Skip to main content

Carroll Diagrams: Design and Manipulation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (Diagrams 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10871))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The use of diagrams in logic is old. Euler and Venn schemes are among the most popular. Carroll diagrams are less known but are occasionally mentioned in recent literature. The objective of this tutorial is to expose the working of Carroll’s diagrams and their significance from a triple perspective: historical, mathematical and philosophical. The diagrams are exposed, worked out and compared to Euler-Venn diagrams. These schemes are used to solve the problem of elimination which was widely addressed by early mathematical logicians: finding the conclusion that is to be drawn from any number of propositions given as premises containing any number of terms. For this purpose, they designed symbolic, visual and sometimes mechanical devices. The significance of Venn and Carroll diagrams is better understood within this historical context. The development of mathematical logic notably created the need for more complex diagrams to represent n terms, rather than merely 3 terms (the number demanded by syllogisms). Several methods to construct diagrams for n terms, with different strategies, are discussed. Finally, the philosophical significance of Carroll diagrams is discussed in relation to the use of rules to transfer information from a diagram to another. This practice is connected to recent philosophical debates on the role of diagrams in mathematical practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abeles, F.F.: Lewis Carroll’s visual logic. Hist. Philos. Log. 28(1), 1–17 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartley III, W.W. (ed.): Lewis Carroll’s Symbolic Logic. C. N. Potter, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carroll, L.: The Game of Logic. Macmillan, London (1887)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coumet, E.: The game of logic: a game of universes. In: Guiliano, E. (ed.) Lewis Carroll Observed, pp. 181–195. C. N. Potter, New York (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edwards, A.W.F.: Cogwheels of the Mind: The Story of Venn Diagrams. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Euler, L.: Lettres à une princesse d’Allemagne, vol. 2. Imprimerie de l’Académie impériale des sciences, Saint Petersburg (1768)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Geach, P.: Reason and Argument. University of California Press, Berkeley (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis, C.I.: A Survey of Symbolic Logic. University of California press, Berkeley (1918)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Macula, A.J.: Lewis Carroll and the enumeration of minimal covers. Math. Mag. 68(4), 269–274 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Moktefi, A.: Lewis Carroll’s logic. In: Gabbay, D.M., Woods, J. (eds.) British Logic in the Nineteenth Century, pp. 457–505. North-Holland, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moktefi, A.: Beyond syllogisms: Carroll’s (marked) quadriliteral diagram. In: Moktefi, A., Shin, S.-J. (eds.) Visual Reasoning with Diagrams, pp. 55–71. Basel, Birkhäuser (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Moktefi, A.: On the social utility of symbolic logic: Lewis Carroll against ‘The Logicians’. Stud. Metodol. 35, 133–150 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moktefi, A.: Diagrams as scientific instruments. In: Benedek, A., Veszelszki, A. (eds.) Virtual Reality – Real Visuality, pp. 81–89. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moktefi, A., Bellucci, F., Pietarinen, A.-V.: Continuity, connectivity and regularity in spatial diagrams for N terms. In: Burton, J., Choudhury, L. (eds.) DLAC 2013: Diagrams, Logic and Cognition, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1132, pp. 31–35 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moktefi, A., Pietarinen, A.-V.: On the diagrammatic representation of existential statements with Venn diagrams. J. Logic Lang. Inf. 24(4), 361–374 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Moktefi, A., Shin, S.-J.: A history of logic diagrams. In: Gabbay, D.M., Pelletier, F.J., Woods, J. (eds.) Logic: A History of Its Central Concepts, pp. 611–682. North-Holland, Amsterdam (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Venn, J.: On the diagrammatic and mechanical representation of propositions and reasonings. Philos. Mag. 10, 1–18 (1880)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amirouche Moktefi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Moktefi, A. (2018). Carroll Diagrams: Design and Manipulation. In: Chapman, P., Stapleton, G., Moktefi, A., Perez-Kriz, S., Bellucci, F. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10871. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91376-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91376-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91375-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91376-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics