Skip to main content

Using Gamification for Supporting an Introductory Programming Course. The Case of ClassCraft in a Secondary Education Classroom

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation (ArtsIT 2017, DLI 2017)

Abstract

Old teaching methods mechanisms are no longer beneficial to the students. In traditional instructional methodology, where the lecture classes are perceived to be tedious by students, the gamification technology has a great advantage to solve the problem as it can improve learning motivation of students. Various studies have shown that gamification under appropriate conditions may create an environment conducive to learning and lead to large increases in students’ interest in programming. ClassCraft is a game that it can be used in the classroom to help students to have fun, promote teamwork, and become better learners. In this paper, we present a pilot teaching intervention. The results showed that the general students’ performance has not been affected positively. On the other hand, their engagement has been affected positively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Al-Azawi, R., Al-Faliti, F., Al-Blushi, M.: Educational gamification vs. game based learning: comparative study. Int. J. Innov. Manag. Technol. 7(4), 131 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bennedsen, J., Caspersen, M.E.: Failure rates in introductory programming. ACM SIGCSE Bull. Inroads 39(2), 32–36 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berdousis, I., Kordaki, M.: Gender differences and achievement in computer science: a case study. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 191, 1161–1166 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bond, L.: Mathimagicians quest: applying game design concepts to education to increase school engagement for students with emotional and behavioral disabilities. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Calvo, A., Rotaru, D.C., Freire, M., Fernandez-Manjon, B.: Tools and approaches for simplifying serious games development in educational settings. In: Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 1188–1197. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chan, K.Y.G., Tan, S.L., Hew, K.F.T., Koh, B.G., Lim, L.S., Yong, J.C.: Knowledge for games, games for knowledge: designing a digital roll-and-move board game for a law of torts class. Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanced Learn. 12(1), 7 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan, V., Stafford, K., Klawe, M., Chen, G.: Gender differences in Vancouver secondary students interests related to information technology careers. In: Balka, E., Smith, R. (eds.) Women, Work and Computerization. ITIFIP, vol. 44, pp. 58–69. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35509-2_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. ClassCraft Studios Inc. http://www.ClassCraft.com/overview/

  9. Dewey, R.A.: Psychology: an introduction. http://www.intropsych.com/ch01_psychology_and_science/independent_dependent_and_subject_variables.html

  10. Gee, J.P.: Learning by design: games as learning machines. Digit. Educ. Rev. 8, 15–23 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gee, J.P.: What Video Games Have to Teach us About Learning and Literacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haris, D.A., Sugito, E.: Analysis of factors affecting user acceptance of the implementation of ClassCraft e-learning: case studies Faculty of Information Technology of Tarumanagara University. In: 2015 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), pp. 73–78. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hsu, C.-Y., Tsai, M.-J., Chang, Y.-H., Liang, J.-C.: Surveying in-service teachers’ beliefs about game-based learning and perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge of games. Educ. Technol. Soc. 20(1), 134–143 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S.: A proposal for teaching ScratchJr programming environment in preservice kindergarten teachers. In: Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA), «Research, Practice and Collaboration in Science Education». Dublin City University and the University of Limerick, Dublin, Ireland, 21–25 August 2017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S.: Pre-service kindergarten teachers acceptance of “ScratchJr” as a tool for learning and teaching computational thinking and Science education. In: Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA), «Research, Practice and Collaboration in Science Education». Dublin City University and the University of Limerick, Dublin, Ireland, 21–25 August 2017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kleinschmager, S., Hanenberg, S.: How to rate programming skills in programming experiments? A preliminary, exploratory, study based on university marks, pretests, and self-estimation. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Evaluation and Usability of Programming Languages and Tools, pp. 15–24. ACM Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Loyd, B.H., Gressard, C.: Reliability and factorial validity of computer attitude scale. Educ. Psychol. Measur. 44(2), 501–505 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moreno, J., Méndez, N.D.: Teaching sciences in K-12 using 2D educational massive online games. Anais temporários do LACLO 10(1), 394 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Orfanakis, V., Papadakis, S.: A new programming environment for teaching programming. A first acquaintance with enchanting. In: The 2nd International Virtual Scientific Conference - Scieconf 2014, pp. 268–273. EDIS - University of Zilina, Slovakia (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Orfanakis, V., Papadakis, S.: Teaching basic programming concepts to novice programmers in secondary education using Twitter, Python, Ardruino and a coffee machine. In: Hellenic Conference on Innovating STEM Education (HISTEM), Greece (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Papadakis, S.: The use of computer games in classroom environment. Int. J. Teach. Case Stud. 9(1), 1–25 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Papadakis, S., Orfanakis, V.: Comparing novice programing environments for use in secondary education: App Inventor for Android vs. Alice. Int. J. Technol. Enhanced Learn. 10(1/2), 44–72 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., Orfanakis, V., Zaranis, N.: The appropriateness of Scratch and App Inventor as educational environments for teaching introductory programming in primary and secondary education. Int. J. Web Based Learn. Teach. Technologies (IJWLTT) 12(4), 58–77 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., Orfanakis, V., Zaranis, N.: Using Scratch and App Inventor for teaching introductory programming in secondary education. A case study. Int. J. Technol. Enhanced Learn. 8(3/4), 217–233 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Papadakis, S., Orfanakis, V.: The combined use of Lego Mindstorms NXT and App Inventor for teaching novice programmers. In: Alimisis, D., Moro, M., Menegatti, E. (eds.) Edurobotics 2016 2016. AISC, vol. 560, pp. 193–204. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55553-9_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Papadakis, S.: Creativity and innovation in European education. 10 years eTwinning. Past, present and the future. Int. J. Technol. Enhanced Learn. 8(3/4), 279–296 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., Orfanakis, V., Zaranis, N.: Novice programming environments. Scratch & App Inventor: a first comparison. In: Fardoun, H.M., Gallud, J.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2014 Workshop on Interaction Design in Educational Environments, pp. 1–7. ACM, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sanchez, E., Young, S., Jouneau-Sion, C.: ClassCraft: from gamification to ludicization of classroom management. Educ. Inf. Technol. 22(2), 497–513 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sant, C.: Leveling Up: Evaluating Theoretical Underpinnings and Applications of Gamification in the Classroom. Vanderbilt University, Peabody College of Education and Human Development (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, J.: Is the US education system ready for CS for all? Commun. ACM 60(8), 26–28 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Watson, C., Li, F.W.: Failure rates in introductory programming revisited. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 2014), pp. 39–44. ACM, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yardi, S., Bruckman, A.: What is computing?: Bridging the gap between teenagers’ perceptions and graduate students’ experiences. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Computing Education Research, pp. 39–50. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stamatios Papadakis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M. (2018). Using Gamification for Supporting an Introductory Programming Course. The Case of ClassCraft in a Secondary Education Classroom. In: Brooks, A., Brooks, E., Vidakis, N. (eds) Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation. ArtsIT DLI 2017 2017. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 229. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76908-0_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76908-0_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76907-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76908-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics