Skip to main content

Dealing with Demand Uncertainty in Service Network and Load Plan Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Integration of Constraint Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Operations Research (CPAIOR 2018)

Abstract

Less-than-Truckload (LTL) transportation carriers plan for their next operating season by deciding: (1) a load plan, which specifies how shipments are routed through the terminal network from origins to destinations, and (2) how many trailers to operate between each pair of terminals in the network. Most carriers also require that the load plan is such that shipments at an intermediate terminal and having the same ultimate destination are loaded onto trailers headed to a unique next terminal regardless of their origins. In practice, daily variations in demand are handled by relaxing this requirement and possibly loading shipments to an alternative next terminal. We introduce the p-alt model, which integrates routing and capacity decisions, and which allows p choices for the next terminal for shipments with a particular ultimate destination. We further introduce and computationally test three solution methods for the stochastic p-alt model, which shows that much can be gained from using the p-alt model and explicitly considering demand uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Crainic, T.G.: Service network design in freight transportation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 122(2), 272–288 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wieberneit, N.: Service network design for freight transportation: a review. OR Spectr. 30(1), 77–112 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Powell, W.B.: A local improvement heuristic for the design of less-than-truckload motor carrier networks. Transp. Sci. 20(4), 246–257 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Powell, W.B., Koskosidis, I.A.: Shipment routing algorithms with tree constraints. Transp. Sci. 26(3), 230–245 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jarrah, A.I., Johnson, E., Neubert, L.C.: Large-scale, less-than-truckload service network design. Oper. Res. 57(3), 609–625 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lindsey, K., Erera, A., Savelsbergh, M.: Improved integer programming-based neighborhood search for less-than-truckload load plan design. Transp. Sci. December 2017 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2016.0700

  7. Gendron, B., Crainic, T.G., Frangioni, A.: Multicommodity capacitated network design. In: Sansò, B., Soriano, P. (eds.) Telecommunications Network Planning. CRT, pp. 1–19. Springer, Boston, MA (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5087-7_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoff, A., Lium, A.G., Løkketangen, A., Crainic, T.G.: A metaheuristic for stochastic service network design. J. Heuristics 16(5), 653–679 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lium, A.G., Crainic, T.G., Wallace, S.W.: A study of demand stochasticity in service network design. Transp. Sci. 43(2), 144–157 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Crainic, T.G., Fu, X., Gendreau, M., Rei, W., Wallace, S.W.: Progressive hedging-based metaheuristics for stochastic network design. Networks 58(2), 114–124 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kleywegt, A.J., Shapiro, A., Homem-de Mello, T.: The sample average approximation method for stochastic discrete optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 12(2), 479–502 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, D., Pardalos, P.M.: A solution approach to the fixed charge network flow problem using a dynamic slope scaling procedure. Oper. Res. Lett. 24(4), 195–203 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Bienstock, D., Chopra, S., Günlük, O., Tsai, C.Y.: Minimum cost capacity installation for multicommodity network flows. Math. Program. 81(2), 177–199 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Ahmad Baubaid would like to acknowledge financial support from the King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad Baubaid .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Baubaid, A., Boland, N., Savelsbergh, M. (2018). Dealing with Demand Uncertainty in Service Network and Load Plan Design. In: van Hoeve, WJ. (eds) Integration of Constraint Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Operations Research. CPAIOR 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10848. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93031-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93031-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93030-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93031-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics