Abstract
This chapter investigates design strategies for developing digital musical instruments (DMIs) for participatory music. In particular, we present strategies to enhance collaborative musical skills such as rhythmic entrainment and listening/responding to other participants: building skills of this kind has the capacity to motivate long-term usage and adoption of the DMI by a broad range of communities. The design strategies described here address the problems of developing DMIs for long-term use, both in collaborative, mixed skill level contexts, and in established musical and dance traditions. Interactive Tango Milonga—presented here as a case study—is an interactive dance system allowing social tango dancers to drive musical outcomes in real-time via their dance movement. Motion sensors are attached to dancers, and the signals from these sensors are sent to a computer, where an algorithm transforms them into tango music. The impact of the interactive tango system on the musical listening and response of tango dancer participants is analyzed and discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Turino (2008) uses the term “participatory music” to describe musical activities occurring on an on-going basis in which all attendees are expected to contribute movement or sound that is integral to the overall result, with the aim of social connection generally prioritized over musical outcome quality. This chapter employs his definition of “participatory music”.
- 2.
That is, musical interfaces intended for long-term use and adoption by a community of users rather than an idiosyncratic instrument intended for only a few performances, a single creator/performer, or one musical work.
- 3.
Since the musical interaction design considerations appropriate for stylized dance involve taking into account both movement constraints, such as embrace in Western partnered dancing, and cognitive constraints, such as the limited availability of dancer attention and working memory while immersed in improvising with each other.
- 4.
In traditional Western art music.
- 5.
For a demonstration of the system, visit http://interactivetango.com.
- 6.
Note that Argentine tango is distinct from ballroom tango, which, while influenced by early Argentine tango styles, originated elsewhere. Ballroom tango employs different movement techniques, and is more closely related to other European ballroom dances such as the foxtrot than Argentine tango.
- 7.
Both this reliance on time based structures from the music, and the intuitive nature of dancers’ response are consistent with both anecdotal evidence from the first author’s experience, and results from our research. See Sect. 18.4.5.2 for a summarization of the interview responses regarding existing dancer musicality strategies.
- 8.
In this context, ‘mistakes’ refers to musical and movement outcomes judged by dancers to be undesirable or unintentional in the context of tango social dance.
- 9.
Unless born completely hearing-impaired.
- 10.
Anecdotally and corroborated via responses to open-ended interview questions described in Sect. 18.4.5.
- 11.
Sforzando is a musical directive meaning play the passage suddenly, with marked emphasis.
- 12.
In using the terms “third-order” and “fourth-order” we are referring to taking the nth derivative of a given movement signal, generally with the original signal measuring position.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.
- 17.
The system also allows two-couple (i.e. four dancer) use, but this version has not yet been assessed.
- 18.
That is, sounded onsets every quarter or half note.
- 19.
Although the interactive tango system currently allows on-the-fly adjustment of this parameter, quantization was fixed to the 16th note for the user studies.
References
Anthony L (2016) AntConc Version 3.4.4, Waseda University. http://www.laurenceanthony.net. Accessed Mar 16 2017
Armstrong N (2007) An enactive approach to digital musical instrument design theory, models, techniques. VDM Verlag Dr., Müller, Saarbrücken
Barbosa J et al (2015) Designing DMIs for popular music in the Brazilian Northeast: lessons learned. In: Proceedings of 15th international conference on new interfaces for musical expression, Baton Rouge, 2015. ACM, pp 277–280
Behrends A, Müller S, Dziobek I (2012) Moving in and out of synchrony: a concept for a new intervention fostering empathy through interactional movement and dance. Arts Psychother 39(2):107–116
Bell A, Nguyen H, Eakin R, Houx P (2017) http://libcinder.org/. Accessed Feb 2017
Bevilacqua F et al (2007) Wireless sensor interface and gesture-follower for music pedagogy. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on new interfaces for musical expression, New York City, June 2007. ACM, pp 124–129
Blaine T, Perkis T (2000) The Jam-O-Drum interactive music system: a study in interaction design. In: Proceedings of the 3rd conference on designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, pp 165–173
Blaine T, Forlines C (2002) Jam-O-World: evolution of the Jam-O-Drum multi-player musical controller into the Jam-O-Whirl gaming interface. In: Proceedings of the 2002 conference on new interfaces for musical expression, National University of Singapore, pp 1–6
Blaine T, Fels S (2003) Contexts of collaborative musical experiences. In: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on new interfaces for musical expression, National University of Singapore, pp 129–134
Borgialli D (2015) The tango workbook. Author
Brown C (2017) Interactive Tango Milonga an interactive dance system for Argentine tango social dance. Dissertation, Arizona State University
Brown C, Paine G (2015a) Towards an interactive Tango Milonga. Paper presented at the 41st international computer music conference, Denton, TX, University of North Texas
Brown C, Paine G (2015b) Interactive Tango Milonga: designing internal experience. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on movement and computing—MOCO’15, Vancouver. ACM Press, pp 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/2790994.2791013
Brown C, Paine G (2016) Digital musical instruments for participatory music: designing internal experience. Paper presented at music and HCI workshop at ACM 33rd human factors in computing systems conference 2016 (CHI 2016), San Jose, CA
Bukvic I, Martin T, Standley E, Matthews M (2010) Introducing L2Ork: Linux laptop orchestra. In: Proceedings of the new interface for musical expression conference, pp 170–173
Castro D (1990) Argentine tango as social history, 1880–1955, Mellen Research University Press
Collier, S (2002) The birth of tango. In: G. Nouzeilles, G. Montaldo (eds) The Argentina reader. Duke University Press, pp 196–202
Cope D (1992) Computer modeling of musical intelligence in EMI. Comput Music J 16(2):69–83
Davidson N, Major CH (2014) Boundary crossings: Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and problem-based learning. J Excellence Coll Teach 25:7–55
Essl G, O’Modhrain S (2006) An enactive approach to the design of new tangible musical instruments. Organ Sound 11(3):285–296
Fancourt D et al (2016) Effects of group drumming interventions on anxiety, depression, social resilience and inflammatory immune response among mental health service users. PLoS ONE 11(3):e0151136
Feldmeier M, Paradiso J (2007) An interactive music environment for large groups with giveaway wireless motion sensors. Comput Music J 31(1):50–67
Fiebrink R (2017) http://wekinator.org. Accessed Feb 2017
Gibson BE (2006) Disability, connectivity and transgressing the autonomous body. J Med Humanit 27(3):187–196
Hogg B, Norman SJ (2013) Resistant materials in musical creativity. Contemp Music Rev 32:115–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/07494467.2013.775804
Holbrook MB, Schindler RM (1989) Some exploratory findings on the development of musical tastes. J Consum Res 16(1):119–124
Holland S, Fiebrink R (2019) Machine learning, music and creativity: an interview with Rebecca Fiebrink. In Holland S, Mudd T, Wilkie-McKenna K, McPherson A, Wanderley MM (eds) New directions in music and human-computer interaction. Springer, London. ISBN 978-3-319-92069-6
Hove M, Risen J (2009) It’s all in the timing: interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Soc Cogn 27(6):949–960
Jensenius A, Lyons M (2016) Trends at NIME-reflections on editing “A NIME Reader”. In: Proceedings of 16th international conference on new interfaces for musical expression, Queensland, 2016. ACM, pp 439–443
Ladas H, Ladas C (2013) Basics of musicality. In: Organic Tango School Red Series 2 expanded. http://www.theorganictangoschool.org/Didactic_Videos
Langdridge D (2007) Phenomenological psychology: theory, research and method. Pearson Education, Irving, TX
Loke L, Robertson T (2013) Moving and making strange: an embodied approach to movement-based interaction design. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact (TOCHI) 20(1):7
Matyja J, Schiavio A (2013) Enactive music cognition: Background and research themes. Constr Found 8(3):351–357
Morreale, F, McPherson A (2017) Design for longevity: ongoing use of instruments from NIME 2010-14. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on new interfaces for musical expression, Copenhagen, May 2017. ACM pp 192–197
Merritt C (2012) Tango Nuevo, University Press of Florida
Nesfield J (2012) Strategies for engagement in computer-mediated musical performance. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2012 conference for new interfaces for musical expression, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Olszewski B (2008) El cuerpo del baile: the kinetic and social fundaments of tango. Body Soc 14(2):63–81
Omodei M, McLennan J, Wearing A (2005) How expertise is applied in real-world dynamic environments: head mounted video and cued recall as a methodology for studying routines of decision making. In: The routines of decision making, pp 271–288
Paine G, Salmon R (2012) The thinking head project: knowledge environments. Int JArts Technol 10(10)
Paine G (2015) Interaction as material: the techno-somatic dimension. Organ Sound 20(1):82–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771814000466
Pinniger R, Thorsteinsson E, Brown R, McKinley P (2013) Tango dance can reduce distress and insomnia in people with self-referred affective symptoms. Am J Dance Ther 35(1):60–77
Rizzolatti G, Sinigaglia C (2008) Mirrors in the brain: how our minds share actions and emotions. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Schiphorst T (2007) Really, really small: the palpability of the invisible. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on creativity and cognition, ACM Press, pp 7–16
Schneider J et al (2015) Augmenting the senses: a review on sensor-based learning support. Sensors 15(2):4097–4133
Seyler E (2008) The tango philadelphia story: a mixed-methods study of building community, enhancing lives, and exploring spirituality through argentine tango. Temple University
Sinnott L (2008) Mapping strategies for the augmented tango shoe. Master’s thesis, New York University
Terrill M (2015) Laptop orchestra pushes buttons and boundaries. ASU Now
Trueman D (2007) Why a laptop orchestra? Organ Sound 12(2):171. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135577180700180X
Turino T (2008) Music as social life: the politics of participation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Ulyate R, Bianciardi D (2002) The interactive dance club: avoiding chaos in a multi-participant environment. Comput Music J 26(3):40–49. https://doi.org/10.1162/014892602320582963
van Hout B, Giacolini L, Hengeveld B, Funk M, Frens J (2014) Experio: adesign for novel audience participation in club settings. Proceedings of the 14th international conference on new interfaces for musical expression
Wallis I (2013) Designing experiential media for volitional usage: an approach based on music and other hobbies. Dissertation, Arizona State University
Wang G, Trueman D, Smallwood S, Cook P (2008) The laptop orchestra as classroom. Comput Music J 32(1):26–37
Acknowledgements
Some passages and figures in this chapter have previously appeared in the first author’s dissertation (Brown 2017).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brown, C., Paine, G. (2019). A Case Study in Collaborative Learning via Participatory Music Interactive Systems: Interactive Tango Milonga. In: Holland, S., Mudd, T., Wilkie-McKenna, K., McPherson, A., Wanderley, M. (eds) New Directions in Music and Human-Computer Interaction. Springer Series on Cultural Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92069-6_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92069-6_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92068-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92069-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)