Skip to main content

A Quantum Perturbation Model (QPM) of Knowledge Fusion and Organizational Mergers

  • Conference paper
Agent-Mediated Knowledge Management (AMKM 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2926))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Future multiple agent system (MAS) missions are at risk whenever agent interactions occur faster than humans can intervene. Yet, no first principles exist that can be applied to improve mission success, solve ill-defined problems (idp‘s), or increase autonomy. To address this issue, agent mediated knowledge management (AMKM) must determine the fundamentals of information, I, and knowledge, K, generation plus their fundamental relations with agent organizations, decision-making, trust, cooperation, and competition. With the discovery of a group process rate equation, an ab initio approach to a new rational perspective of organization formation based on first principles was linked with K fusion and organizational mergers. Coupled Kolmogorov equations for I and K required distinguishing stable procedural-algorithmic K from unstable interaction-belief-expectations K (K χ ). Results suggest organizations use endogenous feedback from perturbations to control, ”tune”, or defend against competition; conversely, exogenous I modifies competitive attacks against an organization. The quicker to respond survives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allport, F.H.: A structuronomic conception of behav. J. Abn. Soc. Psych. 64, 3–30 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahoronov, Y., Bohm, D.: PR, vol. 122, pp. 1649–1658 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ambrose, S.H.: Paleolithic technology and human evolution. Science 291, 1748–1753 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Andrade, G., Stafford, E.: Investigating the economic role of mergers (Working Paper 00-006). Harvard, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Asch, S.: Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgement. In: Guetzkow, H. (ed.) Groups, leadership, and men, Pittsburgh, Carnegie (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Axtell, R.: Personal communication (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Axelrod, R.: The evolution of cooperation. Basic, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bailin, S.C., Truszkowski: Perspectives: An analysis of multiple viewpoints in agent based systems. In: AAAI-Spring Symposium, AMKM, Stanford, pp. 156–158

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bankes, S.C.: Perspective. Agent-based modeling. Proc. NAS 99(3), 7199 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Becker, J.: Hungry ghosts: Mao’s secret famine. Holt, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Benardete, S.: The argument of the action: Essays on Greek poetry and philosophy. Chicago U., Chicago (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Berken, C.: A brilliant solution: Inventing the American Constitution. Harcourt, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bohr, N. (ed.): Science and unity knowledge. Doubleday (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brehm, J.W.: A theory of psych. reactance. Academic Press, New York (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  15. CBO: Evaluating CBO’s record of economic forecasts (Supplement to: The Economic and Budget outlook: an Update, July 1, 1999) (1999), www.cbo.gov (Congressional Budget Office)

  16. Coase, R.: The nature of the firm. Economica 4, 386 (1937)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Conant, R.C.: Laws of information which govern systems. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 6, 240–255 (1976)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Crick, F., Koch, C.: Consciousness and neuroscience. Cerebral Cortex 8, 97–107 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Darpa (2002), http://www.darpa.mil/

  20. Dignum, V., Weigand, H.: Towards an Organization-Oriented Design Methodology for Agent Societie. In: Plekhanova, V. (ed.) Intelligent Agent Software Engineering, Idea Group Publishing, USA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. DH: Conversations involved with joint SAB-HAB meetings what alternated between consensus and majority rule (2001), also Lawless et al (2000a)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eagly, A.H., Chaiken, S.: The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eisert, J., Wilkens, M., Lewenstein, M.: Quantum games and quantum strategies. PRL 83(15), 3077–3080 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Engel, A., Fries, P., Konig, P., Brecht, M., Singer, W.: Temporal binding, binocular rivalry, and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 8(2), 128–151 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Farber, D.R.: Sloan rules: Alfred P. Sloan and the triumph of General Motors. University of Chicago, Chicago (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. French, A.P., Taylor, E.F.: An intro. quantum physics. Norton, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gmytrasiewicz, P.J.: On decision-theoretic approach to game theory, SS-02-02, pp. 1–8. AAAI, Menlo Park (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Grayson, J.M., Runger, G.C., Ibrahim, N.A.: Object-oriented organizations: Management insights from software principles. Quality Management Journal 3(4), 66–75 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hagan, S., Hameroff, S.R., Tuszynski, J.A.: Quantum computation in brain microtubles. Physical Review E 65, 61901–1, 11 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hannebauer, M.: Their problems are my problems. In: Tessier, C., Muller, H.J., Chaudron, L. (eds.) Conflicting agents: Conflict mgt in multi-agent systems, pp. 63–110. Kluwer, Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  31. House, J.S., Landis, K.R., Umberson, D.: Social relationships and healthq. Science 241, 540 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Janis, I.L.: Groupthink. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kelley, H.H.: Lewin, situations, and interdependence. Journal of Social Issues 47, 211–233 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kimura, M., Takahata, N. (eds.), Crow, J.F. (Designer): Population genetics, molecular evolution, and the neutral theory: Selected papers. U. Chicago Press, Chicago (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kirk, R.: More terrible than death. Massacres, drugs, and America’s war in Columbia. Public Affairs (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Latane, B.: The psychology of social impact. American Psych. 36, 343–356 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lawless, W.F.: The quantum of social action and the function of emotion. In: Proceedings of AAAI Fall Symposium, pp. 73–78 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lawless, W.F.: Information Density Functional Theory (IDFT): A quantum approach to knowledge fusion and organizational mergers. In: AAAI Spring Symposium, Stanford, pp. 71–73 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lawless, W.F., Castelao, T., Ballas, J.A.: Virtual knowl.: Bistable reality and solution ill-defined problems. IEEE Systems Man, & Cybern. 30(1), 119–126 (2000a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lawless, W.F., Castelao, Abubucker: Conflict. In: Tessier, et al. (eds.) Conflicting agents, pp. 279–302. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000b)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lawless, W.F., Castelao, T.: Univ Dec. Center. IEEE Techn. Soc. 20, 6–17 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lawless, W.F., Chandrasekara, R.: Information density functional theory: A quantum approach to intent. In: Draft Proceedings of AAAI Fall Symp. on Intent. Inferencing, Cape Cod, MA, pp. 26–31 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lawless, W.F., Schwartz, M.: The social quantum model of dissonance. Social Science Computer Review 20(4), 441–450 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Levine, J.M., Moreland, R.L.: Small groups. In: Gilbert, et al. (eds.) Hdbk Soc. Psych., pp. 415–469. McGraw, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lewin, K.: Field theory in social science. Harper, New York (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lloyd, S.: Ultimate physical limits to computation. Nature  406, 1047–1054 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Louçã, J.: Discussion Leader: Directions for Agent-Mediated Knowledge Management. In: AAAI Spring Symposium 2003, AMKM (2003), www.dfki.uni-kl.de/~elst/AMKM/papers_presentations.html , directions discussion.ppt

  48. Luce, R.D.: Decision and recognition, Hdbk Math. Psych. In: Luce, R.D., et al. (eds.) vol. I, pp. 103–189. Wiley, New York (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Luce, R.D.: Several unresolved conceptual problems of mathematical psychology. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 41, 79–87 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. Luce, R.D., Raiffa, H.: Games and decision. Wiley, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Malkiel, B.G.: A random walk down wall street, 7th edn. Norton, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  52. May, R.M.: Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton U. Press, Princeton (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: Agent ludens: Games for agent dialogues. In: Game Theoretic and Decision Theoretic Agents, AAAI Spring Symposium TR 22-01-03 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Milgram, S.: Obedience to authority. Harper and Row, New York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Nash Jr., J.F.: The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18, 155–162 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Nicolis, G., Progogine, I.: Exploring complexity. Freeman, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Petrie, C.: Adding AI to web services. In: Plenary, AMKM, AAAI-Spring 2003, March 24 (2003), http://snrc.stanford.edu/~petrie/fx-agents/xserv/AIfWS/index.html

  58. Pfister, H.L.: Cooperative control for wide area search with multiple autonomous vehicles using fuzzy logic. In: Annie 2002, St. Louis, MO, ASME (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Polanyi, M.: Personal knowledge. U. Chicago Press, chicago (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Pynadath, D., Scerri, P., Tambe, M.: MDPs for adjustable autonomy in real-world multi-agent environments. In: 2001 AAAI Spring Symposium, Technical Report SS-10-03, Stanford, CA, AAAI (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., Lyon, D.: Evidence for terror management theory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 57, 681–690 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sallach, D.: Modeling emotional dynamics: Currency versus fields. U. Chicago, Chicago (2002) (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Schlesinger, A.: The vital center, Cambridge, MA, Riverside (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Schumpeter, J.: A theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. Porcupine Press (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Shafir, E., Simonson, I., Tversky, A.: Cognition  49, 11–36 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Skinner, B.F.: Reflections on Behaviorism and society. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Slovic, P., Layman, M., Kraus, N., Flynn, J., Chalmers, J., Gesell, G.: Perceived risk, stigma, and potential economic impacts of a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada. In: Flynn, J., Slovic, P., Kunreuther, H. (eds.) Risk, Media and Stigma, Earthscan, London (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Tacla, C.A., Barthes, J.P.: A multi-agent architecture for knowledge acquisition. In: AAAI Spring 2003, AMKM, Stanford, pp. 156–158 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Tessier, C., Muller, H.-J., Fiorino, H., Chaudron, L.: Agents. conflicts: new issues. Conflicting agents. In: Tessier, C., Chaudron, L., Muller, H.J. (eds.) Kluwer, Boston (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  70. van Eeten, M.J.G.: Dialogues of the Deaf (Environ. Deadlocks). Eburon (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory games & economic beh. Princeton (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Von Neumann, J.: The mathematician. Collected works, Pergamon (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Wendt, A.: Social theory of international politics. Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  74. White Paper (WP), European governance (COM 2001, 428 final). Brussels (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Zajonc, R.B.: Emotion. In: Gilbert, D.T., Fiske, S.T., Lindzey, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology, McGraw-Hill, Boston (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Zeilinger, A.: Experiment and foundations of quantum physics. Reviews of Modern Physics 71, S288 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lawless, W.F., Grayson, J.M. (2004). A Quantum Perturbation Model (QPM) of Knowledge Fusion and Organizational Mergers. In: van Elst, L., Dignum, V., Abecker, A. (eds) Agent-Mediated Knowledge Management. AMKM 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2926. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24612-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24612-1_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20868-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24612-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics