Abstract
As an IT research agenda, the Internet of Things is often framed according to technical and economic issues, such as protocols, standards, job-creation potential, etc. We argue that IoT also constitutes a cultural and aesthetic vision, that is, a projected image of urban- or region-scale beauty, in which lives are pursued in more meaningful and fulfilling ways than before. In HCI and related disciplines, aesthetics—when not outright dismissed as too subjective and/or confusing to engage—is commonly investigated as individual judgments about individual interfaces. This is a problem, because we know that technologies can produce ugly and unlivable environments at scale—from nuclear disaster sites to urban desolation caused in large part by the automobile. Aesthetic IoT is not a matter of making device surfaces more pretty, but of thinking deeply about the ways it will shape how we live; after all, urban desolation didn’t happen because roads weren’t painted attractively, but because roads disrupted communities and their established ways of life. This chapter demonstrates that aesthetic theory provides concepts sufficient to engage matters of IoT aesthetics in precise and pragmatic ways. It does so by analyzing a policy intended to beautify a major city in Asia alongside aesthetic interpretations of two design initiatives contemporaneous with it: an agricultural IoT project that proposes a computationally enabled new intimacy between humans and their land, and a kitchen design company that innovates not only on manufacturing materials but also on the aesthetic conventions needed for consumers to recognize those material properties as beautiful.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Robertson, T., Koreshoff, T. L., Robertson, T., & Leong, T. W. (2013). Internet of things: A review of literature and products. OzCHI, 13, 335–344.
Wright, A. (2017). Mapping the internet of things. Communications of the ACM, 60, 16–18. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3028256.3014392.
Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2014). From, “smart objects” to “social objects”: The next evolutionary step of the internet of things. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(1), 97–105.
Lingel, J. (2016). The poetics of socio-technical space. Chi, 16, 815–826.
Nansen, B., van Ryn, L., Vetere, F., Robertson, T., Brereton, M., & Douish, P. (2014). An internet of social things. In Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures the Future of Design—OzCHI ’14 (pp. 87–96).
Höök, K. (2015). Building Folkhemmet with the Internet of Things.
Freeman, G., Bardzell, S., & Bardzell, J. (2018). Bottom-up imaginaries: The cultural-technical practice of inventing regional advantage through IT R&D. In Proceedings of CHI’18: World Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM: New York.
Bardzell, J., & Bardzell, S. (2014). ‘‘A great and troubling beauty’’: Cognitive speculation and ubiquitous computing. In G. Bell, P. Dourish, & J. Kaye (Eds.), Special issue on Science Fiction and Ubiquitous Computing. Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18:779–794.
Bardzell, S., Bardzell, J., & Ng, S. (2017). Supporting cultures of making: Technology, policy, visions, and myths. In Proceedings of CHI’17: World Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM.
Freeman, G., Bardzell, J., & Bardzell, S. (2017). Aspirational design and messy democracy: Partisanship, policy, and hope in an Asian city. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW (pp. 404–416).
Bardzell, S., Rosner, D., & Bardzell, J. (2012). Crafting quality in design: integrity, creativity, and public sensibility. In Proceedings of DIS’12: Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 11–20). New York: ACM.
Boellstorff, T. (2008). The coming of age in second life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton University Press.
Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., & Taylor, T. L. (Eds.). (2012). Ethnography and virtual worlds: A handbook of method. Princeton University Press.
Hine, C. (2000).Virtual ethnography. Sage.
Horst, H. A., Miller, D., & Horst, H. (Eds.). (2012). Digital anthropology. Bloomsbury Academic.
Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). The internet: An ethnographic approach. Bloomsbury Academic.
Nardi, B. (2010). My life as a night elf priest: An anthropological account of world of warcraft. University of Michigan Press.
Asia Silicon Valley Development Plan. National Development Council, 2016. file:///Users/szu-yuliu/Desktop/The Asia Silicon Valley Development Plan (final-1)_上網版.pdf.
Ferry, T. (2017). The 5 + 2 industrial innovation plan. Taiwan Business TOPICS, 2017. https://topics.amcham.com.tw/2017/05/52-industrial-innovation-plan/.
Department of Urban Development Taipei City Government. 2010–2011 Annual Report. 2011.
Miazzo, F., & Kee, T. (ed.). (2014). We own the city: Enabling community practice in architecture and urban planning. Valiz*Trancity.
Taipei City Government. Taipei Yearbook 2010. 2010.
Taipei City Government. Taipei Yearbook 2012. 2012.
Juan, Y., Kuo, F., & Perng, Y. (2012). Taipei beautiful: How does government policy affect architectural engineering? Advanced Building Materials, 461, 725–732.
Wei, L. L. (2014). Protest art and urban renewal in Taiwan: Convivial combats from 2010–2013.
Bardzell, S., Bardzell, J., & Ng, S. (2017). Supporting cultures of making: Technology, policy, visions, and myths.
Bardzell, S., Rosner, D., & Bardzell, J. (2012). Crafting quality in design: Integrity, creativity, and public sensibility. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 11–20).
Lindtner, S., Bardzell, S., & Bardzell, J. (2016). Reconstituting the utopian vision of making: HCI after technosolutionism. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI ’16, May 2016 (pp. 1390–1402).
Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., & Hansen, L. K. (2015). Immodest proposals: research through design and knowledge. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI’15 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vol. 1, pp. 2093–2102).
Hartmann, J., Sutcliffe, A., & De Angeli, A. (2008). Towards a theory of user judgment of aesthetics and user interface quality. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 15(4, Article 15), 30 pp. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1460355.1460357.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1986). The relevance of the beautiful and other essays (Trans.: N. Walker). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Eldridge, R. (2003). An introduction to the philosophy of art. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Beardsley, M. (1981). Aesthetics: Problems in the philosophy of criticism (2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Folkmann, M. N. (2013). The aesthetics of imagination in design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Balasubramanian, R., Gao, X., Hatakeyama, S., Hwang, J., & Tsai, C. (2017). Overview of the Special Issue “PM 2 . 5 in Asia” for 2015 Asian Aerosol Conference (pp. 351–355).
World Health Organization. (2006). WHO Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide: Global update 2005. Geneva: Switzerland.
World Health Organization. (2013). Health effects of particulate matter: Policy implications for countries in eastern Europe, Caucasus and central Asia. Journal of the Korean Medical Association, 50(2), 20.
Hsu, S. (2015). Cancers still main cause of death: Health ministry. Taipei Times, 2015. http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2015/06/18/2003620986.
Chen, L.-J., Hsu, W., Cheng, M., & Lee, H.-C. (2016). DEMO: LASS: A location-aware sensing system for participatory PM2.5 monitoring. In 14th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, MobiSys 2016 (p. 98).
City Takes Action to Raise Awareness on PM2.5 Health Risks. Taipei City Government, 2016. http://tcgwww.taipei.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=168374269&ctNode=8472&mp=100002.
Hsu, W. (2015). LASS: All and future. GitHub, 2015. https://github.com/LinkItONEDevGroup/LASS/blob/master/Doc/LASS-AllandFuture.pdf.
LASS Projects. LASS, 2016. http://lass-net.org/category/projects/.
Dewey, J. (1980). Art as experience. New York: Perigee.
McCarthy, J., & Wright, P. (2004). Technology as experience.
Carroll, N. (2001). Beyond aesthetics: Philosophical essays.
. Initium Media, 2017. https://theinitium.com/article/20170308-city-design-tw-zinc-factory-brand-no-30/.
Office for Product Design. Giftware Range. 2017. https://www.officeforproductdesign.com/projects/GiftwareRange/.
Margolis, J. (1980). Art and philosophy: Conceptual Issues in aesthetics. Branch Line.
Davies, D. (2005). Medium in art. In J. Levinson (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of aesthetics (pp. 181–191). Oxford University Press.
Davies, D. (2013). Categories of art. In B. N. Gaut & D. Lopes (Eds.), The Routledge companion to aesthetics (pp. 224–234). Routledge.
Binkley, T. (1977). Piece: Contra aesthetics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 35(3), 265–277.
Tetra. no.30. http://no30-inc.com/product/tetra.
. Shopping Design, 2016, 44–49. papers2://publication/uuid/C39872F0-5720-41C7-915B-F17BFF9F5CB6.
Bardzell, J. (2009). Interaction criticism and aesthetics. In Proceedings of the 27th SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2357–2366).
Bardzell, J. (2011). Interaction criticism: An introduction to the practice. Interacting with Computers, 23(6), 604–621.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., (Cyn) Liu, SY. (2019). Beautifying IoT: The Internet of Things as a Cultural Agenda. In: Soro, A., Brereton, M., Roe, P. (eds) Social Internet of Things. Internet of Things. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94659-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94659-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94657-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94659-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)