Abstract
Road transport system is one of the essential infrastructures in the world, where the majority of the population use its facilities on a daily basis. That is why ensuring their safety has been always a growing concern for most authorities. The automotive industry is already aware of that, and the ISO 26262, a standard for developing functional safety systems for vehicles, has been developed. Although current studies have shown that the root cause for most of the accidents has shifted from vehicle-centric to driver-centric, the main objective of ISO 26262 is covering electronic and electric (E/E) systems of vehicles with almost no emphasis on the driver itself. To this end, we propose a holistic approach based on the ISO 26262 standard that not only considers the E/E systems of the vehicle but also the driver’s behaviour. We illustrate the utility of the approach with an example from the automotive domain.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
QM is assigned to hazards with very low probability or causing only slight injuries.
- 2.
P. and C. represent the Parts and Clauses of ISO 26262 respectively.
- 3.
A SG may cover multiple hazardous events.
- 4.
The identified hazards are not complete nor exclusive due to space limitation.
- 5.
FSR1.1, FSR1.2, FSR1.3 can also be derived from SG2, but since ISO 26262 requires to keep the FSRs list atomic, they are not derived again from SG2.
References
Ridderhof, W., Gross, H.-G., Doerr, H.: Establishing evidence for safety cases in automotive systems – a case study. In: Saglietti, F., Oster, N. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4680, pp. 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75101-4_1
Törner, F., Öhman, P.: Automotive safety case a qualitative case study of drivers, usages, and issues. In: 11th HASE, pp. 313–322. IEEE (2008)
Zhang, H., Li, W., Chen, W.: Model-based hazard analysis method on automotive programmable electronic system. In: International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI), pp. 2658–2661. IEEE (2010)
ISO: 26262: Road Vehicles-Functional safety. IS ISO/FDIS 26262 (2011)
McCall, J.C., Trivedi, M.M.: Driver behavior and situation aware brake assistance for intelligent vehicles. Proc.-IEEE 95(2), 374 (2007)
Taib, R., Yu, K., Jung, J., Hess, A., Maier, A.: Human-centric analysis of driver inattention. In: Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Workshops, pp. 7–12. IEEE (2013)
Dong, Y., Hu, Z., Uchimura, K., Murayama, N.: Driver inattention monitoring system for intelligent vehicles: a review. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 12(2, SI), 596–614 (2011)
Lee, J.D., Young, K.L., Regan, M.A.: Defining driver distraction. Driv. Distraction: Theor. Eff. Mitig. 13(4), 31–40 (2008)
Tawari, A., Sivaraman, S., Trivedi, M.M., Shannon, T., Tippelhofer, M.: Looking-in and looking-out vision for urban intelligent assistance: estimation of driver attentive state and dynamic surround for safe merging and braking. In: Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Proceedings, pp. 115–120. IEEE (2014)
Jesty, P.H., Hobley, K.M., Evans, R., Kendall, I.: Safety analysis of vehicle-based systems. In: Proceedings of the Safety-Critical Systems Symposium, pp. 90–110 (2000)
Giese, H., Tichy, M., Schilling, D.: Compositional hazard analysis of UML component and deployment models. In: Heisel, M., Liggesmeyer, P., Wittmann, S. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3219, pp. 166–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30138-7_15
Li, W., Zhang, H.: A software hazard analysis method for automotive control system. In: International Conference on Computer Science and Automation Engineering (CSAE), vol. 3, pp. 744–748. IEEE (2011)
Basir, N., Denney, E., Fischer, B.: Deriving safety cases for hierarchical structure in model-based development. In: Schoitsch, E. (ed.) SAFECOMP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6351, pp. 68–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15651-9_6
Palin, R., Ward, D., Habli, I., Rivett, R.: ISO 26262 safety cases: compliance and assurance. In: International Conference on System Safety, pp. 1–6 (2011)
Habli, I., Ibarra, I., Rivett, R.S., Kelly, T.: Model-based assurance for justifying automotive functional safety. Technical report, SAE Technical Paper (2010)
Mehrpouyan, H., Bunus, P., Kurtoglu, T.: Model-based hazard analysis of undesirable environmental and components interaction. In: Aerospace Conference, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2012)
Acknowledgment
This work has been partially supported by the “Ente Cassa Di Risparmio di Firenze”, Bando per progetti 2016, and by the FAR-FAS 2014 TOSCA-FI project funded by the Tuscany Region.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gharib, M., Lollini, P., Ceccarelli, A., Bondavalli, A. (2018). Dealing with Functional Safety Requirements for Automotive Systems: A Cyber-Physical-Social Approach. In: D'Agostino, G., Scala, A. (eds) Critical Information Infrastructures Security. CRITIS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10707. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99843-5_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99843-5_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99842-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99843-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)