Skip to main content

Exploiting User Expertise and Willingness of Participation in Building Reputation Model for Scholarly Community-Based Question and Answering (CQA) Platforms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 976 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 764))

Abstract

Several scholarly social networking platforms are available on the Web, which build a collaborative research & development (R&D) environment for academicians and researchers to connect and collaborate with each other in solving real-world problems. The collaboration happens in the form of uploading, sharing and following research outcomes including technical reports, research publications, books, etc.; giving feedback on these research outputs; and community-based question & answering (CQA). In such systems, the reputation of users plays a key role, which acts as a trust indicator for the quality of questions, answers, and in recommending scholars and scholarly data. It is therefore necessary to build the reputation of a scholar in manner that reflects their active participation in the CQA activities. Therefore, the paper contributes a reputation model that besides expertise, considers the willingness of the user to participate in the CQA activities. The proposed reputation model is the first step towards recommending experts and active scholars that can potentially answer a given question. The empirical results show that the user expertise and their willingness to participate in the scholarly social Q&A activities play a major role in building more accurate reputation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.stackoverflow.com.

  2. 2.

    http://www.anwers.yahoo.com.

  3. 3.

    http://www.naver.com.

  4. 4.

    https://www.researchgate.net.

References

  1. Huo, Q., Palmer, A.: Analysing voluntary contribution to online forums using a proposed critical mass contribution model. J. Appl. Bus. Res. 31(2), 687 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdaoui, A., Azé, J., Bringay, S., Poncelet, P.: Collaborative content-based method for estimating user reputation in online forums. In: Wang, J., Cellary, W., Wang, D., Wang, H., Chen, S.-C., Li, T., Zhang, Y. (eds.) WISE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9419, pp. 292–299. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26187-4_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Alam, A., et al.: Confluence of social network, social question and answering community, and user reputation model for information seeking and experts generation. J. Inf. Sci. 43(2), 260–274 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551516637322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mui, L., Mohtashemi, M., Halberstadt, A.: Notions of reputation in multi-agents systems: a review. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Part 1. ACM (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abdel-Hafez, A., Xu, Y., Tian, N.: Item reputation-aware recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. McNally, K., et al.: Towards a reputation-based model of social web search. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fu, M., Zhu, M., Su, Y., Zhu, Q., Li, M.: Modeling temporal behavior to identify potential experts in question answering communities. In: Luo, Y. (ed.) CDVE 2016. LNCS, vol. 9929, pp. 51–58. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46771-9_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Jurczyk, P., Agichtein, E.: Discovering authorities in question answer communities by using link analysis. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bian, J., et al.: Learning to recognize reliable users and content in social media with coupled mutual reinforcement. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li, L., et al.: Answer quality characteristics and prediction on an academic Q&A site: a case study on ResearchGate. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kraker, P., Lex, E.: A critical look at the ResearchGate score as a measure of scientific reputation. In: Proceedings of the Quantifying and Analysing Scholarly Communication on the Web workshop (ASCW 2015), Web Science Conference (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson, A., et al.: Discovering value from community activity on focused question answering sites: a case study of stack overflow. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. MacLeod, L.: Reputation on stack exchange: tag, you’re it! In: 2014 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA). IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wei, X., Chen, W., Zhu, K.: Motivating user contributions in online knowledge communities: virtual rewards and reputation. In: 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, W., et al.: A user reputation model for a user-interactive question answering system. Concurrency Comput. Pract. Experience 19(15), 2091–2103 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ovadia, S.: ResearchGate and Academia. edu: academic social networks. Behav. Soc. Sci. Librarian 33(3), 165–169 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu, M.-C., et al.: ResearchGate: an effective altmetric indicator for active researchers? Comput. Hum. Behav. 55, 1001–1006 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shah Khusro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rahman, T.U., Khusro, S., Ullah, I., Ali, Z. (2019). Exploiting User Expertise and Willingness of Participation in Building Reputation Model for Scholarly Community-Based Question and Answering (CQA) Platforms. In: Silhavy, R. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Algorithms in Intelligent Systems. CSOC2018 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 764. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91189-2_43

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics