Abstract
Today, to get optimal and effective solutions, firms go toward co-creation and crowdsourcing activities especially the virtual ones. The technological and e-marketing revolutions greatly explain the spread of those collaborative practices. Special interest of this study is on consumer perceptual and behavioral responses toward co-designed packaging in order to assess the worthiness of conducting an online co-design experience. For this reason, based on categorization and regulatory focus theories, we developed a research model to understand consumer’s perceptual and psychological effects on his responses toward co-designed packaging. A cross-cultural study through an online experiment brings to light unpredicted findings and new insights for co-design and consumer psychology literatures, as well as, for e-marketers and professionals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Avnet, T., Higgins, E.T.: How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions. J. Mark. Res. 43(1), 1–10 (2006)
Baas, M., De Dreu, C.K., Nijstad, B.A.: A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychol. Bull. 134(6), 779 (2008)
Baas, M., De Dreu, C.K., Nijstad, B.A.: When prevention promotes creativity: the role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 100(5), 794 (2011)
Becker, L., van Rompay, T.J., Schifferstein, H.N., Galetzka, M.: Tough package, strong taste: the influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations. Food Qual. Prefer. 22(1), 17–23 (2011)
Bless, H., Wänke, M.: Can the same information be typical and atypical? How perceived typicality moderates assimilation and contrast in evaluative judgments. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 26(3), 306–314 (2000)
Bloch, P.H.: Seeking the ideal form: product design and consumer response. J. Mark. 59, 16–29 (1995)
Boesen-Mariani, S., Gomez, P., Gavard-Perret, M.L.: Regulatory focus: a promising concept for marketing research. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) 25(1), 87–106 (2010)
Chaffey, D., Ellis-Chadwick, F., Isaac, H., Volle, P., Mercanti-Guérin, M.: Marketing Digital. Pearson, London (2014)
Chaffey, D., Smith, P.R., Smith, P.R.: eMarketing eXcellence: Planning and Optimizing Your Digital Marketing. Routledge, Abingdon (2013)
Crowe, E., Higgins, E.T.: Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: promotion and prevention in decision-making. Org. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 69(2), 117–132 (1997)
Deliya, M.M.M., Parmar, M.B.J.: Role of packaging on consumer buying behavior–Patan district. Glob. J. Manag. Bus. Res. 12(10) (2012)
Dennis, C., Merrilees, B., Jayawardhena, C., Tiu Wright, L.: E-consumer behaviour. Eur. J. Mark. 43(9/10), 1121–1139 (2009)
Franke, N., Schreier, M., Kaiser, U.: The “I designed it myself” effect in mass customization. Manag. Sci. 56(1), 125–140 (2010)
Friedman, R.S., Förster, J.: The influence of approach and avoidance motor actions on creative cognition. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38(1), 41–55 (2002)
Friedman, R.S., Förster, J.: The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81(6), 1001 (2001)
Gatautis, R., Vitkauskaite, E.: Crowdsourcing application in marketing activities. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 110, 1243–1250 (2014)
Harrison, T., Waite, K.: Impact of co-production on consumer perception of empowerment. Serv. Ind. J. 35(10), 502–520 (2015)
Hassenzahl, M., Schöbel, M., Trautmann, T.: How motivational orientation influences the evaluation and choice of hedonic and pragmatic interactive products: the role of regulatory focus. Interact. Comput. 20(4–5), 473–479 (2008)
Haws, K.L., Dholakia, U.M., Bearden, W.O.: An assessment of chronic regulatory focus measures. J. Mark. Res. 47(5), 967–982 (2010)
Hayes, A.F.: Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Publications, New York (2013)
Hayes, A.F.: Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: quantification, inference, and interpretation. Commun. Monogr. 85(1), 4–40 (2018)
Henderson, J.L.G., Cote, J.A.: Impression management using typeface design. J. Mark. 68, 60–72 (2004)
Herman, A., Reiter-Palmon, R.: The effect of regulatory focus on idea generation and idea evaluation. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 5(1), 13 (2011)
Higgins, E.T.: Beyond pleasure and pain. Am. Psychol. 52(12), 1280 (1997)
Higgins, E.T.: Making a good decision: value from fit. Am. Psychol. 55(11), 1217 (2000)
Kurman, J., Liem, G.A., Ivancovsky, T., Morio, H., Lee, J.: Regulatory focus as an explanatory variable for cross-cultural differences in achievement-related behavior. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 46(2), 171–190 (2015)
Labrecque, L.I., vor dem Esche, J., Mathwick, C., Novak, T.P., Hofacker, C.F.: Consumer power: evolution in the digital age. J. Interact. Mark. 27(4), 257–269 (2013)
Loken, B.: Consumer psychology: categorization, inferences, affect, and persuasion. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57, 453–485 (2006)
Loo, R.: A caveat on using single-item versus multiple-item scales. J. Manag. Psychol. 17(1), 68–75 (2002)
Luo, L., Kannan, P.K., Ratchford, B.T.: Incorporating subjective characteristics in product design and evaluations. J. Mark. Res. 45(2), 182–194 (2008)
Nishikawa, H., Schreier, M., Fuchs, C., Ogawa, S.: The value of marketing crowdsourced new products as such: evidence from two randomized field experiments. J. Mark. Res. 54(4), 525–539 (2017)
Ophuis, P.A.O., Van Trijp, H.C.: Perceived quality: a market driven and consumer oriented approach. Food Qual. Prefer. 6(3), 177–183 (1995)
Pham, M.T., Higgins, E.T.: The state of the art and theoretical propositions. In: Inside Consumption: Consumer Motives, Goals, and Desires, vol. 8 (2005)
Pham, M.T., Avnet, T.: Contingent reliance on the affect heuristic as a function of regulatory focus. Org. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 108(2), 267–278 (2009)
Pula, K., Parks, C.D., Ross, C.F.: Regulatory focus and food choice motives. Prevention orientation associated with mood, convenience, and familiarity. Appetite 78, 15–22 (2014)
Rettie, R., Brewer, C.: The verbal and visual components of package design. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 9(1), 56–70 (2000)
Roest, H., Rindfleisch, A.: The influence of quality cues and typicality cues on restaurant purchase intention. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 17(1), 10–18 (2010)
Schoormans, J.P., Robben, H.S.: The effect of new package design on product attention, categorization and evaluation. J. Econ. Psychol. 18(2), 271–287 (1997)
Semin, G.R., Higgins, T., de Montes, L.G., Estourget, Y., Valencia, J.F.: Linguistic signatures of regulatory focus: how abstraction fits promotion more than prevention. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 89(1), 36 (2005)
Silayoi, P., Speece, M.: Packaging and purchase decisions: an exploratory study on the impact of involvement level and time pressure. Br. Food J. 106(8), 607–628 (2004)
Wang Edward, S.T.: The influence of visual packaging design on perceived food product quality, value, and brand preference. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 41(10), 805–816 (2013)
Sweeney, J.C., Soutar, G.N.: Consumer perceived value: the development of a multiple item scale. J. Retail. 77(2), 203–220 (2001)
Van-Dijk, D., Kluger, A.N.: Feedback sign effect on motivation: is it moderated by regulatory focus? Appl. Psychol. 53(1), 113–135 (2004)
Veryzer Jr., R.W., Hutchinson, J.W.: The influence of unity and prototypicality on aesthetic responses to new product designs. J. Consum. Res. 24(4), 374–394 (1998)
Werth, L., Foerster, J.: How regulatory focus influences consumer behavior. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 37(1), 33–51 (2007)
Werle, C.O.C., Boesen-Mariani, S., Gavard-Perret, M.L., Berthaud, S.: Preventing youth obesity: the efficacy of the social risk argument on eating intentions and behaviors. Recherche et Application en Marketing (English Edition) 27(3), 3–27 (2012)
Westerman, S.J., et al.: The design of consumer packaging: effects of manipulations of shape, orientation, and alignment of graphical forms on consumers’ assessments. Food Qual. Prefer. 27(1), 8–17 (2013)
Zeithaml, V.A.: Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Mark. 52, 2–22 (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Annex 1: Stimulus
Annex 2: Process Macro’s Results
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ammar, O., Garbout, S., Trigui, I.T. (2018). Co-design and Chronic Regulatory Focus: A Cross-cultural Study and Suggestions for Future e-Marketing Practices. In: Bach Tobji, M., Jallouli, R., Koubaa, Y., Nijholt, A. (eds) Digital Economy. Emerging Technologies and Business Innovation. ICDEc 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 325. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97749-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97749-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97748-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97749-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)