Abstract
Advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) are in-car technologies that record and process vehicle and road information to take actions to reduce the risk of collision. These technologies however do not use information obtained directly from the driver such as the brain activity. This work proposes the recognition of brake intention using driver’s electroencephalographic (EEG) signals recorded in real driving situations. Five volunteers participated in an experiment that consisted on driving a car and braking in response to a visual stimulus. Driver’s EEG signals were collected and employed to assess two classification scenarios, pre-stimulus vs pos-stimulus and no-braking vs brake-intention. Classification results showed across-all-participants accuracies of 85.2 ± 5.7% and 79 ± 9.1%, respectively, which are above the chance level. Further analysis on the second scenario showed that true positive rate (77.1%) and true negative rate (79.3%) were very similar, which indicates no bias in the classification between no-braking vs brake-intention. These results show that driver’s EEG signals can be used to detect brake intention, which could be useful to take actions to avoid potential collisions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
WHO: Global status report on road safety 2015. World Health Organization (2015)
Louwerse, W.J.R., Hoogendoorn, S.P.: ADAS safety impacts on rural and urban highways, pp. 887–890, June 2004
Khan, J.: Using ADAS sensors in implementation of novel automotive features for increased safety and guidance, pp. 753–758, February 2016
Okuda, R., Kajiwara, Y., Terashima, K.: A survey of technical trend of ADAS and autonomous driving, pp. 1–4, April 2014
Stanton, N.A., Marsden, P.: From fly-by-wire to drive-by-wire: safety implications of automation in vehicles. Saf. Sci. 24, 35–49 (1996)
Young, M.S., Stanton, N.A., Harris, D.: Driving automation: learning from aviation about design philosophies. Int. J. Veh. Des. 45, 323–338 (2007)
Haufe, S., Treder, M., Gugler, M.F., Sagebaum, M., Curio, G., Blankertz, B.: EEG potentials predict upcoming emergency brakings during simulated driving. J. Neural Eng. 8, 056001 (2011)
Kim, I.H., Kim, J.W., Haufe, S., Lee, S.W.: Detection of braking intention in diverse situations during simulated driving based on EEG feature combination. J. Neural Eng. 12, 016001 (2015)
Khaliliardali, Z., Chavarriaga, R., Gheorghe, L.A., del Millan, J.R.: Detection of anticipatory brain potentials during car driving. In: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 3829–3832 (2012)
Haufe, S., Kim, J.W., Kim, I.H., Sonnleitner, A., Schrauf, M., Curio, G., Blankert, B.: Electrophysiology-based detection of emergency braking intention in real-world driving. J. Neural Eng. 11, 056011 (2014)
Khaliliardali, Z., Chavarriaga Lozano, R., Zhang, H., Gheorghe, L.A., Millán, J.R.: Single trial classification of neural correlates of anticipatory behavior during real car driving (2016)
WHO: World medical association declaration of Helsinki. Bull. World Health Organ. 79, 373–374 (2001)
ISO 15765-3:2004: Road vehicles - diagnostics on Controller Area Networks (CAN) - Part 4: Requirements for emissions-related systems. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, January 2005
Elm Electronics Inc.: ELM327 OBD to RS232 Intepreter (2014)
g.Tech: g.Nautilus wireless biosignal acquisition. http://www.gtec.at/Products/Hardware-and-Accessories/g.Nautilus-Specs-Features. Accessed 30 Sept 16
Venkataramanan, S., Prabhat, P., Choudhury, S.R., Nemade, H.B., Sahambi, J.S.: Biomedical instrumentation based on electrooculogram (EOG) signal processing and application to a hospital alarm system. In: Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Intelligent Sensing and Information Processing, pp. 535–540, January 2005
OBD Solutions : Multiprotocol OBD to UART Interpreter. STN1110 datasheet, November 2012
Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., Schoffelen, J.M.: FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 1:1–1:9 (2011)
Acknowledgments
This research has been funded by the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACyT) through grants 268958 and PN2015-873. We gratefully acknowledge the support of NVIDIA Corporation with the donation of the Titan X Pascal GPU used for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Martínez, E., Hernández, L.G., Antelis, J.M. (2018). Discrimination Between Normal Driving and Braking Intention from Driver’s Brain Signals. In: Rojas, I., Ortuño, F. (eds) Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering. IWBBIO 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10813. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78723-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78723-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78722-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78723-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)