Skip to main content

Stable Configurations with (Meta)Punishing Agents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Multi-Agent Based Simulation XVIII (MABS 2017)

Abstract

We consider an adaptation of Axelrod’s metanorm model, where a population of agents choose between cooperating and defecting in bilateral interactions. Because punishing incurs an enforcement cost, Axelrod proposes using metanorms, to facilitate the stability of a norm of punishing defectors, where those who do not punish defectors can themselves be punished. We present two approaches to study the social effects of such metanorms when agents can choose their interaction partners: (a) a theoretical study, when agent behaviors are static, showing stable social configurations, under all possible relationships between system parameters representing agent payoffs with or without defection, punishment, and meta-punishment, and (b) an experimental evaluation of emergent social configurations when agents choose behaviors to maximize expected utility. We highlight emergent social configurations, including anarchy, a “police” state with cooperating agents who enforce, and a unique “corrupt police” state where one enforcer penalizes all defectors but defects on others!

This paper has already been published in: \(\copyright \) Springer International Publishing AG 2017 G. Sukthankar and J. A. Rodriguez-Aguilar (Eds.): AAMAS 2017 Visionary Papers, LNCS 10643, pp. 31–44, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71679-4_2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Airiau, S., Sen, S., Villatoro, D.: Emergence of conventions through social learning. Auton. Agents Multi-agent Syst. 28(5), 779–804 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Axelrod, R.: An evolutionary approach to norms. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 80, 1095–1111 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baetz, O.: Social activity and network formation. Theor. Econ. 10(2), 315–340 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Barabasi, A.: Network Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Belardinelli, F., Grossi, D.: On the formal verification of diffusion phenomena in open dynamic agent networks. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2015, pp. 237–245. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berninghaus, S., Vogt, B.: Network formation and coordination games, March 2003

    Google Scholar 

  7. Borge-Holthoefer, J., Baos, R.A., Gonzlez-Bailn, S., Moreno, Y.: Cascading behaviour in complex socio-technical networks. J. Complex Netw. 1(1), 3–24 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brooks, L., Iba, W., Sen, S.: Modeling the emergence and convergence of norms. In: IJCAI, pp. 97–102 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., Gummadi, K.P.: Measuring user influence in Twitter: the million follower fallacy. In: Proceedings of International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social in ICWSM 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. David, E., Jon, K.: Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World. Cambridge University Press, New York (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Delgado, J.: Emergence of social conventions in complex networks. Artif. Intell. 141(1–2), 171–185 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Epstein, J.M.: Learning to be thoughtless: social norms and individual computation. Comput. Econ. 18(1), 9–24 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Galán, J.M., Łatek, M.M., Rizi, S.M.M.: Axelrod’s metanorm games on networks. PLOS ONE 6(5), 1–11 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mahmoud, S., Miles, S., Luck, M.: Cooperation emergence under resource-constrained peer punishment. In: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & #38; Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2016, pp. 900–908. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peleteiro, A., Burguillo, J.C., Chong, S.Y.: Exploring indirect reciprocity in complex networks using coalitions and rewiring. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, AAMAS 2014, pp. 669–676. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ranjbar-Sahraei, B., Bou Ammar, H., Bloembergen, D., Tuyls, K., Weiss, G.: Evolution of cooperation in arbitrary complex networks. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, AAMAS 2014, pp. 677–684. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Savarimuthu, B.T.R., Cranefield, S., Purvis, M., Purvis, M.: Norm emergence in agent societies formed by dynamically changing networks. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, IAT 2007, pp. 464–470. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sina, S., Hazon, N., Hassidim, A., Kraus, S.: Adapting the social network to affect elections. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2015, pp. 705–713. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tsang, A., Larson, K.: Opinion dynamics of skeptical agents. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, AAMAS 2014, pp. 277–284. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Villatoro, D., Andrighetto, G., Sabater-Mir, J., Conte, R.: Dynamic sanctioning for robust and cost-efficient norm compliance. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume One, IJCAI 2011, pp. 414–419. AAAI Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Villatoro, D., Sen, S., Sabater-Mir, J.: Topology and memory effect on convention emergence. In: IAT (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the University of Tulsa and in particular the Tulsa Undergraduate Research Challenge (TURC) for financial support of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathaniel Beckemeyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Beckemeyer, N., Macke, W., Sen, S. (2018). Stable Configurations with (Meta)Punishing Agents. In: Dimuro, G., Antunes, L. (eds) Multi-Agent Based Simulation XVIII. MABS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10798. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91587-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91587-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91586-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91587-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics