Skip to main content

Experts’ Familiarity Versus Optimality of Visualization Design: How Familiarity Affects Perceived and Objective Task Performance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Visualization techniques are gaining increasing prominence across domains as a principal medium for sharing and communicating experts’ insights. A heuristic used by domain experts while choosing or designing a visualization is often their prior familiarity with an encoding choice or a visual representation. However, familiar visualizations and encodings within a domain are often in conflict with the optimality of visualization design, in terms of how well they support the data analysis or communication tasks. The use of the familiarity heuristic leads to a perceived cognitive ease in processing familiar representations of information and causes scientists to undermine the effect of visualization best practices. Recent studies have shown that this bias often results in a discrepancy between scientists’ perceived and actual performance quality. It has also been shown that in some cases, participatory design sessions and qualitative and quantitative user studies are able to mitigate the effects of such bias. In this chapter, we discuss the potential causes and effects of familiarity related biases with examples from recent studies and reflect on the associated research questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allen TT (2005) Introduction to engineering statistics and six sigma: statistical quality control and design of experiments and systems. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ashcraft M (2006) Cognition

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brehmer M, Ng J, Tate K, Munzner T (2016) Matches, mismatches, and methods: multiple-view workflows for energy portfolio analysis. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics 22(1):449–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dasgupta A, Poco J, Wei Y, Cook R, Bertini E, Silva CT (2015) Bridging theory with practice: an exploratory study of visualization use and design for climate model comparison. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics 21(9):996–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dasgupta A, Burrows S, Han K, Rasch PJ (2017a) Empirical analysis of the subjective impressions and objective measures of domain scientists’ visual analytic judgments. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 1193–1204

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dasgupta A, Lee JY, Wilson R, Lafrance RA, Cramer N, Cook K, Payne S (2017b) Familiarity versus trust: a comparative study of domain scientists’ trust in visual analytics and conventional analysis methods. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics 23(1):271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dasgupta A, Poco J, Rogowitz B, Bertini E, Silva CT (2018) The effect of color scales on climate scientists objective and subjective performance in spatial data analysis tasks. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics (in publication)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13:319–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gist ME, Mitchell TR (1992) Self-efficacy: a theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Acad Manage Rev 17(2):183–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gleckler PJ, Taylor KE, Doutriaux C (2008) Performance metrics for climate models. J Geophys Res: Atmos 113(D6):D06104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gulati R (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? the implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad Manage J 38(1):85–112

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pandey AV, Manivannan A, Nov O, Satterthwaite M, Bertini E (2014) The persuasive power of data visualization. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics 20(12):2211–2220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Park CW, Lessig VP (1981) Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristics. J Consum Res 8(2):223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Plaisant C (2004) The challenge of information visualization evaluation. In: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces. ACM, New York, pp 109–116

    Google Scholar 

  15. Raskin J (1994) Intuitive equals familiar. Commun ACM 37(9):17–19

    Google Scholar 

  16. Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. J Risk Uncertainty 1(1):7–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stajkovic AD, Luthans F (1998) Self-efficacy and work-related performance: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 124(2):240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Takayama L, Kandogan E (2006) Trust as an underlying factor of system administrator interface choice. In: Extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 1391–1396

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1973) Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cogn Psychol 5(2):207–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. Q J Econ 106(4):1039–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aritra Dasgupta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dasgupta, A. (2018). Experts’ Familiarity Versus Optimality of Visualization Design: How Familiarity Affects Perceived and Objective Task Performance. In: Ellis, G. (eds) Cognitive Biases in Visualizations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95831-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95831-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95830-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95831-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics