal, J., Damiani, F., Pianini, D.: Efficient engineering of complex self-organising systems by self-stabilising fields. In: IEEE 9th International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO), pp. 81–90. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Viroli, M., Casadei, R., Pianini, D.: On execution platforms for large-scale aggregate computing. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct, pp. 1321–1326. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Viroli, M., Damiani, F., Beal, J.: A calculus of computational fields. In: Canal, C., Villari, M. (eds.) ESOCC 2013. CCIS, vol. 393, pp. 114–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45364-9_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu, Y., Li, K., Zhoub, W., Lib, P.: Trust mechanisms in wireless sensor networks: attack analysis and countermeasures. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 35(3), 867–880 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Casadei .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Casadei, R., Aldini, A., Viroli, M. (2018). Combining Trust and Aggregate Computing. In: Cerone, A., Roveri, M. (eds) Software Engineering and Formal Methods. SEFM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10729. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74781-1_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74781-1_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74780-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74781-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics