Skip to main content

Designing Fair, Efficient, and Interpretable Policies for Prioritizing Homeless Youth for Housing Resources

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10848))

Abstract

We consider the problem of designing fair, efficient, and interpretable policies for prioritizing heterogeneous homeless youth on a waiting list for scarce housing resources of different types. We focus on point-based policies that use features of the housing resources (e.g., permanent supportive housing, rapid rehousing) and the youth (e.g., age, history of substance use) to maximize the probability that the youth will have a safe and stable exit from the housing program. The policies can be used to prioritize waitlisted youth each time a housing resource is procured. Our framework provides the policy-maker the flexibility to select both their desired structure for the policy and their desired fairness requirements. Our approach can thus explicitly trade-off interpretability and efficiency while ensuring that fairness constraints are met. We propose a flexible data-driven mixed-integer optimization formulation for designing the policy, along with an approximate formulation which can be solved efficiently for broad classes of interpretable policies using Bender’s decomposition. We evaluate our framework using real-world data from the United States homeless youth housing system. We show that our framework results in policies that are more fair than the current policy in place and than classical interpretable machine learning approaches while achieving a similar (or higher) level of overall efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    To date there is no regulation in place that enforces the current policy. However, previous analysis has shown that communities follow this policy in practice [20].

  2. 2.

    Transition Age Youth (TAY) is a Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool that can be accessed at http://orgcode.nationbuilder.com/tools_you_can_use. It is incorporated work from the TAY Triage Tool of Rice [23] which can be accessed at http://www.csh.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/TAY_TriageTool_2014.pdf.

  3. 3.

    By construction, there will be at most one youth in this set. Moreover, since there is a severe shortage of houses, we can assume w.l.o.g. that this set will never be empty.

  4. 4.

    These experiments were run on a 2.0 GHz Intel Core i7 processor machine with 4 GB RAM and all optimization problems were solved with Gurobi v7.0.

References

  1. Adamczyk, M., Sankowski, P., Zhang, Q.: Efficiency of truthful and symmetric mechanisms in one-sided matching. In: Lavi, R. (ed.) SAGT 2014. LNCS, vol. 8768, pp. 13–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44803-8_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertsimas, D., Farias, V.F., Trichakis, N.: Fairness, efficiency, and flexibility in organ allocation for kidney transplantation. Oper. Res. 61(1), 73–87 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bertsimas, D., King, A., Mazumder, R.: Best subset selection via a modern optimization lens. Ann. Stat. 44(2), 813–852 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchbinder, N., Jain, K., Naor, J.S.: Online primal-dual algorithms for maximizing ad-auctions revenue. In: Arge, L., Hoffmann, M., Welzl, E. (eds.) ESA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4698, pp. 253–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75520-3_24

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan, H., Rice, E., Vayanos, P., Tambe, M., Morton, M.: Evidence from the past: AI decision aids to improve housing systems for homeless youth. In: AAAI 2017. Fall Symposium Series (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Che, Z., Purushotham, S., Khemani, R., Liu, Y.: Interpretable deep models for ICU outcome prediction. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, vol. 2016, p. 371. American Medical Informatics Association (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Devanur, N.R., Jain, K., Sivan, B., Wilkens, C.A.: Near optimal online algorithms and fast approximation algorithms for resource allocation problems. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 29–38. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dughmi, S., Ghosh, A.: Truthful assignment without money. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 325–334. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Housing and Urban Development (HUD): Coordinated Entry Policy Brief (2015). https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/Coordinated-Entry-Policy-Brief.pdf

  10. Huang, L.-T., Gromiha, M.M., Ho, S.-Y.: iPTREE-STAB: interpretable decision tree based method for predicting protein stability changes upon mutations. Bioinformatics 23(10), 1292–1293 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kong, N., Schaefer, A.J., Hunsaker, B., Roberts, M.S.: Maximizing the efficiency of the U.S. liver allocation system through region design. Manag. Sci. 56(12), 2111–2122 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lakkaraju, H., Bach, S.H., Jure, L.: Interpretable decision sets: a joint framework for description and prediction. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1675–1684. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leshno, J.D.: Dynamic matching in overloaded waiting lists (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Letham, B., Rudin, C., McCormick, T.H., Madigan, D.: Interpretable classifiers using rules and bayesian analysis: building a better stroke prediction model. Ann. Appl. Stat. 9(3), 1350–1371 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Lou, Y., Caruana, R., Gehrke, J.: Intelligible models for classification and regression. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 150–158. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lou, Y., Caruana, R., Gehrke, J., Hooker, G.: Accurate intelligible models with pairwise interactions. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 623–631. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mazumder, R., Radchenko, P.: The discrete dantzig selector: estimating sparse linear models via mixed integer linear optimization. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 63(5), 3053–3075 (2017)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Mazumder, R., Radchenko, P., Dedieu, A.: Subset selection with shrinkage: sparse linear modeling when the SNR is low. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.03288 (2017)

  19. Mehta, A., Saberi, A., Vazirani, U., Vazirani, V.: Adwords and generalized online matching. J. ACM (JACM) 54(5), 22 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. The U.S. Department of Housing: OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING Urban Development, and DEVELOPMENT. The 2016 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR) to Congress (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. United States Interagency Council on Homelessness. Opening doors: federal strategic plan to prevent and end homelessness (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pearson, C.L.: The applicability of housing first models to homeless persons with serious mental illness: final report. Technical report, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rice, E.: Assessment Tools for Prioritizing Housing Resources for Homeless Youth (2017). https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56fb3022d210b891156b3948/t/5887e0bc8419c20e9a7dfa81/1485299903906/Rice-Assessment-Tools-for-Youth-2017.pdf

  24. Su, X., Zenios, S.A.: Patient choice in kidney allocation: a sequential stochastic assignment model. Oper. Res. 53(3), 443–455 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Su, X., Zenios, S.A.: Recipient choice can address the efficiency-equity trade-off in kidney transplantation: a mechanism design model. Manag. Sci. 52(11), 1647–1660 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Thakral, N.: Matching with stochastic arrival. In: EC, p. 343 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Toro, P.A., Lesperance, T.M., Braciszewski, J.M.: The heterogeneity of homeless youth in America: examining typologies. National Alliance to End Homelessness, Washington, D.C. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Valdes, G., Marcio Luna, J., Eaton, E., Simone, C.B.: MediBoost: a patient stratification tool for interpretable decision making in the era of precision medicine. Sci. Rep. 6 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, T., Rudin, C., Doshi-Velez, F., Liu, Y., Klampfl, E., MacNeille, P.: A bayesian framework for learning rule sets for interpretable classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18(70), 1–37 (2017)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phebe Vayanos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Azizi, M.J., Vayanos, P., Wilder, B., Rice, E., Tambe, M. (2018). Designing Fair, Efficient, and Interpretable Policies for Prioritizing Homeless Youth for Housing Resources. In: van Hoeve, WJ. (eds) Integration of Constraint Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Operations Research. CPAIOR 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10848. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93031-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93031-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93030-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93031-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics