Skip to main content

The Features People Use to Recognize Human Movement Style

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2915))

Abstract

Observation of human movement informs a variety of person properties. However, it is unclear how this understanding of person properties is derived from the complex visual stimulus of human movement. I address this topic by first reviewing the literature on the visual perception of human movement and then discussing work that has explored the features used to discriminate between different styles of movement. This discussion includes work on quantifying human performance at style recognition, exaggeration of human movement and finally experimental derivation of a feature space to represent human emotion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Johansson, G.: Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics 14, 201–211 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kozlowski, L.T., Cutting, J.E.: Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic pointlight display. Perception and Psychophysics 21, 575–580 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barclay, C.D., Cutting, J.E., Kozlowski, L.T.: Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition. Perception and Psychophysics 23, 145–152 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cutting, J.E., Kozlowski, L.T.: Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 9, 353–356 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beardsworth, T., Buckner, T.: The ability to recognize oneself from a video recording of one’s movements without seeing one’s body. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 18, 19–22 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hoffman, D.D., Flinchbaugh, B.E.: The interpretation of biological motion. Biological Cybernetics 42, 195–204 (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cutting, J.E., Proffitt, D.: Gait perception as an example of how we perceive events. In: Walk, R., Pick Jr., H. (eds.) Intersensory perception and sensory integration. Plenum, New York (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bertenthal, B.I., Pinto, J.: Global processing of biological motions. Psychological Science 5, 221–225 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Runeson, S., Frykholm, G.: Visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 7, 733–740 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Runeson, S., Frykholm, G.: Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General 112, 585–615 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fox, R., McDaniel, C.: The perception of biological motion by human infants. Science 218, 486–487 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bertenthal, B.I., Proffitt, D.R., Kramer, S.J., Spetner, N.B.: Infants encoding of kinetic displays varying in relative coherence. Developmental Psychology 23, 171–178 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mather, G., Radford, K., West, S.: Low-Level Visual Processing of Biological Motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 249, 149–155 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Neri, P., Morrone, M.C., Burr, D.C.: Seeing biological motion. Nature 395, 894–896 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shiffrar, M., Freyd, J.J.: Apparent motion of the human body. Psychological Science 1, 257–264 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shiffrar, M., Freyd, J.J.: Timing and apparent motion path choice with human body photographs. Psychological Science 4, 379–384 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thornton, I.M., Pinto, J., Shiffrar, M.: The visual perception of human locomotion. Cognitive Neuropsychology 15, 535–552 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Giese, M.A., Poggio, T.: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4, 179–192 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Oram, M.W., Perrett, D.I.: Responses of Anterior Superior Temporal Polysensory (Stpa) Neurons to Biological Motion Stimuli. Journal of CognitiveNeuroscience 6, 99–116 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Decety, J., Grezes, J.: Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3, 172–178 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Grezes, J., Fonlupt, P., Bertenthal, B., Delon-Martin, C., Segebarth, C., Decety, J.: Does perception of biological motion rely on specific brain regions? Neuroimage 13, 775–785 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grossman, E., Donnelly, M., Price, R., Pickens, D., Morgan, V., Neighbor, G., Blake, R.: Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12, 711–720 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Adolphs, R.: The neurobiology of social cognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 11, 231–239 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Allison, T., Puce, A., McCarthy, G.: Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4, 267–278 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V.: Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, 661–670 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Troje, N.F.: Decomposing biological motion: A framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. Journal of Vision 2, 371–387 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Verfaillie, K.: Orientation-Dependent Priming Effects in the Perception of Biological Motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 19, 992–1013 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Verfaillie, K.: Transsaccadic memory for the egocentric and allocentric position of a biological-motion walker. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition 23, 739–760 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Verfaillie, K., Detroy, A., Vanrensbergen, J.: Transsaccadic Integration of Biological Motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition 20, 649–670 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dittrich, W.H.: Action categories and the perception of biological motion. Perception 22, 15–22 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pollick, F.E., Lestou, V., Ryu, J., Cho, S.-B.: Estimating the efficiency of recognizing gender and affect from biological motion. Vision Research 42, 2345–2355 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Pollick, F.E., Kay, J., Heim, K., Stringer, R.: A review of gender recognition from gait. Perception 31, 118–118 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Perrett, D.I., May, K.A., Yoshikawa, S.: Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature 368, 239–242 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Perrett, D.I., Lee, K.J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D.M., Henzi, S.P., Castles, D.L., Akamatsu, S.: Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394, 884–887 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rhodes, G., Brennan, S., Carey, S.: Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for learning the mental representations of faces. Cognitive Psychology 19, 473–497 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rhodes, G.: Superportraits: caricatures and recognition. Psychology Press, Hove (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Pollick, F.E., Fidopiastis, C.M., Braden, V.: Recognizing the style of spatially exaggerated tennis serves. Perception 30, 323–338 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hill, H., Pollick, F.E.: Exaggerating temporal differences enhances recognition of individuals from point light displays. Psychological Science 11, 223–228 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pollick, F.E., Hill, H., Calder, A., Paterson, H.: Recognizing facial expression from spatially and temporally modified movements. Perception 32, 813–826 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Walk, R.D., Homan, C.P.: Emotion and dance in dynamic light displays. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22, 437–440 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Dittrich, W.H., Troscianko, T., Lea, S.E.G., Morgan, D.: Perception of emotion from dynamic point-light displays represented in dance. Perception 25, 727–738 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pollick, F.E., Paterson, H., Bruderlin, A., Sanford, A.J.: Perceiving affect from arm movement. Cognition 82, B51–B61 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Russell, J.A.: A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 1161–1178 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Amaya, K., Bruderlin, A., Calvert, T.: Emotion from motion. In: Davis, W.A., Bartels, R. (eds.) Graphics Interface, pp. 222–229 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pollick, F.E. (2004). The Features People Use to Recognize Human Movement Style. In: Camurri, A., Volpe, G. (eds) Gesture-Based Communication in Human-Computer Interaction. GW 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2915. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24598-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24598-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21072-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24598-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics