Abstract
This paper defends the view that (non-conscious) robots’ reasons for action can only be grounded externally, in the qualitative character of the conscious affective experience of their programmers or users. Within reasoning, reasons for action need to be evaluated in a way that provides immediate non-inferential justification of one’s reasons to oneself, in order to stop a potential regress of whys. Robots devoid of consciousness and thus incapable of feeling emotion cannot process information about reasons for action in a way that is subjectively meaningful. Different types of grounding will be discussed, together with the question of relativism about fundamentality in the context of grounding. The concluding discussion will consider the case of hypothetical conscious robots with internally grounded reasons for action, arguing that it would be unethical for such robots to be created, as they would either effectively be brought into slavery or, if developing AI rather than human-centred values, would potentially represent a threat to human life.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Some of this information may take the form of an absence of unexpected change in aspects of our surrounding.
References
Balleine, B., Dickinson, A.: Consciousness—the interface between affect and cognition. In: Cornwell, J. (ed.) Consciousness and Human Identity, pp. 57–85. Oxford University Press, New York (1998)
Balleine, B., Garner, C., Dickinson, A.: Instrumental outcome devaluation is attenuated by the anti-emetic ondansetron. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 48B, 235–251 (1995)
Chudnoff, E.: The nature of intuitive justification. Philos. Stud. 126(3), 347–373 (2011)
Dickinson, A., Balleine, B.: Motivational control of goal-directed action. Anim. Learn. Behav. 22(1), 1–18 (1994)
Dickinson, A., Balleine, B.: Hedonics: the cognitive-motivational interface. In: Kringelbach, M.L., Berridge, K.C. (eds.) Pleasures of the Brain, pp. 74–84. Oxford University Press, New York (2010)
Dickinson, A., Balleine, B., Watt, A., Gonzalez, F., Boakes, R.A.: Motivational control after extended instrumental training. Anim. Learn. Behav. 23, 197–206 (1995)
Gutnik, L.A., Hakimzada, A.F., Yoskowitz, N.A., Patel, V.L.: The role of emotion in decision-making: a cognitive neuroeconomic approach towards understanding sexual risk behaviour. J. Biomed. Inf. 39(6), 720–736 (2006)
Harnad, S.: The symbol grounding problem. Physica D42, 335–346 (1990)
Harnad, S.: Grounding symbols in the analog world with neural nets. Think 2(1), 12–78 (1993). (Special issue on connectionism versus symbolism)
Harnad, S.: Lunch Uncertain. Times Literary Suppl. 5664, 22–23 (2011)
Millikan, R.G.: Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. MIT Press, Cambridge (1984)
Pierce, B.: The regress-stopping role of affective valence. In: Proceedings of AISB Annual Convention, pp. 255–259 (2017)
Searle, J.R.: Minds, brains, and programs. Behav. Brain Sci. 3(3), 417–457 (1980)
Shead, S.: Here’s why Microsoft’s teen chatbot turned into a genocidal racist, according to an AI expert. Business Insider (2016). http://uk.businessinsider.com/ai-expert-explains-why-microsofts-tay-chatbot-is-so-racist-2016-3. Accessed 31 Jan 2018
Smithies, D.: The phenomenal basis of epistemic justification. In: Sprevak, M., Kallestrup, J. (eds.) New Waves in Philosophy of Mind (2014). http://www.palgraveconnect.com/pc/doifinder/10.1057/9781137286734. Accessed 28 Nov 2014
Wellman, H.M., Woolley, J.D.: From simple desires to ordinary beliefs: the early development of everyday psychology. Cognition 35(3), 245–275 (1990)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pierce, B. (2018). How Are Robots’ Reasons for Action Grounded?. In: Müller, V. (eds) Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence 2017. PT-AI 2017. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 44. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96448-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96448-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96447-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96448-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)