Skip to main content

Humans Construct Survey Estimates on the Fly from a Compartmentalised Representation of the Navigated Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Spatial Cognition XI (Spatial Cognition 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11034))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Despite its relevance for navigation surprisingly little is known about how goal direction bearings to distant locations are computed. Behavioural and neuroscientific models proposing the path integration of previously navigated routes are supported indirectly by neural data, but behavioral evidence is lacking. We show that humans integrate navigated routes post-hoc and incrementally while conducting goal direction estimates. Participants learned a multi-corridor layout by walking through a virtual environment. Throughout learning, participants repeatedly performed pairwise pointing from the start location, end location, and each turn location between segments. Pointing latency increased with the number of corridors to the target and decreased with pointing experience rather than environmental familiarity. Bimodal pointing distributions indicate that participants made systematic errors, for example, mixing up turns or forgetting segments. Modeling these error sources suggests that pointing did not rely on one unified, but rather multiple representations of the experimental environment. We conclude that participants performed incremental on-the-fly calculations of goal direction estimates within compartmentalised representations, which was quicker for nearby goals and became faster with repeated pointing. Within navigated environments humans do not compute difference vectors from coordinates of a globally consistent integrated “map in the head”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Poucet, B.: Spatial cognitive maps in animals: new hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms. Psychol. Rev. 100, 163–182 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, R.F.: Building a cognitive map by assembling multiple path integration systems. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 23, 692–702 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Byrne, P., Becker, S., Burgess, N.: Remembering the past and imagining the future: a neural model of spatial memory and imagery. Psychol. Rev. 114, 340–375 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McNaughton, B.L., Battaglia, F.P., Jensen, O., Moser, E.I., Moser, M.B.: Path integration and the neural basis of the “cognitive map”. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 663–678 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanders, H., Rennó-Costa, C., Idiart, M., Lisman, J.E.: Grid cells and place cells: an integrated view of their navigational/memory function. Trends Neurosci. 38, 1–13 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pfeiffer, B.E., Foster, D.J.: Hippocampal place-cell sequences depict future paths to remembered goals. Nature 497, 74–79 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Morgan, L.K., Macevoy, S.P., Aguirre, G.K., Epstein, R.A.: Distances between real-world locations are represented in the human hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 31, 1238–1245 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Howard, L.R., Javadi, A.H., Yu, Y., Mill, R.D., Morrison, L.C., Knight, R., Loftus, M.M., Staskute, L., Spiers, H.J.: The hippocampus and entorhinal cortex encode the path and euclidean distances to goals during navigation. Curr. Biol. 24, 1331–1340 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Meilinger, T.: The network of reference frames theory: a synthesis of graphs and cognitive maps. In: Freksa, C., Newcombe, N.S., Gärdenfors, P., Wölfl, S. (eds.) Spatial Cognition 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5248, pp. 344–360. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87601-4_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Zar, J.H.: Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thorndyke, P.W., Hayes-Roth, B.: Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cogn. Psychol. 14, 560–589 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheung, A., Ball, D., Milford, M., Wyeth, G., Wiles, J.: Maintaining a cognitive map in darkness: the need to fuse boundary knowledge with path integration. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002651 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tse, D., Langston, R.F., Kakeyama, M., Bethus, I., Spooner, P.A., Wood, E.R., Witter, M.P., Morris, R.G.M.: Schemas and memory consolidation. Science 316, 76–82 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Janzen, G.: Memory for object location and route direction in virtual large-scale space. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 59, 493–508 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stern, E., Leiser, D.: Levels of spatial knowledge and urban travel modeling. Geogr. Anal. 20, 140–155 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Muller, R.U., Bostock, E., Taube, J.S., Kubie, J.L.: On the directional firing properties of hippocampal place cells. J. Neurosci. 14, 7235–7251 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Marchette, S.A., Ryan, J., Epstein, R.A.: Schematic representations of local environmental space guide goal-directed navigation. Cognition 158, 68–80 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Meilinger, T., Riecke, B.E., Bülthoff, H.H.: Local and global reference frames for environmental spaces. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 67, 542–569 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Meilinger, T., Strickrodt, M., Bülthoff, H.H.: Qualitative differences between environmental and vista space memory are caused by the separation of space, not by movement or successive perception. Cognition 155, 77–95 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bennett, A.T.: Do animals have cognitive maps? J. Exp. Biol. 199, 219–224 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grieves, R.M., Dudchenko, P.A.: Cognitive maps and spatial inference in animals: Rats fail to take a novel shortcut, but can take a previously experienced one. Learn. Motiv. 44, 81–92 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the DFG grant ME 3476/2-1. We would like to thank Joachim Tesch for help with the virtual environment setup.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Meilinger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Meilinger, T., Henson, A., Rebane, J., Bülthoff, H.H., Mallot, H.A. (2018). Humans Construct Survey Estimates on the Fly from a Compartmentalised Representation of the Navigated Environment. In: Creem-Regehr, S., Schöning, J., Klippel, A. (eds) Spatial Cognition XI. Spatial Cognition 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11034. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96385-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96385-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96384-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96385-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics