Skip to main content

Local Clock Offset and Drift Estimation Between Neighbor Wireless Sensor Nodes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1575 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10962))

Abstract

In wireless sensor networks, each sensor node observes events and records its attributes including its occurrence time. For precise analysis of the records, local clocks of all the wireless sensor nodes are required to be synchronized; however, due to their individual differences, each local clock has its own drift and offset. Hence, estimation of relative offsets and drifts among the wireless sensor nodes are mandatory. Conventionally, an offset and a drift between neighbor wireless sensor nodes are estimated by exchanges of some control messages. Since transmission delay of these control messages are not predictable due to the mechanism for collision avoidance in wireless LAN protocols, the provided precision of the offset and drift is not acceptable for various sensor network applications. In order to solve this problem, this paper proposes a novel method for estimation of the offset and drift between neighbor wireless sensor nodes based on their event observation. Since events observed both of the neighbor wireless sensor nodes should be recorded with the same occurrence time, the offset and drift are estimated by using differences between the recorded occurrence times. However, it is impossible for the wireless sensor nodes to identify which events are commonly observed. Hence, this paper proposes a novel heuristical method for estimation of commonly observed events between the neighbor wireless sensor nodes by using their sequences of recorded event occurrence times. Here, all possible pairs of an offset and a drift are evaluated by numbers of induced commonly observed events. Results of simulation experiments show that records of event occurrence times expected to include more than three commonly observed events realizes estimation of commonly observed events more precise than 99%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    If various kinds of events are observed and identified by wireless sensor nodes, more precise estimation of commonly observed events is realized.

  2. 2.

    Events occur according to Poisson arrivals.

References

  1. Cristian, F.: Progabilistic clock synchronization. Distrib. Comput. 3(3), 146–158 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jeremy, E., Lewis, G., Deborah, E.: Fine-grained network time synchronization using reference broadcasts. In: Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, pp. 147–163 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kopetz, H., Ochsenreiter, W.: Clock synchronization in distributed real-time systems. ICE Trans. Comput. C–36(8), 933–940 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Miklos, M., Branislav, K., Kayla, S.: The flooding time synchronization protocol. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 39–49 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Qu, Y., Georgakopoulos, S.V.: A distributed area coverage algorithm for maintenance of randomly distributed sensors with adjustable sensing range. In: ICE Global Communications Conference, pp. 286–291 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saurabh, G., Ram, K., Mani, B.S.: Timing-sync protocol for sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 138–149 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schick, L., de Souza, W.L., do Prado, A.F.: Wireless body sensor network for monitoring and evaluating physical activity. In: Latifi, S. (ed.) Information Technology - New Generations. AISC, vol. 558, pp. 81–86. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54978-1_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Tanenbaum, A.S., Steen, M.: Distributed Systems Principles and Paradigms. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Tuba, E., Tuba, M., Simian, D.: Wireless sensor network coverage problem using modified fireworks algorithm. In: Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference, pp. 696–701 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wu, Y.-C., Chaudhari, Q., Serpedin, E.: Clock synchronization of wireless sensor networks. ICE Sig. Process. Mag. 28(1), 124–138 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroaki Higaki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Arao, A., Higaki, H. (2018). Local Clock Offset and Drift Estimation Between Neighbor Wireless Sensor Nodes. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2018. ICCSA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10962. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95168-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95168-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95167-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95168-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics