Skip to main content

Measuring Knowledge Management Project Performance

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 745))

Abstract

Knowledge management (KM) is recognized as contributing significantly to the organizational performance. Researchers have worked hard on KM performance measurement on the enterprise level. They investigate KM performance determinants and provide numerous KM performance models. Meanwhile, little research has been undertaken to assess knowledge management projects performance. In fact, the growing number of KM project confirms the need for a performance measurement model, able to assess, each time a KM project is introduced, the performance of such project in order to rationalize its use, evaluate its effectiveness and justify its consequent financial costs.

This research aims to fill the gap by proposing a generic model that carries out the performance measurement of KM projects. KM activities, KM success factors and KM outcomes are the main constructs of this model. For the operationalization of the model constructs, a literature review was conducted for KM outcomes and KM factors. Whereas a particular emphasis was placed on the KM activity construct and a KM flow model were designed to this end. The measurement properties of the model research constructs are investigated using the confirmatory factor analysis.

This study formulates the foundations for the understanding of KM projects performance constructs. It is believed to be used as a stepping stone for a further in depth theoretical and empirical studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Oufkir, L., Fredj, M., Kassou, I.: Knowledge management performance measurement: a generic framework. In: 12th International Baltic Conference on Databases and Information Systems, DB&IS (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davenport, T.H., De Long, D.W., Beers, M.C.: Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Manag. Rev. 39, 43–57 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wong, K.Y., Tan, L.P., Lee, C.S., Wong, W.P.: Knowledge Management performance measurement: measures, approaches, trends and future directions. Inf. Dev. 31, 239–257 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Del-Rey-Chamorro, F.M., Roy, R., Wegen, B.Van, Steele, A.: A framework to create key performance indicators for knowledge management solutions. J. Knowl. Manag. 7, 46–62 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang Lee, K., Lee, S., Kang, I.W.: KMPI: measuring knowledge management performance. Inf. Manag. 42, 469–482 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuah, C.T., Wong, K.Y., Wong, W.P.: Monte Carlo data envelopment analysis with genetic algorithm for knowledge management performance measurement. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 9348–9358 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, L., Fong, P.S.W.: Evaluation of knowledge management performance: an organic approach. Inf. Manag. 52, 431–453 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wong, K.Y.: Critical success factors for implementing knowledge management in small and medium enterprises. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 105, 261–279 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mas-Machuca, M., Martínez Costa, C.: Exploring critical success factors of knowledge management projects in the consulting sector. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 23, 1297–1313 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, Y.M., Wang, Y.C.: Determinants of firms’ knowledge management system implementation: an empirical study (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Oufkir, L., Fredj, M., Kassou, I.: Towards a reference model for knowledge management performance measurement. In: International Business Information Management-Association (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ackoff, R.L.: From data to wisdom. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 16, 3–9 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Polanyi, M.: The tacit dimension. In: Knowledge in Organanisation, pp. 135–146 (1966)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., Konno, N.: SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Plann. 33, 5–34 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alavi, M., Leidner, D.E.: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Q. 25, 107–136 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grundstein, M.: Assessing enterprise’ s knowledge management maturity level. Int. J. Knowl. Learn. 4, 380–387 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zaied, A.N.H.: An integrated knowledge management capabilities framework for assessing organizational performance. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci. 4, 1–10 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wiig, K.M.: Comprehensive knowledge management (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, C.S., Wong, K.Y.: Development and validation of knowledge management performance measurement constructs for small and medium enterprises. J. Knowl. Manag. 19, 711–734 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wipawayangkool, K., Teng, J.T.C.: Paths to tacit knowledge sharing: knowledge internalization and individual-task-technology fit. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 14, 309–318 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen, M.-Y., Huang, M.-J., Cheng, Y.-C.: Measuring knowledge management performance using a competitive perspective: an empirical study. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 8449–8459 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chong, C.W., Chong, S.C., Wong, K.Y.: Implementation of KM strategies in the Malaysian telecommunication industry: an empirical analysis. Vine. 37, 452–470 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Choy, C.S., Yew, W.K., Lin, B.: Criteria for measuring KM performance outcomes in organisations. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 106, 917–936 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Massingham, P.R., Massingham, R.K.: Does knowledge management produce practical outcomes? J. Knowl. Manag. 18, 221–254 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yahyapour, S., Shamizanjani, M., Mosakhani, M.: A conceptual breakdown structure for knowledge management benefits using meta-synthesis method (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mortensen, P.S., Carter, W.B.: Oslo Manual. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd edn. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vasconcelos, J.B., Kimble, C., Carreteiro, P., Rocha, Á.: The application of knowledge management to software evolution. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 37, 1499–1506 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Latifa Oufkir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Cite this paper

Oufkir, L., Kassou, I. (2018). Measuring Knowledge Management Project Performance. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L.P., Costanzo, S. (eds) Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST'18 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 745. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77703-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77703-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77702-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77703-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics