Abstract
In the current globalized scenario, open innovation applied to the public sector is becoming increasingly prominent. This model allows organizations to achieve greater breadth of ideas, which, coupled with internal practices, expand the field of solutions to problems in society. Therefore, glimpses the adoption and use of technological platforms for the management of ideas and open innovation, in order to promote greater relationship and collaboration between governments and citizens. In this context, considering the potential contributions of technological platforms and crowdstorm processes in promoting innovations and improvements in organizations, the present work tries to understand the processes of adoption, implantation and use of a technological platform of ideas management associated with crowdstorm processes, applied to a public university in Brazil. The main objective is to describe the project, here called “Open University: Innovative Solutions”, involving all the processes related to the implantation and use of the PremioIdeia® Technology Platform associated with the crowdstorm approach in a Public University in Brazil. The numbers associated with the project and the themes challenges evidence that crowdstorming brought benefits to the university, such as a greater appreciation of collaborations, the commitment of participants and also a greater interaction among students, teachers and university management. Based on this, it is suggested that projects of this nature can be carried out in other public universities in order to meet a specific demand for academic and administrative improvements and, in this way, promote the growth and evolution of the country’s public universities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Brabham, D.C.: Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application to improve public engagement in transit planning. J. Appl. Commun. Res. 40(3), 307–328 (2012)
Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., Mulgan, G.: The Open Book of Social Innovation, p. 2. National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Art, London (2010)
Lee, S.M., Hwang, T., Choi, D.: Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries. Manag. Decis. 50(1), 147–162 (2012)
Ferrarezi, E., Oliveira, C.G.: Reflexões sobre a emergência da participação social na agenda das políticas públicas: desafios à forma de organização burocrática do Estado (2012)
Vanhaverbeke, W., Van de Vrande, V., Chesbrough, H.: Understanding the advantages of open innovation practices in corporate venturing in terms of real options. Creat. Innov. Manag. 17(4), 251–258 (2008)
Hilgers, D., Ihl, C.: Citizensourcing: applying the concept of open innovation to the public sector. Int. J. Public Particip. 4(1), 67–88 (2010)
Parker, G.G., Van Alstyne, M.W., Choudary, S.P.: Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economyand How to Make Them Work for You. WW Norton & Company, New York (2016)
Abrahamson, S., Ryder, P., Unterberg, B.: Crowdstorm: The Future of Innovation, Ideas, and Problem Solving. Wiley, Hoboken (2013)
Yang, J., Adamic, L.A., Ackerman, M.S.: Crowdsourcing and knowledge sharing: strategic user behavior on Taskcn. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 246–255. ACM, July 2008
Glott, R., Husmann, E., Sadeghi, A.-R., Schunter, M.: Trustworthy clouds underpinning the future internet. In: Domingue, J., et al. (eds.) FIA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6656, pp. 209–221. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20898-0_15
Hofstetter, R., Aryobsei, S., Herrmann, A.: Should you really produce what consumers like online? Empirical evidence for reciprocal voting in open innovation contests. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 35(2), 209–229 (2018)
dos Santos, A.C., Zambalde, A.L., Veroneze, R.B., Botelho, G.A., de Souza Bermejo, P.H.: Open innovation and social participation: a case study in public security in Brazil. In: Kő, A., Francesconi, E. (eds.) EGOVIS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9265, pp. 163–176. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22389-6_12
Paliokas, I., Tzallas, A., Katertsidis, N., Votis, K., Tzovaras, D.: Gamification in social networking: a platform for people living with dementia and their caregivers. In: 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE), pp. 574–579. IEEE, October 2017
Baumöl, U., Hollebeek, L., Jung, R.: Dynamics of customer interaction on social media platforms. Electron. Mark. 26(3), 199–202 (2016)
Li, Z.: Disintermediation and co-opetition in platform ecosystems and modern value chains. Doctoral dissertation (2015)
Mantena, R., Saha, R.L.: Co-opetition between differentiated platforms in two-sided markets. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 29(2), 109–140 (2012)
Snake-Beings, E.: The DiY [‘Do it yourself’] Ethos: a participatory culture of material engagement. Doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato (2016)
Chesbrough, H.W.: Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2006)
Alayed, F.: Citizen adoption of technology mediated social participation systems. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 250–251. ACM, November 2014
Verma, R.K., Kumar, S., Ilavarasan, P.V.: Government portals, social media platforms and citizen engagement in India: some insights. Procedia Comput. Sci. 122, 842–849 (2017)
Martins, T.C.M., de Souza Bermejo, P.H., de Souza, W.V.B.: Open innovation for citizen coproduction. In: Kő, A., Francesconi, E. (eds.) EGOVIS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9265, pp. 177–188. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22389-6_13
Gaventa, J., Barrett, G.: So what difference does it make? Mapping the outcomes of citizen engagement. IDS Work. Papers 2010(347), 01–72 (2010)
Bigliardi, B., Galati, F.: Innovation trends in the food industry: the case of functional foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 31(2), 118–129 (2013)
Inauen, M., Schenker-Wicki, A.: The impact of outside-in open innovation on innovation performance. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 14(4), 496–520 (2011)
Irvin, R.A., Stansbury, J.: Citizen participation in decision making: is it worth the effort? Public Adm. Rev. 64(1), 55–65 (2004)
Linders, D.: From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(4), 446–454 (2012)
Martins, T.C.M., Bermejo, P.H.S.: Open social innovation based on idea crowdsourcing. In: 11th European, Mediterranean & Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems, Big Data in the Era of Cloud Computing and Social Media, Doha, Qatar (2014)
de Souza, W.V.B., et al.: Using crowdstorm to prospect innovations in federal institutions of education in Brazil to reduce its consumption of electric energy. In: 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 2819–2828. IEEE, January 2016
Hopkins, R.: What is crowdsourcing? In: A Guide to Open Innovation and Crowdsourcing, vol. 1, pp. 5–14, Kogan Page, London (2011)
Howe, J.: The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Mag. 14(6), 1–4 (2006)
Sobek II, D.K., Smalley, A.: Understanding A3 Thinking: A Critical Component of Toyota’s PDCA Management System. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2011)
Falconi, V.: O verdadeiro poder. INDG Tecnologia e Serviços Ltda, Nova Lima (2009)
van Loon, Y.: http://ywanvanloon.com/lets-crowdstorm-by-elon-musks-hyperloop-inspired-by-justdirk/. Accessed 10 Feb 2018
Vergara, S.C.: Projetos e relatórios de pesquisa em administração. 16. Atlas, São Paulo (2016)
Godoy, A.S.: Pesquisa qualitativa: tipos fundamentais. Revista de Administração de empresas 35(3), 20–29 (1995)
Sá-Silva, J.R., de Almeida, C.D., Guindani, J.F.: Pesquisa documental: pistas teóricas e metodológicas. Revista brasileira de história & ciências sociais, 1(1) (2009)
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thanks the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq - Brazil) - Process 402789/2015-6 and the Minas Gerais State Foundation for Research Development (FAPEMIG - MG - Brazil) for the financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vilas Boas, K.M., Zambalde, A.L., de Souza Bermejo, P.H., Furtado, T.B., de Freitas Santos, R., Grützmann, A. (2018). Platforms of Ideas Management and Open Innovation: The Crowdstorm Approach Applied to Public University in Brazil. In: Kő, A., Francesconi, E. (eds) Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective. EGOVIS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11032. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98349-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98349-3_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98348-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98349-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)