Abstract
The paper explores the relationship between expert manual annotation of German spontaneous speech and annotator’s individuality with regard to personality traits, working memory capacity and processing speed. The research question is whether there is a relationship between the annotated sentence length and individual traits of the annotator. The participants were asked to detect sentence boundaries in the transcripts of German spontaneous monologues and to perform several test tasks. Personality traits were examined using the Five Factor Personality Inventory. Working memory capacity was measured through reading span and operation span tasks. To compute processing speed we used Letter Comparison and Pattern Comparison tasks. Linear mixed modelling revealed the significant effect of the personality trait “Neuroticism” on the length of annotated sentences. Contrary to the initial hypothesis, working memory capacity of annotators was not related to sentence length. Processing speed did not have any effect on sentence length either.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Guaïtella, I.: Rhythm in speech: what rhythmic organizations reveal about cognitive processes in spontaneous speech production versus reading aloud. J. Pragmat. 31, 509–523 (1999)
Lee, A., Glass, J.: Sentence detection using multiple annotations. In: Proceedings of Interspeech 2012, pp. 1848–1851 (2012)
Stepikhov, A.: Resolving ambiguities in sentence boundary detection in Russian spontaneous speech. In: Habernal, I., Matoušek, V. (eds.) TSD 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8082, pp. 426–433. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40585-3_54
Stepikhov, A., Loukina, A.: Sentence boundaries in text and pauses in speech: correlation or confrontation? In: Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. The University of Glasgow, Glasgow, pp. 0588.1–05885 (2015)
Vannikov, Yu., Abdalyan, I.: Eksperimental’noe issledovanie chleneniya razgovornoj rechi na diskretnye intonacionno-smyslovye edinicy (frazy). In: Sirotinina, O.B., et al. (eds.) Russkaya razgovornaya rech, Saratov, pp. 40–46 (1973). (in Russian)
Chistikov, P., Khomitsevich, O.: Online automatic sentence boundary detection in a Russian ASR system. In: Potapova, R.K. (ed.) SPECOM 2011, Russia, Kazan, pp. 112–117 (2011)
Stepikhov, A.: Analysis of expert manual annotation of the Russian spontaneous monologue: evidence from sentence boundary detection. In: Železný, M., Habernal, I., Ronzhin, A. (eds.) SPECOM 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8113, pp. 33–40. Springer, Cham (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01931-4_5
Stepikhov, A., Loukina, A.: Annotation and personality: individual differences in sentence boundary detection. In: Ronzhin, A., Potapova, R., Delic, V. (eds.) SPECOM 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8773, pp. 105–112. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11581-8_13
Stepikhov, A., Loukina, A.: Low inter-annotator agreement in sentence boundary detection and annotator personality. In: Ronzhin, A., Potapova, R., Németh, G. (eds.) SPECOM 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9811, pp. 461–468. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43958-7_55
Block, J.: The five-factor framing of personality and beyond: some ruminations. Psychol. Inq. 21(1), 2–25 (2010)
Swets, B., Desmet, T., Hambrick, D.Z., Ferreira, F.: The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: a psychometric approach. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 136(1), 64–81 (2007)
Conway, A.R.A., Kane, M.J., Bunting, M.F., Hambrick, D.Z., Wilhelm, O., Engle, R.W.: Working memory span tasks: a methodological review and user’s guide. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12(5), 769–786 (2005)
Rammstedt, B., Danner, D.: Die Facettenstruktur des Big Five Inventory (BFI): Validierung für die deutsche Adaptation des BFI. Diagnostica 63(1), 70–84 (2017)
Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R.: Revised Neo Personality Inventory And Neo Five Factor Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa (1992)
von der Malsburg, T.: Py-Span-Task - A software for testing working memory span (2015). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18238
Salthouse, T.A.: The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychol. Rev. 103(3), 403–428 (1996)
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P.B., Christensen, R.H.B.: lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.0-20. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Humanities, project No. 15-04-00165, and fellowship programme “Dmitri Mendeleev” of St. Petersburg University and DAAD, project No. 31.23.951.2016. We are grateful to Natalia Gagarina, Hubert Truckenbrodt and Nathalie Topaj from Leibniz-Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft (ZAS), Berlin, Germany, for their help in organising the experiment. We also thank Susanne Fuchs (ZAS) for her valuable suggestions in the process of experimental design and all the participants of the experiment.
We are also grateful to Beata Beigman Klebanov, Su-Youn Yoon, Jill Burstein and the three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stepikhov, A., Loukina, A. (2018). Personality, Working Memory Capacity and Expert Manual Annotation of German Spontaneous Speech. In: Karpov, A., Jokisch, O., Potapova, R. (eds) Speech and Computer. SPECOM 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11096. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99579-3_67
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99579-3_67
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99578-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99579-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)