Skip to main content

Evaluation of High-Speed Image Processing for Low Latency Control of a Mechatronic System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications 5 (RiTA 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 751))

  • 888 Accesses

Abstract

The use of artificial vision in control loops as a feedback element or a reference signal for the control of automation systems requires low latency. Several artificial vision system realizations are compared in terms of latency of novel event detection. The target application is a semi-automated foosball table. Novel event detection latency ranged from 26.4 to 260.7 ms. The system with the lowest latency has a camera connected directly to an FPGA SoC (System on Chip), where streamed vision preprocessing is performed in hardware. Finally, an SoC based control platform with low overall latency is briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Franklin, G.F., Powell, J.D., Emami-Naeini, A.: Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems, 7th edn. Pearson, New Jersey (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Engelberg, S.: A Mathematical Introduction to Control Theory, 2nd edn., vol. IV. Imperial College Press, London (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Janssen, R., Verrijt, M., de Best, J., van de Molengraft, R.: Ball localization and tracking in a highly dynamic table soccer environment. Mechatronics 22, 503–514 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cizek, P., Faigl, J., Masri, D.: Low-latency image processing for vision-based navigation systems. In: International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Stockholm, pp. 781–786 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barry, A.J., Oleynikova, H., Honegger, D., Pollefeys, M., Tedrake, R.: Fast onboard stereo vision for UAVs. In: Vision-Based Control and Navigation of Small Lightweight UAVs, IROS Workshop (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson, R.L.: A low-latency 60 Hz stereo vision system for real-time visual control. In: International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Philadelphia, pp. 165–170 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. de la Malla, C., Lopez-Moliner, J.: Predictive plus online visual information optimizes temporal precision in interception. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percep. Perf. 41(5), 1271–1280 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cigliano, P., Lippiello, V., Ruggiero, F., Siciliano, B.: Robotic ball catching with an eye-in-hand single camera system. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 23(5), 1657–1671 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berner, R., Brandli, C., Yang, M., Liu, S.-C., Delbruck, T.: A 240 × 180 10 mW 12 μs latency sparse-output vision sensor for mobile applications. In: Symposium on VLSI Circuits, Kyoto, pp. C186–C187 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Conradt, J., Berner, R., Cook, M., Delbruck, T.: An embedded AER dynamic vision sensor for low-latency pole balancing. In: International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, Kyoto, pp. 780–785 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mueller, E., Censi, A., Frazzoli, E.: Low-latency heading feedback control with neuromorphic vision sensors using efficient approximated incremental inference. In: Annual Conference on Decision and Control, Osaka, pp. 992–999 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Censi, A., Strubel, J., Brandli, C., Delbruck, T., Scaramuzza, D.: Low-latency localization by active LED markers tracking using a dynamic vision sensor. In: International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tokyo, pp. 891–898 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Honegger, D., Oleynikova, H., Pollefeys, M.: Real-time and low latency embedded computer vision hardware based on a combination of FPGA and mobile CPU. In: International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Chicago, pp. 4930–4935 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wolpert, D.W., Flanagan, J.R.: Motor prediction. Curr. Biol. 11(18), pp. R729–R732 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua Lues .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lues, J., Gupta, G.S., Bailey, D. (2019). Evaluation of High-Speed Image Processing for Low Latency Control of a Mechatronic System. In: Kim, JH., et al. Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications 5. RiTA 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 751. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78452-6_46

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics