Skip to main content

Cross-Scenario Inference Based Event-Event Relation Detection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing (NLPCC 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11109))

Abstract

Event-Event Relation Detection (RD\(_{2e}\)) aims to detect the relations between a pair of news events, such as Causal relation between Criminal and Penal events. In general, RD\(_{2e}\) is a challenging task due to the lack of explicit linguistic feature signaling the relations. We propose a cross-scenario inference method for RD\(_{2e}\). By utilizing conceptualized scenario expression and graph-based semantic distance perception, we retrieve semantically similar historical events from Gigaword. Based on explicit relations of historical events, we infer implicit relations of target events by means of transfer learning. Experiments on 10 relation types show that our method outperforms the supervised models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.seas.upenn.edu/~pdtb/.

  2. 2.

    https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/LDC2003T05.

  3. 3.

    https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/fndrupal/fulltextIndex.

References

  1. Abe, S., Inui, K., Matsumoto, Y.: Acquiring event relation knowledge by learning cooccurrence patterns and fertilizing cooccurrence samples with verbal nouns. In: IJCNLP, pp. 497–504 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abe, S., Inui, K., Matsumoto, Y.: Two-phased event relation acquisition: coupling the relation-oriented and argument-oriented approaches. In: COLING, pp. 1–8 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blanco, E., Castell, N., Moldovan, D.I.: Causal relation extraction. In: LREC (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Caselli, T., Fokkens, A., Morante, R., Vossen, P.: Spinoza vu: an NLP pipeline for cross document timelines. In: SemEval-2015 p. 787 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chang, D.-S., Choi, K.-S.: Causal relation extraction using cue phrase and lexical pair probabilities. In: Su, K.-Y., Tsujii, J., Lee, J.-H., Kwong, O.Y. (eds.) IJCNLP 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3248, pp. 61–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30211-7_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Do, Q.X., Chan, Y.S., Roth, D.: Minimally supervised event causality identification. In: EMNLP, pp. 294–303 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gildea, D., Palmer, M.: The necessity of parsing for predicate argument recognition. In: ACL, pp. 239–246 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Girju, R., Moldovan, D.I., et al.: Text mining for causal relations. In: FLAIRS, pp. 360–364 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hong, Y., Zhang, T., O’Gorman, T., Horowit-Hendler, S., Ji, H., Palmer, M.: Building a cross-document event-event relation corpus. In: LAW X, p. 1 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Inui, T., Inui, K., Matsumoto, Y.: Acquiring causal knowledge from text using the connective marker tame. TALIP 4(4), 435–474 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ittoo, A., Bouma, G.: Extracting explicit and implicit causal relations from sparse, domain-specific texts. In: Muñoz, R., Montoyo, A., Métais, E. (eds.) NLDB 2011. LNCS, vol. 6716, pp. 52–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22327-3_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Lapata, M., Lascarides, A.: Learning sentence-internal temporal relations. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 27, 85–117 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, Z., Ng, H.T., Kan, M.Y.: A PDTB-styled end-to-end discourse parser. Nat. Lang. Eng. 20(02), 151–184 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mani, I., Verhagen, M., Wellner, B., Lee, C.M., Pustejovsky, J.: Machine learning of temporal relations. In: COLING and ACL, pp. 753–760 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Migon, H.S., Gamerman, D., Louzada, F.: Statistical inference: an integrated approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Minard, A.L., et al.: Semeval-2015 task 4: Timeline: Cross-document event ordering. In: SemEval, pp. 778–786 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miwa, M., Bansal, M.: End-to-end relation extraction using lstms on sequences and tree structures (2016). arXiv preprint. arXiv:1601.00770

  18. Pitler, E., Louis, A., Nenkova, A.: Automatic sense prediction for implicit discourse relations in text. In: ACL and AFNLP, pp. 683–691 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prasad, R., et al.: The penn discourse treebank 2.0. In: LREC (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pustejovsky, J., Verhagen, M.: Semeval-2010 task 13: evaluating events, time expressions, and temporal relations (tempeval-2). In: Workshop on Semantic Evaluations, pp. 112–116 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Radinsky, K., Davidovich, S., Markovitch, S.: Learning causality for news events prediction. In: WWW, pp. 909–918 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Raja, K., Subramani, S., Natarajan, J.: Ppinterfinder–a mining tool for extracting causal relations on human proteins from literature. Database 2013, bas052 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rugemalira, J.M.: What is a symmetrical language? multiple object constructions in Bantu. In: Berkeley Linguistics Society, vol. 17 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Santos, C.N.d., Xiang, B., Zhou, B.: Classifying relations by ranking with convolutional neural networks (2015). arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.06580

  25. Velupillai, S., Mowery, D.L., Abdelrahman, S., Christensen, L., Chapman, W.W.: Blulab: Temporal information extraction for the 2015 clinical tempeval challenge. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), pp. 815-819 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou, Z.M., Xu, Y., Niu, Z.Y., Lan, M., Su, J., Tan, C.L.: Predicting discourse connectives for implicit discourse relation recognition. In: COLING, pp. 1507–1514 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zou, B., Zhou, G., Zhu, Q.: Tree kernel-based negation and speculation scope detection with structured syntactic parse features. In: EMNLP, pp. 968–976 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the national Natural Science Foundation of China via Nos. 2017YFB1002104, 61672368 and 61672367.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianmin Yao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hong, Y., Zhang, J., Song, R., Yao, J. (2018). Cross-Scenario Inference Based Event-Event Relation Detection. In: Zhang, M., Ng, V., Zhao, D., Li, S., Zan, H. (eds) Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing. NLPCC 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11109. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99501-4_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99501-4_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99500-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99501-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics