Skip to main content

Abstract

Probabilistic classifiers output a probability of an input being a member of each of the possible classes, given some of its feature values, selecting most probable class as predicted class. We introduce and compare different measures of the feature strength in probabilistic confidence-weigthed classification models. For that, we follow two approaches: one based on conditional probability tables of the classification variable with respect to each feature, using different statistical distances and a correction parameter, and the second one based on accuracy in predicting classification from evidences on each isolated feature. On a case study, we compute these feature strength measures and rank features attending to them, comparing results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Delgado, R., González, J.L., Sotoca, A., Tibau, X.-A.: A Bayesian network profiler for wildfire arsonists. In: Pardalos, P.M., Conca, P., Giuffrida, G., Nicosia, G. (eds.) MOD 2016. LNCS, vol. 10122, pp. 379–390. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51469-7_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Friedman, J., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R.: The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer Series in Statistics, vol. 1, pp. 337–387. Springer, New York (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang, J., Ling, C.: Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algoritms. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 17, 299–310 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2005.50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson, D., Sinanovic, S.: Symmetrizing the Kullback-Leibler distance. Technical report, ECE Publications, Rice University (2001). https://www.ece.rice.edu/~dhj/resistor.pdf

  5. Lacave, C., Luque, M., Díez, F.J.: Explanation of Bayesian networks and influence diagrams in Elvira. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.-Part B: Cybern. 37(4), 952–965 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2007.896018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Markatou, M., Chen, Y., Afendras, G., Lindsay, B.G.: Statistical distances and their role in robustness. In: Chen, D.-G., Jin, Z., Li, G., Li, Y., Liu, A., Zhao, Y. (eds.) New Advances in Statistics and Data Science. IBSS, pp. 3–26. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69416-0_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are supported by Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Gobierno de España, project ref. MTM2015 67802-P, and belong to the “Quantitative Methods in Criminology” research group of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. They wish to express their acknowledgment to the Secretary of State for Security and the Prosecution Office of Environment and Urbanism of the Spanish state, for providing dataset used in the case study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosario Delgado .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Conditional Probability Tables of Features with Respect to Class Variable \(A_{15}\)

Appendix: Conditional Probability Tables of Features with Respect to Class Variable \(A_{15}\)

Table 6. CPT of \(A_{15}\) conditioned to \(C_1\) (in %).
Table 7. CPT of \(A_{15}\) conditioned to \(C_2\), and conditioned to \(C_3\) (in %).
Table 8. CPT of \(A_{15}\) conditioned to \(C_4\) (in %).
Table 9. CPT of \(A_{15}\) conditioned to \(C_5\) (in %).
Table 10. CPT of \(A_{15}\) conditioned to \(C_6\), to \(C_7\) and to \(C_8\) (in %).
Table 11. CPT of \(A_{15}\) conditioned to \(C_9\) and to \(C_{10}\) (in %).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Delgado, R., Tibau, XA. (2018). Measuring Features Strength in Probabilistic Classification. In: Medina, J., et al. Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. Theory and Foundations. IPMU 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 853. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91473-2_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91473-2_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91472-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91473-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics