Abstract
Software Product-Line Engineering has emerged in recent years, as an important strategy for maximising reuse within the context of a family of related products. In current approaches to software product-lines, there is general agreement that the definition of a reference-architecture for the product-line is an important step in the software engineering process. In this paper we introduce ADLARS, a new form of architecture Description language that places emphasis on the capture of architectural relationships. ADLARS is designed for use within a product-line engineering process. The language supports both the definition of architectural structure, and of important architectural relationships. In particular it supports capture of the relationships between product features, component and task architectures, interfaces and parameter requirements.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Kang, K.C., Cohen, S.G., Hess, J.A., Novak, W.E., Patterson, A.S.: Feature Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) feasibility study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, available from the Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University (1990)
Clements, P., Northrop, L.M.: A Framework for Software Product Line Practice – version 2. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University (1999)
Lee, K., Kang, K.C., Chae, W., Choi, B.B.: Feature-based approach to object-oriented engineering of applications for reuse. Software Practice and Experience 30, 1025–1046 (2000)
Kang, K.C., Kim, S., Lee, J., Lee, K.: Feature-Oriented Engineering of PBX Software for Adaptability and Reusability. Software Practice and Experience 29(10), 875–896 (1999)
Fey, D., Fajta, R., Boros, A.: Feature Modeling: A Meta-model to Enhance Usability and Usefulness. In: Chastek, G.J. (ed.) SPLC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2379, pp. 198–216. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Brown, T.J., Spence, I., Kilpatrick, P.: Adaptable Components for Software Product-line Engineering. In: Chastek, G.J. (ed.) SPLC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2379, pp. 154–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
van Ommering, R., van der Linden, F., Kramer, J., Magee, J.: The Koala Component Model for Consumer Electronics Software. IEEE Computer, 78–85 (March 2000)
McRitchie, I., Brown, T.J., Spence, I.: Managing Component. Variability within Embedded Software Product Lines via Transformational Code Generation. In: van der Linden, F.J. (ed.) PFE 2003. LNCS, vol. 3014, pp. 98–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Medvidovic, N.: A classification and Comparison Framework for Software Architecture Description Languages., Technical Report UCI-ICS-97-02, University of California, Irvine CA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Brown, T.J., Spence, I.T.A., Kilpatrick, P. (2004). A Relational Architecture Description Language for Software Families. In: van der Linden, F.J. (eds) Software Product-Family Engineering. PFE 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3014. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24667-1_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24667-1_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21941-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24667-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive