Abstract
Flexible process management systems store information about conducted process change operations in change logs. Change log analysis can provide users who are responsible for planning and executing upcoming adaptations with valuable information. Change trees represent change logs emphasizing the temporal relation between change operations such that users can immediately see which change sequences have been applied in the past. Similar to most process mining approaches, change trees currently build upon label equivalence. However, labels only provide restricted information about a change operation. Hence this paper investigates how process change similarity can be employed to compare changes, i.e., similar change operations are aggregated in the tree as they appear in a change sequence. A user experiment shows the increased efficiency of the aggregated change sequences: users find relevant information faster than in a change tree based on label equivalence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The full version of the algorithm can be found on our project homepage https://cs.univie.ac.at/project/APES.
- 2.
The prototype, the experiment including all questions, and all related data can be found at https://cs.univie.ac.at/project/APES.
References
Reichert, M., Weber, B.: Enabling Flexibility in Process-Aware Information Systems - Challenges, Methods, Technologies. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30409-5
Günther, C., Rinderle-Ma, S., Reichert, M., van der Aalst, W.: Using process mining to learn from process changes in evolutionary systems. Int. J. Bus. Process Integr. Manage. 3, 61–78 (2008)
Kaes, G., Rinderle-Ma, S.: Mining and querying process change information based on change trees. In: Barros, A., Grigori, D., Narendra, N.C., Dam, H.K. (eds.) ICSOC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9435, pp. 269–284. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48616-0_17
Kaes, G., Rinderle-Ma, S.: On the similarity of process change operations. In: Dubois, E., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10253, pp. 348–363. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59536-8_22
Allen, F.E.: Control flow analysis. ACM Sigplan Not. 5, 1–19 (1970)
Ingvaldsen, J.E., Gulla, J.A.: Industrial application of semantic process mining. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 6, 139–163 (2012)
Rinderle-Ma, S., Reichert, M., Jurisch, M.: On utilizing web service equivalence for supporting the composition life cycle. Int. J. Web Serv. Res. 8, 41–67 (2011)
Bron, C., Kerbosch, J.: Algorithm 457: finding all cliques of an undirected graph. Commun. ACM 16, 575–577 (1973)
Becker, M., Laue, R.: A comparative survey of business process similarity measures. Comput. Ind. 63, 148–167 (2012)
Van Dongen, B., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J.: Measuring similarity between business process models. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 450–464. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69534-9_34
Pflug, J., Rinderle-Ma, S.: Process instance similarity: potentials, metrics, applications. In: Debruyne, C., et al. (eds.) OTM 2016. LNCS, vol. 10033, pp. 136–154. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48472-3_8
Bose, R.P.J.C., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Žliobaitė, I., Pechenizkiy, M.: Handling concept drift in process mining. In: Mouratidis, H., Rolland, C. (eds.) CAiSE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6741, pp. 391–405. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21640-4_30
Carmona, J., Gavaldà, R.: Online techniques for dealing with concept drift in process mining. In: Hollmén, J., Klawonn, F., Tucker, A. (eds.) IDA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7619, pp. 90–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34156-4_10
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kaes, G., Rinderle-Ma, S. (2018). Improving the Usability of Process Change Trees Based on Change Similarity Measures. In: Gulden, J., Reinhartz-Berger, I., Schmidt, R., Guerreiro, S., Guédria, W., Bera, P. (eds) Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. BPMDS EMMSAD 2018 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 318. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91704-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91704-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91703-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91704-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)