Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Studies in Conversational UX Design pp 33–57Cite as

Safety First: Conversational Agents for Health Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Human–Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

Abstract

Automated dialogue systems represent a promising approach for health care promotion, thanks to their ability to emulate the experience of face-to-face interactions between health providers and patients and the growing ubiquity of home-based and mobile conversational assistants such as Apple’s Siri and Amazon’s Alexa. However, patient-facing conversational interfaces also have the potential to cause significant harm if they are not properly designed. In this chapter, we first review work on patient-facing conversational interfaces in healthcare, focusing on systems that use embodied conversational agents as their user interface modality. We then systematically review the kinds of errors that can occur if these interfaces are not properly constrained and the kinds of safety issues these can cause. We close by outlining design recommendations for avoiding these issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bandura A (1998) Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology and health 13(4):623–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battaglino C, Bickmore T W (2015) Increasing the engagement of conversational agents through co-constructed storytelling. 8th Workshop on Intelligent Narrative Technologies

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzi I (2002) Modelling out-of-vocabulary words for robust speech recognition. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensing J (2000) Bridging the gap: The separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine. Patient education and counseling 39(1):17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benzeghiba M, De Mori R, Deroo O, Dupont S, Erbes T, Jouvet D (2007) Automatic speech recognition and speech variability: A review. Speech communication 49(10):763–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickmore T, Giorgino T (2006) Health Dialog Systems for Patients and Consumers. J Biomedical Informatics 39(5):556–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickmore TW, Schulman D (2009) A virtual laboratory for studying long-term relationships between humans and virtual agents. (Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickmore T, Pfeifer L, Jack BW (2009a) Taking the time to care: empowering low health literacy hospital patients with virtual nurse agents (Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), Boston, MA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickmore TW, Schulman D, Yin L (2009b) Engagement vs deceit: Virtual humans with human autobiographies. 2009 International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 6–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickmore T, Pfeifer L, Byron D, Forsythe S, Henault L, Jack B (2010a) Usability of Conversational Agents by Patients with Inadequate Health Literacy: Evidence from Two Clinical Trials. Journal of Health Communication 15(Suppl 2):197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickmore T, Puskar K, Schlenk E, Pfeifer L, Sereika S (2010b) Maintaining Reality: Relational Agents for Antipsychotic Medication Adherence. Interacting with Computers 22:276–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickmore T, Silliman R, Nelson K, Cheng D, Winter M, Henaulat L (2013) A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Automated Exercise Coach for Older Adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 61:1676–1683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickmore T, Utami D, Matsuyama R, Paasche-Orlow M (2016) Improving Access to Online Health Information with Conversational Agents: A Randomized Controlled Experiment. Journal of Medical Internet Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlin P, Bos J, Larsson S, Lewin I, Mathesin C, Milward D (1999) Survey of existing interactive systems [Deliverable D1.3, TRINDI Project]

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohus D, Rudnicky AI (2005) Sorry, I didn’t catch that!-An investigation of non-speaking errors and recovery strategies. In: 6th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue

    Google Scholar 

  • Caines A, Buttery P (2014) The effect of disfluencies and learner errors on the parsing of spoken learner language. First Joint Workshop on Statistical Parsing of Morphologically Rich Languages and Syntactic Analysis of Non-Canonical Languages. Dublin, Ireland, pp. 74–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell J, Thorisson KR (1999) The power of a nod and a glance: Envelope vs. emotional feedback in animated conversational agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence 13(4–5):519–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Tan T, Liu X, Lanchantin P, Wan M, Gales MJ (2015) Recurrent neural network language model adaptation for multi-genre broadcast speech recognition. In: Sixteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark HH (1996) Using Language. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Corkrey R, Parkinson L (2002) Interactive voice response: review of studies 1989-2000. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 34(3):342–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff F (1997) Time. Ann Intern Med 127:483–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delichatsios HK, Friedman R, Glanz K, Tennstedt S, Smigelski C, Pinto B (2001) Randomized Trial of a “Talking Computer” to Improve Adults’ Eating Habits. American Journal of Health Promotion 15(4):215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVault D, Sagae K, Traum D (2009) Can I finish?: learning when to respond to incremental interpretation results in interactive dialogue. In: Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2009 Conference: The 10th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 11-20

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranti A, Goodwin C (1992) Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Farzanfar R, Locke S, Vachon L, Charbonneau A, Friedman R (2003) Computer telephony to improve adherence to antidepressants and clinical visits. Ann Behav Med Annual Meeting Supplement. p. S161

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher WM (1986) The DARPA speech recognition research database: specifications and status. In: Proc. DARPA Workshop Speech Recognition, Feb. 1986. pp. 93-99

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman R (1998) Automated telephone conversations to asses health behavior and deliver behavioral interventions. Journal of Medical Systems 22:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii Y, Yamamoto K, Nakagawa S (2012) Improving the Readability of ASR Results for Lectures Using Multiple Hypotheses and Sentence-Level Knowledge. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems 95(4):1101–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey JJ, Holliman EC, McDaniel J (1992) SWITCHBOARD: Telephone speech corpus for research and development. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP-92)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldwater S, Jurafsky D, Manning CD (2010) Which words are hard to recognize? Prosodic, lexical, and disfluency factors that increase speech recognition error rates. Speech Communication 52(3):181–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Google Speech Recognition. https://cloud.google.com/speech/. Accessed 9/30/2017

  • Goss FR, Zhou L, Weiner SG (2016) Incidence of speech recognition errors in the emergency department. International journal of medical informatics 93:70–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover AS, Plauché M, Barnard E, Kuun C (2009) HIV health information access using spoken dialogue systems: Touchtone vs. speech. In: 2009 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumperz J (1977) Sociocultural Knowledge in Conversational Inference. In: Saville-Troike M (ed) Linguistics and Anthroplogy. Georgetown University Press, Washington DC, pp 191–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins RP, Kreuter M, Resnicow K, Fishbein M, Dijkstra A (2008) Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Educ. Res. 23(3):454–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes-Roth B, Amano K, Saker R, Sephton T (2004) Training brief intervention with a virtual coach and virtual patients. Annual review of CyberTherapy and telemedicine 2:85–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson M, Matheson C, Oberlander J (2012) Recovering from Non-Understanding Errors in a Conversational Dialogue System. In: The 16th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton G, Deng L, Yu D, Dahl GE, Mohamed A, Jaitly N (2012) Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition: The shared views of four research groups. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 29(6):82–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschberg J, Litman D, Swerts M (2004) Prosodic and other cues to speech recognition failures. Speech Communication 43(1):155–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst G, McRoy S, Heeman P, Edmonds P, Horton D (1994) Repairing conversational misunderstandings and non-understandings. Speech Communication 15(3–4):213–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson T, Coiera E (2015) Risks and benefits of speech recognition for clinical documentation: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 23(e1):e169–e179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath A, Del Re A, Flückiger C, Symonds D (2011) Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy 48(1):9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huggins-Daines D, Kumar M, Chan A, Black A, Ravishankar M, Rudnicky A (2006) Pocketsphinx: A free, real-time continuous speech recognition system for hand-held devices. In: EEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM Watson Speech to Text. https://www.ibm.com/watson/services/speech-to-text/. Accessed 9/30/2017

  • The ISMP’s List of Confused Drug Names. Institute for Safe Medication Practices. http://ismp.org/Tools/Confused-Drug-Names.aspx. Accessed 9/30/2017

  • Juang B-H, Rabiner LR (2004) Automatic speech recognition–a brief history of the technology development

    Google Scholar 

  • Juang B, Rabiner L (2005) Automatic speech recognition–a brief history of the technology in Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy CM, Powell J, Payne TH, Ainsworth J, Boyd A, Bunchan I (2012) Active assistance technology for health-related behavior change: an interdisciplinary review. Journal of medical Internet research 14(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimani K, Bickmore T, Trinh H, Ring L, Paasche-Orlow M, Magnani J (2016) A Smartphone-based Virtual Agent for Atrial Fibrillation Education and Counseling. In: International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA)

    Google Scholar 

  • King A, Bickmore T, Campero M, Pruitt L, Yin L (2013) Employing ‘Virtual Advisors’ in Preventive Care for Underserved Communities: Results from the COMPASS Study. Journal of Health Communication 18(12):1449–1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch I, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L, Kolstad A (1993) Adult Literacy in America: A First Look at the Results of the National Adult Literacy Survey. National Center for Education Statistics, US Dept of Education, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Surdeanu M, Jurafsky D (2017) A scaffolding approach to coreference resolution integrating statistical and rule-based models. Natural Language Engineering 23(5):733–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson S (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Deng L, Gong Y, Haeb-Umbach R (2014) An overview of noise-robust automatic speech recognition. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 22(4):745–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Sarikaya R, Zhao L, Ni Y, pan Y-C (2016) Personalized natural language understanding. In: Proceedings Interspeech. pp. 1146-1150

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangu L, Brill E, Stolcke A (2000) Finding consensus in speech recognition: word error minimization and other applications of confusion networks. Computer Speech & Language 14(4):373–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin DJ, Garske JP, Davis MK (2000) Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 68(3):438–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medicine Io (2000) To Err is Human, Building a Safety Health System

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesnil G, Dauphin Y, Yao K, Bengio Y, Deng L, Hakkani-Tur D (2015) Using recurrent neural networks for slot filling in spoken language understanding. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing (TASLP) 23(3):530-539

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller WR, Rollnick S. (2012) Motivational interviewing: Helping people change. Guilford Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner AS, Milstein A, Hancock JT (2017) Talking to machines about personal mental health problems. JAMA

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner AS, Milstein A, Schueller S, Hegde R, Mangurian C, Linos E (2016) Smartphone-based conversational agents and responses to questions about mental health, interpersonal violence, and physical health. JAMA internal medicine 176(5):619–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman DA (1983) Some observations on mental models. Mental models 7(112):7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Paek T (2007) Toward Evaluation that Leads to Best Practices: Reconciling Dialogue Evaluation in Research and Industry. In: Workshop on Bridging the Gap: Academic and Industrial Research in Dialog Technologies

    Google Scholar 

  • Paetzel M, Manuvinakurike RR, DeVault D (2015) “So, which one is it?” The effect of alternative incremental architectures in a high-performance game-playing agent. In: SIGDIAL Conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Piette J (2000) Interactive voice response systems in the diagnosis and management of chronic disease. Am J Manag Care 6(7):817–827

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto B, Friedman R, Marcus B, Kelley H, Tennstedt S, Gillman M (2002) Effects of a Computer-Based, Telephone-Counseling System on Physical Activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 23(2):113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack ME, Brown L, Colbry D, McCarthy CE, Orosz C, Peintner B (2003) Autominder: An Intelligent Cognitive Orthotic System for People with Memory Impairment. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 44:273–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Povey D, Ghoshal A, Boulianne G, Burget L, Glembek O, Goel N (2011) The Kaldi speech recognition toolkit. In: IEEE 2011 workshop on automatic speech recognition and understanding

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabiner LR, Juang B-H (1993) Fundamentals of speech recognition

    Google Scholar 

  • Radziwill NM, Benton MC (2017) Evaluating Quality of Chatbots and Intelligent Conversational Agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04579

  • Ramelson H, Friedman R, Ockene J (1999) An automated telephone-based smoking cessation education and counseling system. Patient Education and Counseling 36:131–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren J, Bickmore TW, Hempstead M, Jack B (2014) Birth control, drug abuse, or domestic violence: what health risk topics are women willing to discuss with a virtual agent? In: 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich C, Sidner C, Lesh N, Garland A, Booth S, Chimani M (2004) DiamondHelp: A Graphical User Interface Framework for Human-Computer Collaboration. In: IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryu S, Lee D, Lee GG, Kim K, Noh H (2014) Exploiting out-of-vocabulary words for out-of-domain detection in dialog systems. In: 2014 International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing. IEEE, pp. 165-168

    Google Scholar 

  • Saon G, Kurata G, Sercu T, Audhkhasi K, Thomas S, Dimitriadis D, et al (2017) English conversational telephone speech recognition by humans and machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.02136

  • Sarikaya R (2017) The technology behind personal digital assistants: An overview of the system architecture and key components. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 34(1):67–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman B (1995) Looking for the bright side of user interface agents. interactions 2(1):13-15

    Google Scholar 

  • Skantze G (2007) Skantze, Gabriel. Error Handling in Spoken Dialogue Systems-Managing Uncertainty, Grounding and Miscommunication

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarbez R, Kotranza A, Brooks FP, Lok B, Whitton MC (2011) An initial exploration of conversational errors as a novel method for evaluating virtual human experiences. In: Virtual Reality Conference (VR)

    Google Scholar 

  • Svennevig J. (2000) Getting acquainted in conversation: a study of initial interactions. John Benjamins Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamura-Lis W (2013) Teach-back for quality education and patient safety. Urologic Nursing 33(6):267

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen D (ed) (1993) Framing in Discourse. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Maat M, Heylen D 5773 (2009) Turn management or impression management? In: International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomko S, Harris T, Toth A, Sanders J, Rudnicky A, Rosenfeld R (2005) Towards efficient human machin speech communication: The speech graffiti project. ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing 2(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tür G, Deoras A, Hakkani-Tür D (2013) Semantic parsing using word confusion networks with conditional random fields. In: Proceedings INTERSPEECH

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk TA (2007) Comments on context and conversation. Discourse and contemporary social change 54:281

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker M, Litman D, Kamm C, Abella A (1998) PARADISE: A Framework for Evaluating Spoken Dialogue Agents. In: Maybury MT, Wahlster W (eds) Readings in Intelligent User Interfaces. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, San Francisco, CA, pp 631–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Walraven CV, Oake N, Jennings A, Forster AJ (2010) The association between continuity of care and outcomes: a systematic and critical review. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 16(5):947–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Schultz T, Waibel A (2003) Comparison of acoustic model adaptation techniques on non-native speech. In: Proceedings Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodland PC, Odell JJ, Valtchev V, Young SJ (1994) Large vocabulary continuous speech recognition using HTK. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP-94)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong W, Droppo J, Huang X, Seide F, Seltzer M, Stolcke A (2017) The Microsoft 2016 conversational speech recognition system. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa M, Shindo H, Matsumoto Y (2016) Joint Transition-based Dependency Parsing and Disfluency Detection for Automatic Speech Recognition Texts. In: EMNLP

    Google Scholar 

  • Young M, Sparrow D, Gottlieb D, Selim A, Friedman R (2001) A telephone-linked computer system for COPD care. Chest 119:1565–1575

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Computer and Information Science, Northeastern University, Boston, USA

    Timothy Bickmore, Ha Trinh, Reza Asadi & Stefan Olafsson

Authors
  1. Timothy Bickmore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ha Trinh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Reza Asadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stefan Olafsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy Bickmore .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. IBM Research-Almaden, San Jose, CA, USA

    Robert J. Moore

  2. IBM Research-Almaden, San Jose, CA, USA

    Margaret H. Szymanski

  3. IBM Research-Almaden, San Jose, CA, USA

    Raphael Arar

  4. IBM Research-Almaden, San Jose, CA, USA

    Guang-Jie Ren

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bickmore, T., Trinh, H., Asadi, R., Olafsson, S. (2018). Safety First: Conversational Agents for Health Care. In: Moore, R., Szymanski, M., Arar, R., Ren, GJ. (eds) Studies in Conversational UX Design. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95579-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95579-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95578-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95579-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation