Skip to main content

Extended Formulations for Column Constrained Orbitopes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Operations Research Proceedings 2017

Abstract

In the literature, packing and partitioning orbitopes were discussed to handle symmetries that act on variable matrices in certain binary programs. In this paper, we extend this concept by restrictions on the number of 1-entries in each column. We develop extended formulations of the resulting polytopes and present numerical results that show their effect on the LP relaxation of a graph partitioning problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Balas, E. (1998). Disjunctive programming: Properties of the convex hull of feasible points. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 89(1), 3–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Davis, T. A., & Hu, Y. (2011). The University of Florida sparse matrix collection. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 38(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Faenza, Y., & Kaibel, V. (2009). Extended formulations for packing and partitioning orbitopes. Mathematics of Operations Research, 34(3), 686–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gamrath, G., Fischer, T., Gally, T., Gleixner, A. M., Hendel, G., Koch, T., Maher, S.J., Miltenberger, M., Müller, B., Pfetsch, M. E., Puchert, C., Rehfeldt, D., Schenker, S., Schwarz, R., Serrano, F., Shinano, Y., Vigerske, S., Weninger, D., Winkler, M., Witt, J. T., Witzig, J. (2016). The SCIP Optimization Suite 3.2. Technical Report 15-60, ZIB, Takustr. 7, 14195 Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gawrilow, E., & Joswig, M. (2000). Polymake: A framework for analyzing convex polytopes. In Polytopes – combinatorics and computation (pp. 43–74).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Hojny, C., & Pfetsch, M. E. (2017). Polytopes associated with symmetry handling. www.optimization-online.org/DB_HTML/2017/01/5835.html.

  7. Kaibel, V., & Loos, A. (2011). Finding descriptions of polytopes via extended formulations and liftings. In: A. R. Mahjoub (Ed.), Progress in combinatorial optimization. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kaibel, V., & Pfetsch, M. E. (2008). Packing and partitioning orbitopes. Mathematical Programming, 114(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Karisch, S. E., & Rendl, F. (1998). Semidefinite programming and graph equipartition. Topics in Semidefinite and Interior-Point Methods, 18, 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karypis, G., & Kumar, V. (1998). A fast and high quality multilevel scheme for partitioning irregular graphs. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 20(1), 359–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lisser, A., & Rendl, F. (2003). Graph partitioning using linear and semidefinite programming. Mathematical Programming, 95(1), 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Loos, A. (2011). Describing orbitopes by linear inequalities and projection based tools. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Magdeburg.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research of the second and third author was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) as part of the Collaborative Research Centre 666 and 805, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Schmitt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hojny, C., Pfetsch, M.E., Schmitt, A. (2018). Extended Formulations for Column Constrained Orbitopes. In: Kliewer, N., Ehmke, J., Borndörfer, R. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2017. Operations Research Proceedings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89920-6_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics