Abstract
Cell membrane-bound receptors control signal initiation in many important cellular signaling pathways. In many such systems, receptor dimerization or cross-linking is a necessary step for activation, making signaling pathways sensitive to the distribution of receptors in the membrane. Microscopic imaging and modern labeling techniques reveal that certain receptor types tend to co-localize in clusters, ranging from a few to tens, and sometimes hundreds of members. The origin of these clusters is not well understood but they are likely not the result of chemical binding. Our goal is to build a simple, descriptive framework which provides quantitative measures that can be compared across samples and systems, as groundwork for more ambitious modeling aimed at uncovering specific biochemical mechanisms. Here we discuss a method of defining clusters based on mutual distance, applying it to a set of transmission microscopy images of VEGF receptors. Preliminary analysis using standard measures such as the Hopkins’ statistic reveals a compelling difference between the observed distributions and random placement. A key element to cluster identification is identifying an optimal length parameter \(L^*\). Distance based clustering hinges on the separation between two length scales: the typical distance between neighboring points within a cluster vs. the typical distance between clusters. This provides a guiding principle to identify \(L^*\) from experimentally derived cluster scaling functions. In addition, we assign a geometric shape to each cluster, using a previously developed procedure that relates closely to distance based clustering. We applied the cluster [support] identification procedure to the entire data set. The observed particle distribution results are consistent with the random placement of receptors within the clusters and, to a lesser extent, the random placement of the clusters on the cell membrane. Deviations from uniformity are typically due to large scale gradients in receptor density and/or the emergence of “mega-clusters” that are very likely the expression of a different biological function than the one behind the emergence of the quasi-ubiquitous small scale clusters.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
For the nearest neighbor distance, the mean is \(\langle r \rangle _\mathsf {_{NN}}= b{/}2\) and the mode (maximum probability) \(r^*_\mathsf {_{NN}} = b /\sqrt{2\pi } \) corresponds to the radius of a circle of area A / N, \(\pi {r^*_\mathsf {_{NN}}}^2 = b^2 = 1 /\lambda \).
- 2.
We use “optimal length parameter” (\(L^*\)) to distinguish from the specific choice of [5].
- 3.
From Eqs. (1) and (S4):\(\langle r \rangle _\mathsf {_{NN}} = \frac{1}{2}b\), \(\langle r \rangle _\mathsf {_{NN2}} = \frac{3}{4}b\) where \(b^2=\frac{A}{N}\); all images have the same area.
References
Birk, D.A., Barbato, J., Mureebe, L., Chaer, R.A.: Current insights on the biology and clinical aspects of VEGF regulation. Vasc Endovasc. Surg 42, 517–530 (2010)
Day, N.E.: Estimating the components of a mixture of normal distributions. Biometrika 56(3), 463–474 (1969)
Dixon, P.M.: Encyclopedia of Environmetrics, vol. 3, pp. 1796–1803. Wiley, Chichester (2002). Chap. Ripley’s \(K\) function
Edidin, M.: Lipid microdomains in cell surface membranes. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7(4), 528–532 (1997)
Espinoza, F.A., Oliver, J.M., Wilson, B.S.: Using hierarchical clustering and dendrograms to quantify the clustering of membrane proteins. Bull. Math. Biol. 74(1), 190–211 (2011)
Ester, M., Kriegel, H.-P., Sander, J., Xu, X.: A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In: Simoudis, E., Han, J., Fayyad, U.M. (eds.) Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-1996), pp. 226–231. AAAI Press (1996). ISBN 1-57735-004-9
Ferrara, N., Hilla, K.J., Gerber, H.P., Novotny, W.: Discovery and development of bevazicumab, an anti-VEGF antibody for treating cancer. Net Rev. Drug Discov. 3, 391–400 (2004)
Hanahan, D., Folkman, J.: Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenetic switch during tumorigenesis. Cell 86, 353–364 (1996)
Jain, A., Murty, M., Flynn, P.: Data clustering: a review. ACM Comput. Surv. 31(3), 264–323 (1999)
Jain, A.K., Dubes, R.C.: Algorithms for Clustering Data, p. 218. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1988)
Karamysheva, A.F.: Mechanisms of angiogenesis. Biochemistry (Mosc) 73, 751–762 (2008)
Levet, F., et al.: SR-Tesseler: a method to segment and quantify localization-based super-resolution microscopy data. Nat. Methods 12(11), 1065–1071 (2015)
Lingwood, D., Simons, K.: Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle. Science 327(5961), 46–50 (2010)
Moltchanov, D.: Distance distributions in random networks. Ad Hoc Netw. 10(6), 1146–1166 (2012)
Nagy, P., et al.: Lipid rafts and the local density of ErbB proteins influence the biological role of homo-and heteroassociations of ErbB2. J. Cell Sci. 115(22), 4251–4262 (2002)
Olsson, D.A., Kreuger, J., Claesson-Welsh, L.: VEGF receptor signaling - in control of vascular function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 359–371 (2006)
Plouet, J., Schilling, J., Gospodarowicz, D.: Isolation and characterization of a newly identified endothelial cell mitogen produced by AtT-20 cells. EMBO J. 8, 3801–3806 (1989)
Pryor, M.M.: Orchestration of ErbB3 signaling through heterointeractions and homointeractions. Mol. Biol. Cell 26(22), 4109–4123 (2015)
Radhakrishnan, K., Halász, Á., McCabe, M.M., Edwards, J.S., Wilson, B.S.: Mathematical simulation of membrane protein clustering for efficient signal transduction. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40(11), 2307–2318 (2012)
Ritchie, K., Kusumi, A.: Single-particle tracking image microscopy. Methods Enzymol. 360, 618–634 (2003)
Senger, D.R., Galli, S.J., Dvorak, A.M., Perruzzi, C.A., Harvey, V.S., Dvorak, H.F.: Tumor cells secrete a vascular permeability factor that promotes accumulation of ascites fluid. Science 219, 983–985 (1983)
Wilson, S., et al.: Exploring membrane domains using native membrane sheets and transmission electron microscopy. In: McIntosh, T.J. (ed.) Lipid Rafts. Humana Press, Totowa (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-513-8_17
Zhang, J., Leiderman, K., Pfeiffer, J.R., Wilson, B.S., Oliver, J.M., Steinberg, S.L.: Characterizing the topography of membrane receptors and signaling molecules from spatial patterns obtained using nanometer-scale electron-dense probes and electron microscopy. Micron 37, 14–34 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
A Methods
A Methods
Experimental details, mathematical definitions and methodologies, and their justification are provided as supplementary materials available at https://www.dropbox.com/s/8bggjrzhzr1vsne/Supplementary-Materials-Clustering-Paper.pdf?dl=0.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Güven, E., Wester, M.J., Wilson, B.S., Edwards, J.S., Halász, Á.M. (2018). Characterization of the Experimentally Observed Clustering of VEGF Receptors. In: Češka, M., Šafránek, D. (eds) Computational Methods in Systems Biology. CMSB 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11095. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99429-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99429-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99428-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99429-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)