Skip to main content

A Multi-objective Optimization Algorithm Based on Preference Three-Way Decomposition

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11062))

  • 1411 Accesses

Abstract

Most of refining processes were optimized using single objective approach, but practically such complex processes must be optimized with several objectives. Inspired by the theory of three-way decisions, a multi-objective optimization algorithm based on preference three-way decomposition is proposed in this paper. First, according to the preferences of the DM, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to sort objectives. Then, based on the idea of three-way decisions, these objectives are divided into three sub-parts as the primary objective set, the secondary objective set and the general objective set. Besides, a multi-group parallel optimization algorithm is presented to solve each sub-optimization problem. Finally, based on Non-dominated set of the three sub-problems, a set of external preservation sets are formed so as to get the optimal set that the DM is interested in. Experimental results show that the proposed method can reduce the workload of the DM and obtain more accurately converge to the optimal frontiers of the optimization problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Deb, K., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Zitzler, E.: Scalable test problems for evolutionary multiobjective optimization. In: Abraham, A., Jain, L., Goldberg, R. (eds.) Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer, London (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-137-7_6

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., et al.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deb, K., Sundar, J.: Reference point based multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. In: Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 635–642. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gong, D.W., Liu, Y.P., Sun, X.Y., et al.: Parallel many-objective evolutionary optimization using objectives decomposition. Acta Autom. Sin. 41(8), 1438–1451 (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaddani, S., Vanderpooten, D., Vanpeperstraete, J.M., et al.: Weighted sum model with partial preference information: PineGreen application to multi-objective optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 260(2), 665–679 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Narzisi, G.: Multi-objective optimization: a quick introduction. New York University lectures (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Purshouse, R.C., Fleming, P.J.: Evolutionary many-objective optimisation: an exploratory analysis. Evol. Comput. 3, 2066–2073 (2003). CEC

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shen, X., Yu, G., Chen, Q., et al.: A multi-objective optimization evolutionary algorithm incorporating preference information based on fuzzy logic. Comput. Optim. Appl. 46(1), 159–188 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Yao, Y.Y.: The superiority of three-way decisions in probabilistic rough set models. Inf. Sci. 181(6), 1080–1096 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Zeman, J.: Ontological and gnoseological aspects of contradiction and their importance in analysis of the development of scientific knowledge. In: Handbook of Professional Ethics for Psychologists (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zitzler, E., Deb, K., Thiele, L.: Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results. Evol. Comput. 8(2), 173–195 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61751312, 61533020 and 61379114.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Yu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fu, Z., Yu, H., Zhang, H., Chen, X. (2018). A Multi-objective Optimization Algorithm Based on Preference Three-Way Decomposition. In: Liu, W., Giunchiglia, F., Yang, B. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11062. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99247-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99247-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99246-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99247-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics