Skip to main content

Automated Monitoring of Collaborative Working Environments for Supporting Open Innovation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 877))

Abstract

Open Innovation is a complex procedure that requires effective management and control along the different stages of the overall process. The automated monitoring of Open Innovation is the aim of a collaborative working environment designed, developed and tested in our research labs. This paper illustrates our solution and provides an assessment of the monitoring capabilities implemented. In particular, we propose a data model with a general approach for defining metrics and a list of metrics enabling automated monitoring with an evaluation of their informative power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is possible to have more than one optional attributes.

  2. 2.

    Grouping operators partition events in the Event Log, based on their values among specified attributes. They function like a GROUP BY clause in SQL.

  3. 3.

    Aggregating functions summary or aggregate the values recorded by events included in a group. The typical aggregating functions implemented in SQL are SUM, COUNT, AVERAGE, MAXIMUM and MINIMUM.

  4. 4.

    A GitHub repository including all the data about the PCA performed is available at https://github.com/muneebkiani/IF.

References

  1. Anaya, A.R., Boticario, J.G.: Application of machine learning techniques to analyse student interactions and improve the collaboration process. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(2), 1171–1181 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andriessen, J.E.: Working with Groupware: Understanding and Evaluating Collaboration Technology. Springer, London (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0067-6

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellandi, V., Ceravolo, P., Damiani, E., Frati, F., Maggesi, J., Zhu, L.: Exploiting participatory design in open innovation factories. In: 2012 Eighth International Conference on Signal Image Technology and Internet Based Systems (SITIS), pp. 937–943. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bellini, E., Ceravolo, P., Nesi, P.: Quantify resilience enhancement of uts through exploiting connected community and internet of everything emerging technologies. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. (TOIT) 18(1), 7 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blohm, I., Bretschneider, U., Leimeister, J.M., Krcmar, H.: Does collaboration among participants lead to better ideas in IT-based idea competitions? An empirical investigation. Int. J. Netw. Virtual Org. 9(2), 106–122 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ceravolo, P., et al.: Innovation factory: an innovative collaboration and management scenario. In: Glitho, R., Zennaro, M., Belqasmi, F., Agueh, M. (eds.) AFRICOMM 2015. LNICST, vol. 171, pp. 99–105. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43696-8_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Ceravolo, P., Zavatarelli, F.: Knowledge acquisition in process intelligence. In: 2015 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Research (ICTRC), pp. 218–221. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chesbrough, H.: Managing open innovation. Res.-Technol. Manag. 47(1), 23–26 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Damiani, E., Ceravolo, P., Frati, F., Bellandi, V., Maier, R., Seeber, I., Waldhart, G.: Applying recommender systems in collaboration environments. Comput. Hum. Behav. 51, 1124–1133 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Diamantini, C., Potena, D., Storti, E.: Data mart reconciliation in virtual innovation factories. In: Iliadis, L., Papazoglou, M., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2014. LNBIP, vol. 178, pp. 274–285. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07869-4_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Fiore, S.M., Rosen, M.A., Smith-Jentsch, K., Salas, E., Letsky, M., Warner, N.: Toward an understanding of macrocognition in teams: predicting processes in complex collaborative contexts. Hum. Fact.: J. Hum. Fact. Ergon. Soc. 52, 203–224 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Franz, T.M.: Group Dynamics and Team Interventions: Understanding and Improving Team Performance. Wiley, Hoboken (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huizingh, E.K.: Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives. Technovation 31(1), 2–9 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim, S.K.: Explicit design of innovation performance metrics by using analytic hierarchy process expansion. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R.: Different modes of open innovation: a theoretical framework and an empirical study. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 13(04), 615–636 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lichtenthaler, U.: Outbound open innovation and its effect on firm performance: examining environmental influences. R&D Manag. 39(4), 317–330 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00561.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mathieu, J., Maynard, M.T., Rapp, T., Gilson, L.: Team effectiveness 1997–2007: a review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J. Manag. 34(3), 410–476 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Oman, S.K., Tumer, I.Y., Wood, K., Seepersad, C.: A comparison of creativity and innovation metrics and sample validation through in-class design projects. Res. Eng. Des. 24(1), 65–92 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Patel, H., Pettitt, M., Wilson, J.R.: Factors of collaborative working: a framework for a collaboration model. Appl. Ergon. 43(1), 1–26 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rittgen, P.: Negotiating models. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 561–573. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72988-4_39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Seeber, I., Maier, R., Waldhart, G., Bellandi, V., Ceravolo, P., Damiani, E., Frati, F., Hrastnik, J.: Computer-supported collaboration environments and the emergence of collaboration aspects. In: “The Changing Nature of Work: Working Smarter with ICT”, Pre-ICIS2013 OSRA Workshop (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Seeber, I., Maier, R., Ceravolo, P., Frati, F.: Tracing the development of ideas in distributed, IT-supported teams during synchronous collaboration (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stahl, G.: Group-cognition factors in socio-technical systems. Hum. Fact.: J. Hum. Fact. Ergon. Soc. (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Ceravolo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kiani, M.M., Ceravolo, P., Azzini, A., Damiani, E. (2018). Automated Monitoring of Collaborative Working Environments for Supporting Open Innovation. In: Uden, L., Hadzima, B., Ting, IH. (eds) Knowledge Management in Organizations. KMO 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 877. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95204-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95204-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95203-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95204-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics