Skip to main content

Comparison of Selected Fusion Methods from the Abstract and Rank Levels in a System Using Pawlak’s Approach to Coalition Formation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Beyond Databases, Architectures and Structures. Facing the Challenges of Data Proliferation and Growing Variety (BDAS 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 928))

Abstract

In this paper, a decision system that uses dispersed knowledge is considered. In particular, an ensemble of classifiers in which the relations between classifiers are analyzed and coalitions of classifiers that are formed is discussed. In a previous work, the use of Pawlak’s conflict model in order to create such coalitions was proposed. In this paper, four fusion methods are used in this system – two from the abstract level and two from the rank level. The results that were obtained using these four methods were compared and some conclusions are presented in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baarslag, T., et al.: Evaluating practical negotiating agents: results and analysis of the 2011 international competition. Artif. Intell. 198(Suppl. C), 73–103 (2013). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370212001105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barabash, Y.L.: Collective Statistical Decisions in Recognition. Radio i Sviaz, Moscow (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burduk, R.: Classifier fusion with interval-valued weights. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 34(14), 1623–1629 (2013). Innovative Knowledge Based Techniques in Pattern Recognition. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167865513002201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E., Pedrycz, W.: A method based on pso and granular computing of linguistic information to solve group decision making problems defined in heterogeneous contexts. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 230(3), 624–633 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Fumera, G., Roli, F.: A theoretical and experimental analysis of linear combiners for multiple classifier systems. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 27(6), 942–956 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 129(1), 1–47 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ksieniewicz, P., Krawczyk, B., Woźniak, M.: Ensemble of extreme learning machines with trained classifier combination and statistical features for hyperspectral data. Neurocomputing 271(Suppl. C), 28–37 (2018). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231217312195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, W.L.: An ensemble-based data fusion approach for characterizing ultrasonic liver tissue. Appl. Soft Comput. 13, 3683–3692 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pawlak, Z.: On conflicts. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 21(2), 127–134 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pawlak, Z.: An inquiry into anatomy of conflicts. Inf. Sci. 109(1–4), 65–78 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Przybyła-Kasperek, M.: Two methods of combining classifiers, which are based on decision templates and theory of evidence, in a dispersed decision-making system. In: Kozielski, S., Mrozek, D., Kasprowski, P., Małysiak-Mrozek, B., Kostrzewa, D. (eds.) BDAS 2015-2016. CCIS, vol. 613, pp. 109–119. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34099-9_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Przybyła-Kasperek, M.: Methods based on pawlak’s model of conflict analysis - medical applications. In: Polkowski, L., et al. (eds.) IJCRS 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10313, pp. 249–262. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60837-2_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Przybyła-Kasperek, M., Wakulicz-Deja, A.: A dispersed decision-making system - the use of negotiations during the dynamic generation of a system’s structure. Inf. Sci. 288(Suppl. C), 194–219 (2014). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025514007324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Przybyła-Kasperek, M., Wakulicz-Deja, A.: The strength of coalition in a dispersed decision support system with negotiations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 252(3), 947–968 (2016). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221716300285

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Przybyła-Kasperek, M., Wakulicz-Deja, A.: Comparison of fusion methods from the abstract level and the rank level in a dispersed decision-making system. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 46, 386–413 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Smirnov, D.V., Muraleedharan, R., Ramachandran, R.P.: A comparison of facial features and fusion methods for emotion recognition. In: Arik, S., Huang, T., Lai, W.K., Liu, Q. (eds.) ICONIP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9492, pp. 574–582. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26561-2_68

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Sosnowski, Ł.: Framework of compound object comparators. Intell. Decis. Technol. 9(4), 343–363 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stefanowski, J.: An experimental study of methods combining multiple classifiers - diversified both by feature selection and bootstrap sampling. In: Atanassov, T., Kacprzyk, J., Krawczak, M., Szmidt, E. (eds.) Issues in the Representation and Processing of Uncertain and Imprecise Information, pp. 337–354. Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza EXIT (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Szczuka, M., Ślȩzak, D.: Feedforward neural networks for compound signals. Theor. Comput. Sci. 412(42), 5960–5973 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Małgorzata Przybyła-Kasperek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Przybyła-Kasperek, M. (2018). Comparison of Selected Fusion Methods from the Abstract and Rank Levels in a System Using Pawlak’s Approach to Coalition Formation. In: Kozielski, S., Mrozek, D., Kasprowski, P., Małysiak-Mrozek, B., Kostrzewa, D. (eds) Beyond Databases, Architectures and Structures. Facing the Challenges of Data Proliferation and Growing Variety. BDAS 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 928. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99987-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99987-6_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99986-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99987-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics