Skip to main content

Using Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules for Intelligent Tutoring System’s Knowledge Acquisition

  • Conference paper
Book cover AI 2003: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2903))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This research focuses on the knowledge acquisition (KA) for an intelligent tutoring system (ITS). ITSs have been developed to provide considerable flexibility in presentation of learning materials and greater abilities to respond to individual students’ needs. Our system aims to support experts who want to accumulate the classification knowledge. Rule based reasoning has been widely used in ITSs. Knowledge acquisition bottleneck is a major problem in ITSs as it is known in AI area. This problem hinders the diffusion of ITSs. MCRDR is a well known knowledge acquisition methodology and mainly used in classification domain. MCRDR is used to acquire knowledge for the classification of learning materials (objects). The new ITS is used to develop a part of online education system for the people who learn English as a second language. Our experiment results show that the classification of learning materials can be more flexible and can be organized in multiple contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ainsworth, S., Grimshaw, S., Underwood, J.: Teachers Implementing Pedagogy through REDEEM. Computer and Education 33, 171–187 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beck, J., Stern, M., Haugsjaa, E.: Applications of AI in Education

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buchanan, B., Shortliffe, E. (eds.): Rule based Expert System: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burke, R.: Conceptual Indexing and Active Retrieval of Video for Interactive Learning Environments. Knowledge-Based Systems 9, 491–499 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Compton, P.J., Jansen, R.: A Philosophical Basis for Knowledge Acquisition. In: 3rd European Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, Paris, p. 75–89 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Compton, P.: Insight and Knowledge in AAAI Spring Symposium: Cognitive aspects of knowledge acquisition, Stanford University, pp. 57–63 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Compton, P., Edwards, G., Kang, B., Lazarus, L., Malor, R., Menzies, T., Preston, P., Srinivasan, A., Sammut, C.: Ripple Down Rules: Possibilities and Limitations. In: 6th Bannf AAAI Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Based Systems Workshop, Banff (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Compton, P., Kang, B., Preston, P., Mulholland, M.: Knowledge Acquisition without Analysis. Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Based Systems. In: Aussenac, N., Boy, G.A., Ganascia, J.-G., Kodratoff, Y., Linster, M., Gaines, B.R. (eds.) EKAW 1993. LNCS, vol. 723, pp. 278–299. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Compton, P., Richard, D.: Extending Ripple Down Rules. In: The 4th Australian Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, University of NSW, Sydney, pp. 87–101 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kang, B., Compton, P., Preston, P.: Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules: Evaluation and Possibilities. In: Proceedings of the 9th AAAI-Sponsored Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, Banff, Canada, University of Calgary (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Evens, M.W., Brandle, S., Chang, R., Freedman, R., Glass, M., Lee, Y.H., Shim, L.S., Woo, C.W., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y., Michael, J.A., Rovick, A.A.: CIRCSIM-Tutor: An Intelligent Tutoring System using Natural Language Dialogue. In: 12th Midwest AI and Cognitive Science Conference, Oxford OH, pp. 16–23 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frasson, C., Aimeur, E.: Designing a Multi-Strategic Intelligent Tutoring System for Training in Industry. Computers in Industry 37, 153–167 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hayes-Roth, F., Waterman, D.A., Lenat, D.B. (eds.): Building Expert Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Heffernan, N.T., Koedinger, K.R.: An Intelligent Tutoring System Incorporating a Model of an Experienced Human Tutor

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, Y.C., Evens, M.W., Michael, J.A., Trace, D.: Physiology Tutorials Using Casual Concept Mapping. In: 13th Midwest AI and Cognitive Science Conference, Chicago IL, pp. 61–64 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kolodner, J.L., Jona, M.Y.: Case-Based Reasoning: An Overview in Technical Report #15 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Larkin, J., Chabay, R., Sheftic, C. (eds.): Computer-assisted Instruction and Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Establishing Communication and Collaboration, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nussbaum, M., Rosas, R., Peirano, I., Cardenas, F.: Development of Intelligent Tutoring Systems Using Knowledge Structures. Computer and Education 36, 15–32 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Polson, M.C., Richardson, J.J. (eds.): Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 21–53. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Popper, K.: Conjectures and Refutations. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schank, R.C.: Case-Based Teaching: Four Experiences in Educational Software Design. Interactive Learning Environments 1(4), 231–253 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schulze, K.G., Shelby, R.N., Treacy, D.J., Wintersgill, M.C.: Andes: A Coached Learning Environment for Classical Newtonian Physics. In: 11th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning

    Google Scholar 

  23. Slade, S.: Cased-Based Reasoning: A Research Paradigm. AI Magazine 12(1), 42 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sokolnicki, T.: Towards Knowledge-Based Tutors: a Survey and Appraisal of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review 6(2), 59–95 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou, Y., Freedman, R., Glass, M.: Delivering Hints in a Dialog-Based Intelligent Tutoring System. In: Proceedings of 16th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1999), Orlando (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Woolf, B.: Theoretical Frontiers in Building a Machine Tutor. In: Kearsley, G. (ed.) Artificial Intelligence and Instruction-Applications and methods, Addison-Wesley, Reading (1987)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kim, Y.S., Park, S.S., Kang, B.H., Lim, J.S. (2003). Using Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules for Intelligent Tutoring System’s Knowledge Acquisition. In: Gedeon, T.(.D., Fung, L.C.C. (eds) AI 2003: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2903. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24581-0_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24581-0_43

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20646-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24581-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics