Skip to main content

Testing the Scalability of Overlay Routing Infrastructures

  • Conference paper
Passive and Active Network Measurement (PAM 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3015))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated the utility of alternate paths in improving connectivity of two end hosts. However studies that comprehensively evaluate the tradeoff between its effectiveness and overhead are lacking. In this paper we carefully characterize and evaluate the trade-off between (1) the efficacies of alternate path routing in improving end-to-end delay and loss, and (2) the overheads introduced by alternate routing methodology. This would help us to test the scalability of an overlay network.

We collected ping data on PlanetLab and studied the above trade-off under different parameter settings such as path sampling frequency, overlay-connectivity, number of overlay hops etc. Results from ten sets of measurements using 35 to 36 of the PlanetLab nodes are used to test the effect of the various parameters. We find that changing epoch duration and connectivity helps reduce the overheads by a factor of 4 and 2 respectively at the cost of some lost performance gain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen, D., Snoeren, A., Balakrishna, H.: Best-Path vs. Multi-Path Overlay Routing. In: Proc. of the ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Conference, Miami, FL (October 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen, D., Balakrishna, H., Kaashoek, F., Morris, R.: Resilient Overlay Networks. In: Proc. of the 18th ACM Symposium on Operating System Principles (October 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Savage, S., Collins, A., Hoffman, E., Snell, J., Anderson, T.: The End-to-end Effects of Internet Path Selection. In: Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM (September 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Peterson, L., Anderson, T., Culler, D., Roscoe, T.: A Blueprint for Introducing Disruptive Technology into the Internet. In: Proc. of ACM HOTNET (October 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Savage, S., Anderson, T., et al.: Detour:A Case for Informed Internet Routing and Transport. IEEE Micro 19(1), 50–59 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rewaskar, S., Kaur, J. (2004). Testing the Scalability of Overlay Routing Infrastructures. In: Barakat, C., Pratt, I. (eds) Passive and Active Network Measurement. PAM 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3015. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24668-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24668-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21492-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-24668-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics