Skip to main content

Approximation Algorithms for Sorting Permutations by Fragmentation-Weighted Operations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithms for Computational Biology (AlCoB 2018)

Abstract

Rearrangements are mutations that affect large portions of a genome. When comparing two genomes, one wants to find a sequence of rearrangements that transforms one into another. When we use permutations to represent the genomes, this reduces to the problem of sorting a permutation using some sequence of rearrangements. The traditional approach is to find a sequence of minimum length. However, some studies show that some rearrangements are more likely to disturb an individual, and so a weighted approach is closer to the real evolutionary process. Most weighted approaches consider that the cost of a rearrangement can be related to its type or to the number of elements affected by it. This work introduces a new type of cost function, which is related to the amount of fragmentation caused by a rearrangement. We present some results about lower and upper bounds for the fragmentation-weighted problems and the relation between the unweighted and the fragmentation-weighted approach. Our main results are 2-approximation algorithms for 5 versions of the fragmentation-weighted problem involving reversals and transpositions events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bader, M., Ohlebusch, E.: Sorting by weighted reversals, transpositions, and inverted transpositions. J. Comput. Biol. 14(5), 615–636 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bafna, V., Pevzner, P.A.: Sorting by transpositions. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 11(2), 224–240 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Berman, P., Hannenhalli, S., Karpinski, M.: 1.375-Approximation algorithm for sorting by reversals. In: Möhring, R., Raman, R. (eds.) ESA 2002. LNCS, vol. 2461, pp. 200–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45749-6_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Blanchette, M., Kunisawa, T., Sankoff, D.: Parametric genome rearrangement. Gene 172(1), GC11–GC17 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bulteau, L., Fertin, G., Rusu, I.: Sorting by transpositions is difficult. SIAM J. Comput. 26(3), 1148–1180 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Caprara, A.: Sorting permutations by reversals and eulerian cycle decompositions. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 12(1), 91–110 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, X.: On sorting unsigned permutations by double-cut-and-joins. J. Comb. Optim. 25(3), 339–351 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Elias, I., Hartman, T.: A 1.375-approximation algorithm for sorting by transpositions. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinf. 3(4), 369–379 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eriksen, N.: Combinatorics of Genome Rearrangements and Phylogeny. Teknologie Licentiat Thesis, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Stockholm (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hannenhalli, S., Pevzner, P.A.: Transforming cabbage into turnip: polynomial algorithm for sorting signed permutations by reversals. J. ACM 46(1), 1–27 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Rahman, A., Shatabda, S., Hasan, M.: An approximation algorithm for sorting by reversals and transpositions. J. Discrete Algorithms 6(3), 449–457 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Walter, M.E.M.T., Dias, Z., Meidanis, J.: Reversal and transposition distance of linear chromosomes. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval (SPIRE 1998), pp. 96–102. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the SĂ£o Paulo Research Foundation, FAPESP (grants 2013/08293-7, 2015/11937-9, 2016/14132-4, 2017/12646-3, and 2017/16871-1), the National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development, CNPq (grants 400487/2016-0, 425340/2016-3, and 131182/2017-0), and the program between the Brazilian Federal Agency for the Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education, CAPES, and the French Committee for the Evaluation of Academic and Scientific Cooperation with Brazil, COFECUB (grant 831/15).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexsandro Oliveira Alexandrino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alexandrino, A.O., Lintzmayer, C.N., Dias, Z. (2018). Approximation Algorithms for Sorting Permutations by Fragmentation-Weighted Operations. In: Jansson, J., MartĂ­n-Vide, C., Vega-RodrĂ­guez, M. (eds) Algorithms for Computational Biology. AlCoB 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10849. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91938-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91938-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91937-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91938-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics