Skip to main content

Topic-Specific Retweet Count Ranking for Weibo

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10939))

Abstract

In this paper, we study topic-specific retweet count ranking problem in Weibo. Two challenges make this task nontrivial. Firstly, traditional methods cannot derive effective feature for tweets, because in topic-specific setting, tweets usually have too many shared contents to distinguish them. We propose a LSTM-embedded autoencoder to generate tweet features with the insight that any different prefixes of tweet text is a possible distinctive feature. Secondly, it is critical to fully catch the meaning of topic in topic-specific setting, but Weibo can provide little information about topic. We leverage real-time news information from Toutiao to enrich the meaning of topic, as more than 85% topics are headline news. We evaluate the proposed components based on ablation methods, and compare the overall solution with a recently-proposed tensor factorization model. Extensive experiments on real Weibo data show the effectiveness and flexibility of our methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We measure the popularity of a tweet by its retweet count. As pointed out by [15, 25, 27, 28], retweet is the key mechanism for information diffusion on micro-blogging services. A larger retweet count usually means that more users have seen, and will see, the corresponding tweet and topic, and that we will further get more benefits. In fact, researchers often use popular level as the synonym of retweet count [12, 14].

  2. 2.

    Due to space limitation, we move the features used for building Candidate Tweet Filter into the supplemental material.

  3. 3.

    Due to space limitation, we move the user features into the supplemental material.

  4. 4.

    http://www.paddlepaddle.org/.

  5. 5.

    It can be used to determine if two sets of data are significantly different from each other: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Student%27s_t-test.

References

  1. Abdullah, N.A., Nishioka, D., Tanaka, Y., Murayama, Y.: User’s action and decision making of retweet messages towards reducing misinformation spread during disaster. J. Inf. Process. 23(1), 31–40 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andrew, B.C.: Media-generated shortcuts: do newspaper headlines present another roadblock for low-information rationality? Harv. Int. J. Press/Polit. 12(2), 24–43 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bengio, Y., Ducharme, R., Vincent, P., Janvin, C.: A neural probabilistic language model. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 1137–1155 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3(January), 993–1022 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Burges, C.J.: From ranknet to lambdarank to lambdamart: an overview. Learning 11, 23–581 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Can, E.F., Oktay, H., Manmatha, R.: Predicting retweet count using visual cues. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, CIKM 2013, pp. 1481–1484. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cao, Z., Qin, T., Liu, T.Y., Tsai, M.F., Li, H.: Learning to rank: from pairwise approach to listwise approach. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2007, pp. 129–136. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cho, K., Van Merriënboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., Bengio, Y.: Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078 (2014)

  9. Cui, P., Wang, F., Sun, L.: Who should share what?: item-level social influence prediction for users and posts ranking. In: International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 185–194 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dor, D.: On newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers. J. Pragmat. 35(5), 695–721 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Feng, W., Wang, J.: Retweet or not?: personalized tweet re-ranking. In: Proceedings of the Sixth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2013, pp. 577–586. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoang, T.A., Lim, E.P.: Retweeting: an act of viral users, susceptible users, or viral topics? In: SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoang, T.A., Lim, E.P.: Microblogging content propagation modeling using topic-specific behavioral factors. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 28(9), 2407–2422 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hong, L., Dan, O., Davison, B.D.: Predicting popular messages in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, WWW 2011, pp. 57–58. ACM, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jenders, M., Kasneci, G., Naumann, F.: Analyzing and predicting viral tweets. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2013 Companion, pp. 657–664. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S.: What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2010, pp. 591–600. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Luo, Z., Osborne, M., Tang, J., Wang, T.: Who will retweet me?: finding retweeters in Twitter. In: International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2013, pp. 869–872. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Macskassy, S.A., Michelson, M.: Why do people retweet? Anti-homophily wins the day! In: ICWSM, pp. 209–216 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Meier, F., Elsweiler, D., Wilson, M.L.: More than liking and bookmarking? Towards understanding Twitter favouriting behaviour. In: ICWSM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Myers, S.A., Zhu, C., Leskovec, J.: Information diffusion and external influence in networks. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2012, pp. 33–41. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shang, L., Lu, Z., Li, H.: Neural responding machine for short-text conversation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02364 (2015)

  22. Uysal, I., Croft, W.B.: User oriented tweet ranking: a filtering approach to microblogs. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2011, pp. 2261–2264. ACM, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, Y., Xiao, Y., Ma, C., Xiao, Z.: Improving users’ demographic prediction via the videos they talk about. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Austin, Texas, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1359–1368, November 2016

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xiao, Y., Zhao, W.X., Wang, K., Xiao, Z.: Knowledge sharing via social login: exploiting microblogging service for warming up social question answering websites. In: COLING, pp. 656–666. Citeseer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yang, Z., Guo, J., Cai, K., Tang, J., Li, J., Zhang, L., Su, Z.: Understanding retweeting behaviors in social networks. In: ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1633–1636 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yuan, N.J., Zhong, Y., Zhang, F., Xie, X., Lin, C.Y., Rui, Y.: Who will reply to/retweet this tweet?: the dynamics of intimacy from online social interactions. In: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2016, pp. 3–12. ACM, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, Q., Gong, Y., Guo, Y., Huang, X.: Retweet behavior prediction using hierarchical Dirichlet process. In: Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 403–409 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, Q., Gong, Y., Wu, J., Huang, H., Huang, X.: Retweet prediction with attention-based deep neural network. In: ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 75–84 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61572044.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhen Xiao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 241 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mao, H., Xiao, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Xiao, Z. (2018). Topic-Specific Retweet Count Ranking for Weibo. In: Phung, D., Tseng, V., Webb, G., Ho, B., Ganji, M., Rashidi, L. (eds) Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. PAKDD 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10939. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93040-4_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93040-4_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93039-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93040-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics