Skip to main content

Signal Feature Analysis for Dynamic Anomaly Detection of Components in Embedded Control Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 761))

Abstract

Embedded Control Systems (ECS) are getting increasingly complex for the realization of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) with advanced autonomy (e.g. autonomous driving of cars). This compromises system dependability, especially when components developed separately are integrated. Under the circumstance, dynamic anomaly detection and risk management often become a necessary means for compensating the insufficiencies of conventional verification and validation, and architectural solutions (e.g. hardware redundancy). The aim of this work is to support the design of embedded software services for dynamic anomaly detection of components in ECS, through probabilistic inference methods (e.g. Hidden Markov Model - HMM). In particular, the work provides a method for classifying the signal features of operational sensors and thereby applies Monte-Carlo sensitivity analysis for eliciting the probabilistic properties for error estimation. Such approach, based upon a physical model, reduces the dependency on empirical data for bringing about confidence on newly developed components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zhang, M., Selic, B., Ali, S., Yue, T., Okariz, O., Norgren, R.: Understanding uncertainty in cyber-physical systems: a conceptual model. In: European Conference on Modelling Foundations and Applications, pp. 247–264. Springer, Cham (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, D., Lu, Z.: A methodological framework for model-based self-management of services and components in dependable cyber-physical systems. In: Advances in Dependability Engineering of Complex Systems, pp. 97–105. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Design Optimization Toolbox of Matlab Simulink, Matlab, Mathworks. https://se.mathworks.com/products/sl-design-optimization.html. Accessed 17 Mar 2018

  4. Lanigan, P.E., Kavulya, S., Narasimhan, P., Fuhrman, T.E., Salman, M.A.: Diagnosis in automotive systems: a survey. Accessed 10 Sep 2011

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jennions, I.K. (ed.): Integrated Vehicle Health Management: Perspectives on an Emerging Field. SAE International, Warrendale (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kapur, K.C., Pecht, M.: Reliability Engineering. Wiley, Hoboken (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Ye, F., et al.: Board-level functional fault diagnosis using artificial neural networks, support-vector machines, and weighted-majority voting. IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 32(5), 723–736 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. der Kiureghian, A., Ditlevsen, O.: Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Struct. Saf. 31(2), 105–112 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aven, T., Baraldi, P., Flage, R., Zio, E.: Uncertainty in Risk Assessment: The Representation and Treatment of Uncertainties by Probabilistic and Non-probabilistic Methods. Wiley, West Sussex (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cannarile, F., Compare, M., Zio, E.: A fault diagnostic tool based on a first principle model simulator. In: International Symposium on Model-Based Safety and Assessment, pp. 179–193. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Meedeniya, I., Moser, I., Aleti, A., Grunske, L.: Evaluating probabilistic models with uncertain model parameters. Softw. Syst. Model. 13(4), 1395–1415 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ying, J., Kirubarajan, T., Pattipati, K.R., Patterson-hine, A.: A hidden Markov model-based algorithm for fault diagnosis with partial and imperfect tests. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 30(4), 463–473 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bangalore, P., Letzgus, S., Karlsson, D., Patriksson, M.: An artificial neural network-based condition monitoring method for wind turbines, with application to the monitoring of the gearbox. Wind Energy 20(8), 1421–1438 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, X., Gu, C., Lin, J.: Support vector machines for anomaly detection. In: The Sixth World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, WCICA 2006, pp. 2594–2598. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to DeJiu Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tao, X., Chen, D., Sagarduy, J. (2019). Signal Feature Analysis for Dynamic Anomaly Detection of Components in Embedded Control Systems. In: Zamojski, W., Mazurkiewicz, J., Sugier, J., Walkowiak, T., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Contemporary Complex Systems and Their Dependability. DepCoS-RELCOMEX 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 761. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91446-6_44

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics