Abstract
Bayesian networks are powerful tools for representing relations of dependence among variables of a domain under uncertainty. Over the last decades, applications of Bayesian networks have been developed for a wide variety of subject areas, in tasks such as learning, modeling, forecasting and decision-making. Out of hundreds of related papers found, we picked a sample of 150 to study the trends of such applications over a 16-year interval. We classified the publications according to their corresponding domain of application, and then analyzed the tendency to develop Bayesian networks in determined areas of research. We found a set of indicators that help better explain these tendencies: the levels of formalization, data accuracy and data accessibility of a domain, and the level of human intervention in the primary data. The results and methodology of the current study provide insight into potential areas of research and application of Bayesian networks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alsheikh-Ali, A.A., Qureshi, W., Al-Mallah, M.H., Ioannidis, J.P.A.: Public availability of published research data in high-impact journals. PLoS ONE 6(9), e24357 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024357
Chuang, S.H.: A resource-based perspective on knowledge management capability and competitive advantage: an empirical investigation. Expert Syst. Appl. 27(3), 459–465 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2004.05.008
Fenton, N., Neil, M., Lagnado, D.A.: A general structure for legal arguments about evidence using Bayesian networks. Cogn. Sci. 37(1), 61–102 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12004
Galley, M., McKeown, K., Hirschberg, J., Shriberg, E.: Identifying agreement and disagreement in conversational speech: Use of Bayesian networks to model pragmatic dependencies, pp. 669–676 (2004)
Greenspan, R.J.: Biological indeterminacy. Sci. Eng. Ethics 18(3), 447–452 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9379-2
Harzing, A., van der Wal, R.: Google scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics Sci. Environ. Polit. 8, 61–73 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00076
Xu, S.J., Nourinejad, M., Lai, X., Chow, Y. J.: Network learning via multiagent inverse transportation problems. Transp. Sci. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2017.0805
Kasper, G., Wagner, J.: Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Ann. Rev. Appl. Linguist. 34, 171–212 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000014
Katzner, D.W.: Unmeasured Information and the Methodology of Social Scientific Inquiry, 1st edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2001)
van Kerkhoff, L.: Integrated research: concepts of connection in environmental science and policy. Environ. Sci. Policy 8(5), 452–463 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2005.06.002
Kress, K.: Legal indeterminacy. Calif. Law Rev. 77(2), 283 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/3480606
McCarthy, J.: Generality in artificial intelligence. Commun. ACM 30(12), 1030–1035 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1145/33447.33448
Mkrtchyan, L., Podofillini, L., Dang, V.: Bayesian belief networks for human reliability analysis: a review of applications and gaps (2015)
Newton, A.C.: Bayesian Belief Networks in Environmental Modelling: A Review of Recent Progress, 1st edn, pp. 13–50. Nova Science Publishers, New York (2009)
Okutan, A., Yildiz, O.T.: Software defect prediction using Bayesian networks. Empir. Softw. Eng. 19(1), 154–181 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-012-9218-8
Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems, 1st edn. Kaufmann, San Mateo (1988)
Prakken, H.: A logical framework for modelling legal argument, pp. 1–9. ACM Press (1993)
Rubin, A., Riznichenko, G.Y.: Mathematical Biophysics, 1st edn. Springer, Boston (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8702-9
Russell, S.J., Norvig, P., Davis, E.: Artificial Intelligence, 1st edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2010)
Shackley, S., Wynne, B.: Representing uncertainty in global climate change science and policy: boundary-ordering devices and authority. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 21(3), 275–302 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399602100302
Xie, P., Li, J.H., Ou, X., Liu, P., Levy, R.: Using Bayesian networks for cyber security analysis, pp. 211–220. IEEE/IFIP (2010)
Acknowledgment
The research presented in this paper was supported by the RUDN University Program 5-100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Novikova, G.M., Azofeifa, E.J. (2018). Current Perspectives on the Application of Bayesian Networks in Different Domains. In: Lupeikiene, A., Vasilecas, O., Dzemyda, G. (eds) Databases and Information Systems. DB&IS 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 838. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97571-9_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97571-9_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97570-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97571-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)