Skip to main content

Co-design and Chronic Regulatory Focus: A Cross-cultural Study and Suggestions for Future e-Marketing Practices

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Economy. Emerging Technologies and Business Innovation (ICDEc 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 325))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Today, to get optimal and effective solutions, firms go toward co-creation and crowdsourcing activities especially the virtual ones. The technological and e-marketing revolutions greatly explain the spread of those collaborative practices. Special interest of this study is on consumer perceptual and behavioral responses toward co-designed packaging in order to assess the worthiness of conducting an online co-design experience. For this reason, based on categorization and regulatory focus theories, we developed a research model to understand consumer’s perceptual and psychological effects on his responses toward co-designed packaging. A cross-cultural study through an online experiment brings to light unpredicted findings and new insights for co-design and consumer psychology literatures, as well as, for e-marketers and professionals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Avnet, T., Higgins, E.T.: How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions. J. Mark. Res. 43(1), 1–10 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baas, M., De Dreu, C.K., Nijstad, B.A.: A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychol. Bull. 134(6), 779 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baas, M., De Dreu, C.K., Nijstad, B.A.: When prevention promotes creativity: the role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 100(5), 794 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, L., van Rompay, T.J., Schifferstein, H.N., Galetzka, M.: Tough package, strong taste: the influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations. Food Qual. Prefer. 22(1), 17–23 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bless, H., Wänke, M.: Can the same information be typical and atypical? How perceived typicality moderates assimilation and contrast in evaluative judgments. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 26(3), 306–314 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, P.H.: Seeking the ideal form: product design and consumer response. J. Mark. 59, 16–29 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boesen-Mariani, S., Gomez, P., Gavard-Perret, M.L.: Regulatory focus: a promising concept for marketing research. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) 25(1), 87–106 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffey, D., Ellis-Chadwick, F., Isaac, H., Volle, P., Mercanti-Guérin, M.: Marketing Digital. Pearson, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffey, D., Smith, P.R., Smith, P.R.: eMarketing eXcellence: Planning and Optimizing Your Digital Marketing. Routledge, Abingdon (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, E., Higgins, E.T.: Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: promotion and prevention in decision-making. Org. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 69(2), 117–132 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deliya, M.M.M., Parmar, M.B.J.: Role of packaging on consumer buying behavior–Patan district. Glob. J. Manag. Bus. Res. 12(10) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, C., Merrilees, B., Jayawardhena, C., Tiu Wright, L.: E-consumer behaviour. Eur. J. Mark. 43(9/10), 1121–1139 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N., Schreier, M., Kaiser, U.: The “I designed it myself” effect in mass customization. Manag. Sci. 56(1), 125–140 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, R.S., Förster, J.: The influence of approach and avoidance motor actions on creative cognition. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38(1), 41–55 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, R.S., Förster, J.: The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81(6), 1001 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatautis, R., Vitkauskaite, E.: Crowdsourcing application in marketing activities. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 110, 1243–1250 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, T., Waite, K.: Impact of co-production on consumer perception of empowerment. Serv. Ind. J. 35(10), 502–520 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassenzahl, M., Schöbel, M., Trautmann, T.: How motivational orientation influences the evaluation and choice of hedonic and pragmatic interactive products: the role of regulatory focus. Interact. Comput. 20(4–5), 473–479 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haws, K.L., Dholakia, U.M., Bearden, W.O.: An assessment of chronic regulatory focus measures. J. Mark. Res. 47(5), 967–982 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A.F.: Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Publications, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A.F.: Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: quantification, inference, and interpretation. Commun. Monogr. 85(1), 4–40 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J.L.G., Cote, J.A.: Impression management using typeface design. J. Mark. 68, 60–72 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, A., Reiter-Palmon, R.: The effect of regulatory focus on idea generation and idea evaluation. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 5(1), 13 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E.T.: Beyond pleasure and pain. Am. Psychol. 52(12), 1280 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E.T.: Making a good decision: value from fit. Am. Psychol. 55(11), 1217 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurman, J., Liem, G.A., Ivancovsky, T., Morio, H., Lee, J.: Regulatory focus as an explanatory variable for cross-cultural differences in achievement-related behavior. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 46(2), 171–190 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labrecque, L.I., vor dem Esche, J., Mathwick, C., Novak, T.P., Hofacker, C.F.: Consumer power: evolution in the digital age. J. Interact. Mark. 27(4), 257–269 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loken, B.: Consumer psychology: categorization, inferences, affect, and persuasion. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57, 453–485 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loo, R.: A caveat on using single-item versus multiple-item scales. J. Manag. Psychol. 17(1), 68–75 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, L., Kannan, P.K., Ratchford, B.T.: Incorporating subjective characteristics in product design and evaluations. J. Mark. Res. 45(2), 182–194 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishikawa, H., Schreier, M., Fuchs, C., Ogawa, S.: The value of marketing crowdsourced new products as such: evidence from two randomized field experiments. J. Mark. Res. 54(4), 525–539 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ophuis, P.A.O., Van Trijp, H.C.: Perceived quality: a market driven and consumer oriented approach. Food Qual. Prefer. 6(3), 177–183 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham, M.T., Higgins, E.T.: The state of the art and theoretical propositions. In: Inside Consumption: Consumer Motives, Goals, and Desires, vol. 8 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham, M.T., Avnet, T.: Contingent reliance on the affect heuristic as a function of regulatory focus. Org. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 108(2), 267–278 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pula, K., Parks, C.D., Ross, C.F.: Regulatory focus and food choice motives. Prevention orientation associated with mood, convenience, and familiarity. Appetite 78, 15–22 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rettie, R., Brewer, C.: The verbal and visual components of package design. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 9(1), 56–70 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roest, H., Rindfleisch, A.: The influence of quality cues and typicality cues on restaurant purchase intention. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 17(1), 10–18 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoormans, J.P., Robben, H.S.: The effect of new package design on product attention, categorization and evaluation. J. Econ. Psychol. 18(2), 271–287 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semin, G.R., Higgins, T., de Montes, L.G., Estourget, Y., Valencia, J.F.: Linguistic signatures of regulatory focus: how abstraction fits promotion more than prevention. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 89(1), 36 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silayoi, P., Speece, M.: Packaging and purchase decisions: an exploratory study on the impact of involvement level and time pressure. Br. Food J. 106(8), 607–628 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Edward, S.T.: The influence of visual packaging design on perceived food product quality, value, and brand preference. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 41(10), 805–816 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, J.C., Soutar, G.N.: Consumer perceived value: the development of a multiple item scale. J. Retail. 77(2), 203–220 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van-Dijk, D., Kluger, A.N.: Feedback sign effect on motivation: is it moderated by regulatory focus? Appl. Psychol. 53(1), 113–135 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veryzer Jr., R.W., Hutchinson, J.W.: The influence of unity and prototypicality on aesthetic responses to new product designs. J. Consum. Res. 24(4), 374–394 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werth, L., Foerster, J.: How regulatory focus influences consumer behavior. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 37(1), 33–51 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werle, C.O.C., Boesen-Mariani, S., Gavard-Perret, M.L., Berthaud, S.: Preventing youth obesity: the efficacy of the social risk argument on eating intentions and behaviors. Recherche et Application en Marketing (English Edition) 27(3), 3–27 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerman, S.J., et al.: The design of consumer packaging: effects of manipulations of shape, orientation, and alignment of graphical forms on consumers’ assessments. Food Qual. Prefer. 27(1), 8–17 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V.A.: Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Mark. 52, 2–22 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Annex 1: Stimulus

figure a

Annex 2: Process Macro’s Results

Table 4. Summary of Process Macro results for perceived typicality of Danish and Tunisian samples.
Table 5. Summary of Process Macro results for overall quality perception of Danish and Tunisian samples.
Table 6. Summary of Process Macro results for purchase intention of Danish and Tunisian samples.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ammar, O., Garbout, S., Trigui, I.T. (2018). Co-design and Chronic Regulatory Focus: A Cross-cultural Study and Suggestions for Future e-Marketing Practices. In: Bach Tobji, M., Jallouli, R., Koubaa, Y., Nijholt, A. (eds) Digital Economy. Emerging Technologies and Business Innovation. ICDEc 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 325. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97749-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97749-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97748-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97749-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics