Skip to main content

How Are Robots’ Reasons for Action Grounded?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 44))

Abstract

This paper defends the view that (non-conscious) robots’ reasons for action can only be grounded externally, in the qualitative character of the conscious affective experience of their programmers or users. Within reasoning, reasons for action need to be evaluated in a way that provides immediate non-inferential justification of one’s reasons to oneself, in order to stop a potential regress of whys. Robots devoid of consciousness and thus incapable of feeling emotion cannot process information about reasons for action in a way that is subjectively meaningful. Different types of grounding will be discussed, together with the question of relativism about fundamentality in the context of grounding. The concluding discussion will consider the case of hypothetical conscious robots with internally grounded reasons for action, arguing that it would be unethical for such robots to be created, as they would either effectively be brought into slavery or, if developing AI rather than human-centred values, would potentially represent a threat to human life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Some of this information may take the form of an absence of unexpected change in aspects of our surrounding.

References

  • Balleine, B., Dickinson, A.: Consciousness—the interface between affect and cognition. In: Cornwell, J. (ed.) Consciousness and Human Identity, pp. 57–85. Oxford University Press, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Balleine, B., Garner, C., Dickinson, A.: Instrumental outcome devaluation is attenuated by the anti-emetic ondansetron. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 48B, 235–251 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chudnoff, E.: The nature of intuitive justification. Philos. Stud. 126(3), 347–373 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, A., Balleine, B.: Motivational control of goal-directed action. Anim. Learn. Behav. 22(1), 1–18 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, A., Balleine, B.: Hedonics: the cognitive-motivational interface. In: Kringelbach, M.L., Berridge, K.C. (eds.) Pleasures of the Brain, pp. 74–84. Oxford University Press, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, A., Balleine, B., Watt, A., Gonzalez, F., Boakes, R.A.: Motivational control after extended instrumental training. Anim. Learn. Behav. 23, 197–206 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutnik, L.A., Hakimzada, A.F., Yoskowitz, N.A., Patel, V.L.: The role of emotion in decision-making: a cognitive neuroeconomic approach towards understanding sexual risk behaviour. J. Biomed. Inf. 39(6), 720–736 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S.: The symbol grounding problem. Physica D42, 335–346 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S.: Grounding symbols in the analog world with neural nets. Think 2(1), 12–78 (1993). (Special issue on connectionism versus symbolism)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S.: Lunch Uncertain. Times Literary Suppl. 5664, 22–23 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G.: Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. MIT Press, Cambridge (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, B.: The regress-stopping role of affective valence. In: Proceedings of AISB Annual Convention, pp. 255–259 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R.: Minds, brains, and programs. Behav. Brain Sci. 3(3), 417–457 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shead, S.: Here’s why Microsoft’s teen chatbot turned into a genocidal racist, according to an AI expert. Business Insider (2016). http://uk.businessinsider.com/ai-expert-explains-why-microsofts-tay-chatbot-is-so-racist-2016-3. Accessed 31 Jan 2018

  • Smithies, D.: The phenomenal basis of epistemic justification. In: Sprevak, M., Kallestrup, J. (eds.) New Waves in Philosophy of Mind (2014). http://www.palgraveconnect.com/pc/doifinder/10.1057/9781137286734. Accessed 28 Nov 2014

  • Wellman, H.M., Woolley, J.D.: From simple desires to ordinary beliefs: the early development of everyday psychology. Cognition 35(3), 245–275 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryony Pierce .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pierce, B. (2018). How Are Robots’ Reasons for Action Grounded?. In: Müller, V. (eds) Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence 2017. PT-AI 2017. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 44. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96448-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96448-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96447-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96448-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics