Skip to main content

Living with Disabilities – The Many Faces of Smart Home Technology Acceptance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 869))

Abstract

To face the challenges of increasing care needs due to demographic change, the development of smart home and Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) technologies present one approach, which is continuously forwarded. Besides aspects of technical development and implementation, user acceptance of diverse stakeholders plays a major role for a successful rollout and sustainable adoption of those technologies. So far, user acceptance research in this context has concentrated mostly on age-related issues. In contrast, disabilities and related care needs have hardly been researched yet. The current study focused on persons having different experiences with disabilities and care needs. In a qualitative interview pre-study (n = 9) and a follow-up quantitative online questionnaire study (n = 279) perceived benefits and barriers, use conditions, and acceptance of AAL technologies were contrasted. Four user groups were under study: disabled participants, relatives of disabled persons, professional caregivers, and, as a control group, persons without experience with disabilities. Results indicate that disabled and care-needy people show a higher acceptance and intention to use an AAL system than not-experienced people and especially professional caregivers. The motives for acceptance and rejection differ strongly regarding user diversity as well. The results contribute to a better understanding of user-specific acceptance of smart home and AAL technologies and show that the integration of diverse user groups into the technologies’ design and evaluation process is necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bloom, D.E., Canning, D.: Global Demographic Change: Dimensions and Economic Significance. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. 10817 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Walker, A., Maltby, T.: Active ageing: a strategic policy solution to demographic ageing in the European Union. Int. J. Soc. Welfare 21, 117–130 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wiles, J.L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J., Allen, R.E.S.: The meaning of “ageing in place” to older people. Gerontologist (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shaw, J.E., Sicree, R.A., Zimmet, P.Z.: Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diab. Res. Clin. Pract. 87(1), 4–14 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wild, S., Roglic, G., Green, A., Sicree, R., King, H.: Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diab. Care 27(5), 1047–1053 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Roger, V.L., Go, A.S., Lloyd-Jones, D.M., Adams, R.J., Berry, J.D., Brown, T.M., et al.: American heart association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. heart disease and stroke statistics–2011 update: a report from the american heart association. Circulation 123(4), e18–e209 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Geenen, S.J., Powers, L.E., Sells, W.: Understanding the role of health care providers during the transition of adolescents with disabilities and special health care needs. J. Adolesc. Health 32(3), 225–233 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Poore, C.: Disability in Twentieth-Century German Culture. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmitt, J.M.: Innovative medical technologies help ensure improved patient care and cost-effectiveness. J. Med. Mark.: Device Diagn. Pharm. Mark. 2(2), 174–178 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng, J., Chen, X., Shen, M.: A framework for daily activity monitoring and fall detection based on surface electromyography and accelerometer signals. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 17(1), 38–45 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baig, M.M., Gholamhosseini, H.: Smart health monitoring systems: an overview of design and modeling. J. Med. Syst. 37(2), 1–14 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rashidi, P., Mihailidis, A.: A survey on ambient-assisted living tools for older adults. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 17(3), 579–590 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fuchsberger, V.: Ambient assisted living: elderly people’s needs and how to face them. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Semantic Ambient Media Experiences, pp. 21–24. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Demiris, G., Hensel, B.K., Skubic, M., Rantz, M.: Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 24(1), 120–124 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilkowska, W., Gaul, S., Ziefle, M.: A small but significant difference – the role of gender on acceptance of medical assistive technologies. In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds.) USAB 2010. LNCS, vol. 6389, pp. 82–100. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16607-5_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Silverstone, R., Morley, D., Dahlberg A, Livingstone, S.: Families, Technologies and Consumption: Household and Information and Communication Technologies. Uxbridge: Centre for Research into Innovation, Culture & Technology, Brunel University (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Casenio: Casenio - intelligente Hilfe- & Komfortsysteme [intelligent support and comfort systems] (2016). https://www.casenio.de/

  18. Essence: Smart Care - Care@ Home Product Suite (2016). http://www.essence-grp.com/smart-care/care-at-home-pers

  19. EarlySense: EarlySense All-in-One System (2016). http://www.earlysense.com/

  20. Tunstall: Tunstall - Solutions for Healthcare Professionals (2016). www.tunstallhealthcare.com.au

  21. Sixsmith, A., Meuller, S., Lull, F., Klein, M., Bierhoff, I., Delaney, S., Savage, R.: SOPRANO – an ambient assisted living system for supporting older people at home. In: Mokhtari, M., Khalil, I., Bauchet, J., Zhang, D., Nugent, C. (eds.) ICOST 2009. LNCS, vol. 5597, pp. 233–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02868-7_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Gövercin, M., Meyer, S., Schellenbach, M., Steinhagen-Thiessen, E., Weiss, B., Haesner, M.: SmartSenior@home: acceptance of an integrated ambient assisted living system. Results of a clinical field trial in 35 households. Inform. Health Soc. Care 41, 1–18 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kleinberger, T., Becker, M., Ras, E., Holzinger, A., Müller, P.: Ambient intelligence in assisted living: enable elderly people to handle future interfaces. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) UAHCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4555, pp. 103–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73281-5_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Beringer, R., Sixsmith, A., Campo, M., Brown, J., McCloskey, R.: The “acceptance” of ambient assisted living: developing an alternate methodology to this limited research lens. In: Abdulrazak, B., Giroux, S., Bouchard, B., Pigot, H., Mokhtari, M. (eds.) ICOST 2011. LNCS, vol. 6719, pp. 161–167. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21535-3_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Sun, H., De Florio, V., Gui, N., Blondia, C.: The missing ones: key ingredients towards effective ambient assisted living systems. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 2(2), 109–120 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M., Himmel, S.: Perceptions of personal privacy in smart home technologies: do user assessments vary depending on the research method? In: Tryfonas, T., Askoxylakis, I. (eds.) HAS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9190, pp. 592–603. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20376-8_53

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Kowalewski, S., Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M.: Accounting for user diversity in the acceptance of medical assistive technologies. In: Szomszor, M., Kostkova, P. (eds.) eHealth 2010. LNICST, vol. 69, pp. 175–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23635-8_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Demiris, G., Rantz, M., Aud, M., Marek, K., Tyrer, H., Skubic, M., Hussam, A.: Older adults’ attitudes towards and perceptions of “smart home” technologies: a pilot study. Med. Inform. Internet 29(2), 87–94 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ziefle, M., Himmel, S., Wilkowska, W.: When your living space knows what you do: acceptance of medical home monitoring by different technologies. In: Holzinger, A., Simonic, K.-M. (eds.) USAB 2011. LNCS, vol. 7058, pp. 607–624. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25364-5_43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Himmel, S., Ziefle, M.: Smart home medical technologies: users’ requirements for conditional acceptance. I-Com 15(1), 39–50 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. de Ruyter, B., Pelgrim, E.: Ambient assisted-living research in carelab. Interactions 14(4), 30–33 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Brauner, P., Holzinger, A., Ziefle, M.: Ubiquitous computing at its best: serious exercise games for older adults in ambient assisted living environments–a technology acceptance perspective. EAI Endorsed Trans. Serious Games 15, 1–12 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gentry, T.: Smart homes for people with neurological disability: state of the art. NeuroRehabilitation 25(3), 209–217 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Harris, J.: The use, role and application of advanced technology in the lives of disabled people in the UK. Disabil. Soc. 25(4), 427–439 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. López, S.A., Corno, F., Russis, L.D.: Supporting caregivers in assisted living facilities for persons with disabilities: a user study. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 14(1), 133–144 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mortenson, W.B., Demers, L., Fuhrer, M.J., Jutai, J.W., Lenker, J., DeRuyter, F.: Effects of an assistive technology intervention on older adults with disabilities and their informal caregivers: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil./Assoc. Acad. Physiatr. 92(4), 297–306 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Larizza, M.F., Zukerman, I., Bohnert, F., Busija, L., Bentley, S.A., Russell, R.A., Rees, G.: In-home monitoring of older adults with vision impairment: exploring patients’, caregivers’ and professionals’ views. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 21(1), 56–63 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mayring, P.: Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt (2014). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173

  39. Himmel, S., Ziefle, M., Lidynia, C., Holzinger, A.: Older users’ wish list for technology attributes. In: Cuzzocrea, A., Kittl, C., Simos, D.E., Weippl, E., Xu, L. (eds.) CD-ARES 2013. LNCS, vol. 8127, pp. 16–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40511-2_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. van Heek, J., Himmel, S., Ziefle, M.: Helpful but spooky? Acceptance of AAL-systems contrasting user groups with focus on disabilities and care needs. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health (ICT4AWE 2017), pp. 78–90 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M., Alagöz, F.: How user diversity and country of origin impact the readiness to adopt E-health technologies: an intercultural comparison. Work (Read. Mass.) 41(Suppl. 1), 2072–2080 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Klack, L., Ziefle, M., Wilkowska, W., Kluge, J.: Telemedical versus conventional heart patient monitoring: a survey study with German physicians. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 29(4), 378–383 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. van Heek, J., Himmel, S., Ziefle, M.: Privacy, data security, and the acceptance of AAL-systems – a user-specific perspective. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) ITAP 2017. LNCS, vol. 10297, pp. 38–56. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58530-7_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all participants for their patience and openness to share opinions on a novel technology and the sensitive topics disabilities and care needs. Furthermore, the authors want to thank Lisa Portz for research assistance. This work was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research Project Whistle (16SV7530).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia van Heek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

van Heek, J., Himmel, S., Ziefle, M. (2018). Living with Disabilities – The Many Faces of Smart Home Technology Acceptance. In: Röcker, C., O’Donoghue, J., Ziefle, M., Maciaszek, L., Molloy, W. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health. ICT4AWE 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 869. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93644-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93644-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93643-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93644-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics