Skip to main content

Modelling a European Decision Making Process with Heterogeneous Public Opinion and Lobbying: The Case of the Authorization Procedure for Placing Genetically Modified Organisms on the Market

  • Conference paper
Book cover Multi-Agent-Based Simulation III (MABS 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2927))

Abstract

The paper presents a multi-agent model simulating the European decision-making procedure for authorizing the placing on the market of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO). The model illustrates the political links between public opinions, lobbying groups and elected representatives at the national scale and at the European scale. It compares the procedure which was defined by the European 1990/220 Directive in 1990 with the new procedure which has replaced it in 2001 when the 2001/18 Directive was voted. The objective is to explore the impact of the innovations of the new Directive on the lobbying efficiency of NGOs and biotechnology firms and to assess if Multi-Agent simulation can help to improve our understanding of collective opinion and political markets dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antona, M., Farolfi, S.: Décision et négotiation des politiques environnementales: l’application de la fiscalité dans les pays du Nord et du Sud. Colloque Pirée. Les Instruments des Politiques Environnementales, Sophia Antipolis (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernauer, T., Meins, E.: Technological revolution meets policy and the market: explaining cross national differences in agricultural biotechnology regulation. Forthcoming in European Journal of Political research (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biliouri, D.: Environmental NGOs in Brussels: how powerful are their lobbying activities? Environmental Politics 8(2), 173–182 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bousquet, F.: Des milieux, des poissons, des hommes: étude par simulations multi-agents, Orstom editions (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, Z., McDermott, A.: International comparisons of biotechnology policies. Journal of consumer policy 21(4), 527–550 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Clerc, J.: Les stratégiés des ONG dans les négotiations liées à la biodiversité. Working Paper Lameta - 60 pages- forthcoming - INRA Montpellier France (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Echols, M.: Food safety regulation in the European Union and the United States: different cultures, diffrent laws. Columbia Journal of European Law 4 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. El Fallah Seghrouchni, A., Haddad, S., Nguilla, F.: A Consensus Protocol for Wide Area Networks. In: Proceedings of DAPSYS 1998 (Distributed and Parallel Systems 1998) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gilbert, N.: Emergence in Social Simulation. In: Conte, R., Gilbert, N. (eds.) Artificial Societies. The Computer Simulation of Social Life, pp. 144–156. UCL Press, London (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hosli, M.: Coalitions and Power: effects of qualified majority voting in the council of the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 34(2), 255–273 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalt, J., Zupan, M.: Capture and Ideology in the Economic Theory of Politics. American Economic Review 74, 279–300 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kirman, A., Widgren, M.: Voting in the European Union. Economic policy 21, 421–460 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Laruelle, A., Widgren, M.: is the alocation of oting power among EU states fair? Public Choice 94, 317–339 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lewidow: Regulating Bt Maize in the USA and Europe: a scientific-cultural comparison. Environment 41(10), 10–22 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morris, S.H.: European GMO regulation, a victim of biopolitics by S and C. Adlery. Information Systems for biotechnology (July 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Muller, H.J.: Negotiation principles. In: O’Hare, G.M.P., Jennings, N.R. (eds.) Foundations in Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pp. 211–229. Wiley interscience publication, Hoboken (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pollack, M.: Representing diffuse interests in EC policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy 4(4), 572–590 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Rouchier, J., Barreteau, O., Bousquet, F.: Evolution and Coevolution of Individuals and Groups. In: Demazeau, Y. (ed.) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 254–260. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rouchier: Apparition of reputation in an artificial society organised by a gift system. JASSS special issue (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rouchier, J.: Social intelligence for computers. Making artificial entities creative in their interactions. In: Dautenhahn, K., Bond, A., Cãnamero, L., Edmonds, B. (eds.) Socially Intelligent Agents: Creating relationships with computers and robots, ch. 10, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vogel, D.: The new politics of risk regulation in Europe. In: CARR discussion paper-Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation, London School of Economics (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rouchier, J., Thoyer, S. (2003). Modelling a European Decision Making Process with Heterogeneous Public Opinion and Lobbying: The Case of the Authorization Procedure for Placing Genetically Modified Organisms on the Market. In: Hales, D., Edmonds, B., Norling, E., Rouchier, J. (eds) Multi-Agent-Based Simulation III. MABS 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2927. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24613-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24613-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20736-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24613-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics